Enhancing multi-label music genre classification through ensemble techniques

SIGIR'11 - Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 705-714

  Sanden, Chris ^a   Zhang, John Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ensemble techniques; Genre classification; Multilabel classification; Music Information Retrieval (MIR)

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL EXPERIMENTS; ENSEMBLE TECHNIQUES; GENRE CLASSIFICATION; MULTI-LABEL CLASSIFICATIONS; MULTIPLE CLASSIFIERS; MUSIC GENRE CLASSIFICATION; MUSIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 80052120713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2010011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. J. J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Representing musical genre: A state of the art. J. New Music Research, 32(1):83-93, 2003.
2. J. J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Improving timbre similarity: How high is the sky? J, of Negative Results in Speech and Audio Sciences, 1(1), 2004.
3. J. Bergstra, N. Casagrande, D. Erhan, D. Eck, and B. Kgl. Aggregate features and AdaBoost for music classification. Machine Learning: Special Issue on Machine Learning in Music, 65(2-3):2-3, 2006.
4. N. V. Chawla and J. Sylvester. Exploiting diversity in ensembles: improving the performance on unbalanced datasets. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Multiple Classifier Systems, pages 397-406, 2007. (Pubitemid 350284265)
5. W. Cheng and E. Hullermeier. Combining instance-based learning and logistic regression for multilabel classification. Machine Learning, 76(2-3):211-225, 2009.
6. J. Futrelle and J. S. Downie. Interdisciplinary communities and research issues in music information retrieval. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 121-131, 2002.
7. M. Ioannou, G. Sakkas, G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. Obtaining bipartitions from score vectors for Multi-Label classification. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 409-416, 2010.
8. L. Kuncheva. Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
9. E. Law and L. von Ahn. Input-agreement: a new mechanism for collecting data using human computation games. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1197-1206, 2009.
10. H. Lukashevich, J. Abeßer, C. Dittmar, and H. Grossmann. From multi-labeling to multi-domain-labeling: A novel two-dimensional approach to music genre classification. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 459-464, 2009.
11. C. McKay and I. Fujinaga. Musical genre classification: Is it worth pursuing and how can it be improved? In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 101-106, 2006.
12. S. R. Ness, A. Theocharis, G. Tzanetakis, and L. G. Martins. Improving automatic music tag annotation using stacked generalization of probabilistic svm outputs. In Proc. ACM Int'l Conf. Multimedia, pages 705-708, 2009.
13. F. Pachet. Content management for electronic music distribution: The real issues. Comm. of the ACM, 46(4):71-75, 2003.
14. F. Pachet and D. Cazaly. A taxonomy of musical genres. In Proc. Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, 2000.
15. F. Pachet and P. Roy. Improving multi-label analysis of music titles: A large-scale validation of the correction hypothesis. IEEE Trans. on Audio, Speech & Language Processing, 17(2):335-343, 2009.
16. E. Pampalk, A. Flexer, and G. Widmer. Improvements of audio-based music similarity and genre classification. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 628-633, 2005.
17. C. Sanden, C. R. Befus, and J. Z. Zhang. Perception based multi-label genre classification on music data. In Proc. Int'l Computer Music Conf., pages 9-15, 2010.
18. M. Tahir, J. Kittler, K. Mikolajczyk, and F. Yan. Improving multilabel classification performance by using ensemble of multi-label classifiers. In Multiple Classifier Systems, volume 5997, chapter 2, pages 11-21. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
19. K. Trohidis, G. Tsoumakas, G. Kalliris, and I. Vlahavas. Multilabel classification of music into emotions. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 325-330, 2008.
20. G. Tsoumakas and I. Katakis. Multi-label classification: An overview. Int'l J. Data Warehousing and Mining, 3(3):1-13, 2007.
21. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, and I. Vlahavas. Mining multi-label data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, 2010.
22. G. Tsoumakas, J. Vilcek, E. Spyromitros, and I. Vlahavas. Mulan: A Java library for multi-label learning. J. Machine Learning Research, Accepted, 2010.
23. G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Musical genre classification of audio signals. In IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, pages 293-302, 2002. (Pubitemid 34950067)
24. D. Wang, T. Li, and M. Ogihara. Are tags better than audio? The effect of joint use of tags and audio content features for artistic style clustering. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pages 57-62, 2010.
25. A. Wieczorkowska, P. Synak, and R. Zbigniew. Multi-label classification of emotions in music. In Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, Advances in Soft Computing, pages 307-315. 2006.
26. M. L. Zhang and Z. H. Zhou. ML-kNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern Recognition, 40(7):2038-2048, 2007.