Surface water flow in landscape models: 2. Patuxent watershed case study

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 119, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 211-230

  Voinov, Alexey A ^a   Voinov, Helena ^a   Costanza, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

DEM; Hydrology; Landscape spatial modeling; Overland flow; Temporal and spatial resolution

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; SURFACE WATER; WATER FLOW; WATERSHED;

EID: 0033565885     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00056-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbott, M.B., J.C. Bathurst, J.A. Cunge, P.E. O'Connell, J. Rasmussen, 1986. An introduction to the European hydrological system - systeme hydrologique Europeen, 'SHE' 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol. 87: 61-77.
2. AQUA TERRA, M., USGS, 1994. Patuxent River Basin Watershed Model, 94.
3. Beasley, D.B., Huggins L.F., 1980. ANSWERS (Areal Nonpoint Source Watershed Environment Response Slmulation), User's Manual. West Lafayette, Purdue University.
4. Beven K.J., Kirkby M.J. A physically-based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24(1):1979;43-69.
5. Bockstael, N., Costanza R., Strand I., Boynton W., Bell K., Wainger L., 1995. Ecological economic modeling and valuation of ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 14, 143-159.
6. Boyer M.C. Streamflow measurements. Chow V.T. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. 1964;15.1-15.42 McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. CBP, 1998. The Chesapeake Bay Program, http://www.chesapeakebay.neVbayprogram/.
8. Donigian, A.S., Imhoff J.C., Bicknell B.R., Kittle J.L., 1984. Application Guide for Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF). Athens, GA, US EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory.
9. EARTHINFO, I., 1993. SD on CD. NCDC Summary of the Day. East. Boulder, CO, EARTHINFO, Inc.
10. ESRI, 1992. Cell-based Modeling with GRID 6.1. Supplement-Hydrologic and distance modeling tools. Redlands, CA, ESRI.
11. ESRI, 1994. ARC/INFO. GRID-CELL Modeling. Redlands, CA, Environmental Systems Research Institutes, Inc.
12. Fitz, H.C., Costanza R., Voinov A., 1999. A dynamic spatial model as a tool for integrated assessment of the Everglades, USA. In: R. Costanza. (Ed.), Ecological Economics for Integrated Modeling and Assessment (in press).
13. Fitz, H.C., DeBellevue E., Costanza R., Boumans R., Maxwell T., Wainger L., Sklar F., 1996. Development of a general ecosystem model for a range of scales and ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 88; (113): 263-295.
14. Grayson R.B., Moore I.D., McMahon T.A. Physically based hydrologic modeling: 1. A Terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Res. Res. 28(10):1992;2639-2658.
15. Haith, D.A., Tubbs L.J., Pickering N.B., 1984. Simulation of pollution by soil erosion and soil nutrient loss. Wageningen, Pudoc.
16. Jakeman A.J., Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resources Res. 29(8):1993;2637-2649.
17. James, R.W.J., Hornlein J.F., Strain B.F., Smigaj M.J., 1990. Water Resource Data. Maryland and Delaware. Water Year 1990. Vol. 1. Atlantic Slope Basins, Delaware River through Patuxent River., US Geological Survey Water Data Report.
18. Maryland Department of State Planning, 1973. Natural Soil Groups of Maryland. Technical Report, MD Dept. of State Planning.
19. Maxwell, T., 1995. Distributed Modular Spatio-Temporai Simulation. http://kabir.cbl.cees.edu /SME3.
20. NOAA/National Ocean Service, 1997. MapFinder Home Page., http://mapindex.nos.noaa.gov/.
21. Novotny V., Olem H. Water Quality. Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution. 1994;Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
22. NRCS USDA (1997). State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base, http://www. neg. n rcs. usda.gov/statsgo. html.
23. Park R.A., Groden T.W., Desormeau C.J. Modifications to the model CLEANER requiring further research. Scavia A.R.D. Perspectives on Aquatic Ecosystem Modeling. 1979;87-108 Ann Arbor, MI.
24. Parton, W.J., Stewart J.W.B., Cole C.V., 1988. Dynamics of C, N, P, and S in grassland soils: A model. Biogeochemistry 5: 109-131.
25. Post D.A., Jakeman A.J. Relationship between catchment attributes and hydrolocal response characteristics in small Australian Mountain Ash catchments. Hydrol. Process. 10:1996;877-892.
26. Rawls W.J.L.R, Ahuja D.L., Brakensiek S.A Infiltration and soil water movement. Maidment D.R. Handbook of Hydrology. 1992;5.1-5.51 McGraw-Hill, New York.
27. Skaggs R.W., Khaleel R. Infiltration. In: C.T. Haan. (Ed.), Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds. St. Joseph, Mich. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 5:1982;4-166.
28. Sklar, F.H., Costanza R., Day J.W., Jr., 1985. Dynamic spatial simulation modeling od coastal wetland habitat succession. Ecol. Model. 29: 261-281.
29. USACERL, 1993. GRASS Version 4.1. User's reference manual., Open GRASS Foundation Center for Remote Sensing, Boston University.
30. USCB, 1996. TIGER: The Coast to Coast Digital Maps Database, US Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/.
31. USGS, 1995. 1-Degree USGS Digital Elevation Model, US Geological Survey, http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/glis/hyper/guide/1_dgr_dem.
32. USGS, 1995a. Maryland NWIS-W Data Retrieval, http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis-w/MD/.
33. Voinov A., Fitz C., Costanza R. Surface water flow in landscape models: 1. Everglades case study. Ecol. Model. 108(1-3):1998;131-144.
34. Watkins, D.W., Jr., McKinney D.C., Maidment D.R., Lin M.D., 1996. GIS and Groundwater Modeling. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., ASCE 122 (2), 88-96.
35. Ye, Z., Maidment D.R., McKinney D.C., 1996. Map-based surface and subsurface flow simulation models: An object-oriented and GIS approach, http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/gishyd97/library/ye/rep96_5.htm.