Simulation of the impacts of land-use change on surface runoff of Lai Nullah Basin in Islamabad, Pakistan

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 271-279

  Ali, Muhammad ^a   Khan, Sher Jamal ^a   Aslam, Irfan ^a   Khan, Zahiruddin ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY NUST   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Calibration; GIS; Hydrological modeling; Surface runoff; Validation; Watershed land use

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; RAIN; RUNOFF; STORMS; WATERSHEDS;

ECOLOGICAL PROCESS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; ISLAMABAD , PAKISTAN; LAND USE CHANGE MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SURFACE RUNOFFS; VALIDATION; WATERSHED LANDS;

LAND USE;

CALIBRATION; DISCHARGE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GIS; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MODEL VALIDATION; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PEAK DISCHARGE; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RUNOFF; STORMWATER; WATERSHED;

ISLAMABAD [PAKISTAN]; LAI NULLAH BASIN; PAKISTAN;

EID: 80052149430     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson M.L., Chen Z.-Q., Kavvas M.L., Feldman A. Coupling HEC-HMS with atmospheric models for prediction of watershed runoff. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2002, 7:312-318.
2. Becker A., Grunewald U. Flood risk in central Europe. Science 2003, 300:1099.
3. Beighley R.E., Melack M., Dunne T. Impacts of California's climatic regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2003, 39:1419-1433.
4. Beighley R.E., Moglen G.E. Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanized watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal. Water Resources Research 2003, 39:1093-1104.
5. Bryant R.G., Rainey M.P. Investigation of flood inundation on playas within the Zone of Chotts, using a time-series of AVHRR. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 82:360-375.
6. Camorani G., Castellarin A., Brath A. Effects of land use changes on the hydrologic response of reclamation system. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 2005, 30:561-574.
7. CGSIAR - Consortium of Spatial Information (CGIAR-CSI) SRTM 90m Digital Elevation Data Version 4 2008, Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research, (last update: August 19, 2008; accessed on July 25, 2009). http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/.
8. Chen Y., Xu Y., Yin Y. Impact of land use change scenarios on storm-runoff generation in Xitiaoxi basin, China. Quaternary International 2009, 1:1-8.
9. Chow V.T., Maidment D.R., Mays L.W. Applied hydrology 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Debo T.N., Reese A.J. Municipal stormwater management 2003, Lewis Publishers, New York.
11. Defries R., Eshleman K.N. Impact of California's climatic regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2004, 39:1419-1433.
12. Dolcine L., Andrieu H., Sempre-Torres D., Creutin D. Flash flood forecasting with coupled precipitation model in mountainous Mediterranean basin. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2001, 6:1-10.
13. Dutta D., Herath S., Musiake K. Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically based distributed hydrologic model. Hydrological Processes 2000, 14:497-519.
14. Giertz S., Diekkruger B., Jaeger A., Schopp M. An interdisciplinary scenario analysis to assess the water availability and water consumption in the Upper Oueme catchment in Benin. Advances in Geosciences 2006, 9:3-13.
15. Hernandez M., Miller S.N., Goodrich D.C., Goff B.F., Kepner W.G., Edmonds C.M., et al. Modeling runoff response to land cover and rainfall spatial variability in semi-arid watersheds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2000, 64:285-298.
16. Horritt M.S., Bates P.D. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 268:87-99.
17. Hudson P.F., Colditz R.R. Flood delineation in a large and complex alluvial valley, lower Panuco basin, Mexico. Journal of Hydrology 2003, 280:229-245.
18. Knebl M.R., Yang Z.L., Hutchison K., Maidment D.R. Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: A case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. Journal of Environmental Management 2004, 75:325-336.
19. Lee K.S., Lee S.I. Assessment of post-flooding conditions of rice fields with multi-temporal satellite SAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 24:3457-3465.
20. McColl C., Agget G. Land use forecasting and hydrologic model integration for improved land use decision support. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 84:494-512.
21. Niehoff D., Fritsch U., Bronstert A. Land-use impacts on stormrunoff generation: Scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 267:80-93.
22. PMD, Pakistan Meteorological Department The project for the improvement of the flood forecasting and warning system for Lai Nullah Basin 2008, JICA, Islamabad.
23. Potter K.W. Hydrological impact of changing land management practices in a moderate-sized agricultural catchment. Water Resources Research 1991, 27:845-855.
24. Riebsame W.E., Meyer W.E., Turner B.L. Modeling land use and cover as part of global environmental change. Climatic Change 1994, 28:45-64.
25. Roo A.D., Schmuck G., Perdigao V., Thielen J. The influence of historic land use changes and future planned land use scenarios on floods in the Oder catchment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 2003, 28:1291-1300.
26. Serrano S.E. Hydrology for engineers, geologist and environmental professional 1997, HydroScience, Kentucky.
27. Sheng Y., Gong P., Xiao Q. Quantitative dynamic flood monitoring with NOAA AVHRR. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:1709-1724.
28. Townsend P.A., Walsh S.J. Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 1998, 21:295-312.
29. USACE, United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2000). Hydrological modeling system HEC-HMS. Washington, DC, USA.
30. USACE, United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2003). Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension, HEC-GeoHMS, user's manual version 1.1. Davis, CA, USA.
31. USACE, United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2008). Hydrological modeling system, HEC-HMS, user's manual, version 3.3. Davis, CA, USA.
32. USDA, United States Department of Agriculture Urban hydrology for small watersheds 1986, National Resource Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA.
33. Voinov A., Costanza R., Wainger L., Boumans R., Villa F., Maxwell T., et al. Patuxent landscape model: Integrated ecological economic modelling of a watershed. Environmental Modelling & Software 1999, 14:474-491.
34. Voinov A., Voinov H., Costanza R. Surface water flow in landscape models: Patuxent watershed case study. Ecological Modelling 1999, 119:211-230.
35. Vorosmarty C.J, Green P., Salisbury J., Lammers R. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 2000, 289:284-288.
36. Wang G.X., Liu J.Q., Kubota J.P., Chen L. Effects of land use changes on hydrological processes in the middle basin of the Heihe River, northeast China. Hydrological Processes 2007, 21:1370-1382.
37. WMO, World Meteorological Organization Our future climate (publication WO-952) 2003.
38. WMO, World Meteorological Organization Integrated Flood Management, Pakistan: Lai Nullah Basin Flood Problem Islamabad - Rawalpindi Cities. The Associated Programme on Flood Management, Global Water Partnership 2004.