Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure

Counselor Education and Supervision

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 263-275

  Ladany, Nicholas ^a   Walker, Jessica A ^a   Melincoff, Deborah S ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959840856     PISSN: 00110035     EISSN: 15566978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2001.tb01259.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baker, D. E., (1991). The relationship of the supervisory working alliance to supervisor and supervisee narcissism, gender, and theoretical orientation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(7-B), 1484B. (University Microfilms No. 90-14, 392).
2. Bernard, J. M., (1979). Supervision training: A discrimination model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 19, 60-68.
3. Bernard, J. M., (1997). The discrimination model. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 310-327). New York: Wiley.
4. Bernard, J. M., and Goodyear, R. K., (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Bordin, E. S., (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35-41.
6. Carroll, M., (1996). Counseling supervision: Theory, skills, and practice. London: Cassell.
7. Cohen, J., (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Efstation, J. J., Patton, M. J., and Kardash, C. M., (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329.
9. Ekstein, R., (1964). Supervision of psychotherapy: Is it teaching? Is it administration? Or is it therapy? Psychotherapy, Research, and Practice, 1, 137-138.
10. Ellis, M. V., and Ladany, N., (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E.Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447-507). New York: Wiley.
11. Friedlander, M.L., and Ward, L. G., (1984). Development and validation of the Supervisory Styles Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 541-557.
12. Haase, R. F., and Ellis, M. V., (1987). Multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 404-413.
13. Haase, R. F., Ellis, M. V., Ladany, N., (1989). Evaluating the magnitude of experimental effects: Clarifying some issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 511-516.
14. Hendrick, S. S., (1987). Counseling and self-disclosure. In V. J.Derlega & J. H.Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 303-327). New York: Plenum.
15. Hess, A. K. (Ed.). (1980). Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.
16. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Cogar, M. C., and Denman, D. W., (1993). Beneath the surface of long-term therapy: Therapist and client report of their own and each other’s covert processes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 278-287.
17. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., and Corbett, M. M., (1992). The impact of therapist ability to perceive displayed and hidden client reactions on immediate outcome in first sessions of brief therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 143-155.
18. Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Ladany, N., Brittan-Powell, C. S., and Pannu, R. K., (1997). The influence of supervisory racial identity interaction and racial matching on the supervisory working alliance and supervisee multicultural competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 284-304.
20. Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., and Friedlander, M. L., (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77, 447-455.
21. Ladany, N., and Friedlander, M. L., (1995). The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and supervisee role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 220-231.
22. Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., and Nutt, E. A., (1996). The nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 10-24.
23. Ladany, N., and Lehrman-Waterman, D. E., (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisor working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 143-160.
24. Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D. E., Molinaro, M., and Wolgast, B., (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443-475.
25. Muse-Burke, J. L., Ladany, N., and Deck, M., (2001). The Supervisory relationsip. In L. J.Bradley & N.Ladany (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, & practice (3rd ed., pp. 28-62). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
26. Stoltenberg, C. D., and McNeill, B. W., (1997). Clinical supervision from a developmental perspective: Research and practice. In C. E.Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 184-202) New York: Wiley.
27. Usher, C. H., and Borders, L. D., (1993). Practicing counselors’ preferences for supervisory style and supervisory emphasis. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33, 66-79.
28. Williams, L., (1994). A tool for training supervisors: Using the Supervision Feedback Form (SFF). Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 20, 311-315.
29. Yourman, D. B., and Farber, B. A., (1996). Nondisclosure and distortion in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 33, 567-575.