Use of the functional independence measure for outcomes measurement in acute inpatient rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Nursing

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 111-117

  Cournan, Michele ^a  

^a Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052104033     PISSN: 02784807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2011.tb00075.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Berg, K., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Williams, J. I., & Gayton, D. (1989). Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41, 304-311. (Pubitemid 20026286)
2. Black, T. (1999). Outcomes: What's all the fuss about? Rehabilitation Nursing, 24(5), 188-189, 191.
3. Black, T. (2007). Chapter 19: Outcome measurement and performance improvement. In K. Mauk, (Ed). The specialty practice of rehabilitation nursing: A core curriculum (4th ed.). Glenview, IL: Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.
4. Black, T. M., Soltis, T., & Bartlett, C. (1999) Using the Functional Independence Measure instrument to predict stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Nursing, 24(3), 109-114, 121.
5. Brass, T. J., Loushin, M. K., Day, J. W., & Iaizzo, P. A. (1996) An improved method for muscle force assessment in neuromuscular disease. Journal of Medical Engineering Technology, 20, 67-74. (Pubitemid 26248232)
6. Cavanagh, S. J., Hogan, K., Gordon, V., & Fairfax, J. (2000) Stroke specific FIM models in an urban population, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 32(1), 17-21.
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2002). IRF Patient Assessment Instrument. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from www.cms.hhs.gov/ InpatientRehabFacPPS/04-IRFPAI.asp.
8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2006). Deficit reduction act. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from www.cms.hhs.gov/demoprojectsevalrpts/.
9. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2009). Medicare Program; Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Federal Fiscal Year 2010. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from http://69.175.53.6/register/2009/ may/06/E9-10078.pdf.
10. Chau, N., Daler, S., Andre, J. M., & Patris, A. (1994). Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disability Rehabilitation, 16(2), 63-71. (Pubitemid 24156046)
11. Cohen, M. E., & Marino, R. J. (2000). The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(2), S21-S29.
12. Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. (2009). Medical rehabilitation standards manual. Tuscon, AZ: CARF International.
13. Deutsch, A., Braun, S., & Granger, C. (1996). The functional independence measure (FIMSM Instrument) and the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM® Instrument): Ten years of development. Critical Reviews in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(4), 267-281.
14. Disler, P. B., Roy, C. W., & Smith, B. P. (1993). Predicting hours of care needed. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(2), 139-143. (Pubitemid 23059297)
15. Dittmar, S., & Gresham, G. (1997). Appendix A: Description and display of selected functional assessment and outcome measures in physical rehabilitation. In Functional assessment and outcome measurement for the rehabilitation healthcare professional (pp. 90-138).
16. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen. Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C., & Deyo, R. A. (1993). A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(5), 531-536. (Pubitemid 23141404)
17. Dromerick, A., Edwards, D., & Diringer, M. (2003). Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: A comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 40(1), 1.
18. Granger, C. V., Cotter, A. S., Hamilton, B. B., Fiedler, R. C., & Hens, M. M. (1990). Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 870-875. (Pubitemid 20352470)
19. Granger, C. V., Deutsch, A., Russell, C., Black, T., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2007). Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(11), 883-892. (Pubitemid 351339385)
20. Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Fiedler, R. C. (1992). Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 23(7), 978-982.
21. Grey, N., & Kennedy, P. (1993). The Functional Independence Measure: A comprehensive study of clinician and self-ratings. Paraplegia, 31(7), 457-461. (Pubitemid 23262642)
22. Guyatt, G. H., Sullivan, M. J., Thompson, P. J., Fallen, E. L., Pugsley, S. O., Taylor, D. W., et al. (1985). The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 132, 919-923.
23. Hamilton, B. B., Laughlin, J. A., Fiedler, R. C., & Granger, C. V. (1994). Interrater reliability of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26(3), 115-119. (Pubitemid 24257400)
24. Heinemann, A. W., Linacre, J. M., Wright, B. D., Hamilton, B. B., & Granger, C. V. (1994). Measurement characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 1(3), 1-15.
25. Kwon, S., Hartzema, A. G., Duncan, P. W., & Min-Lai, S. (2004). Disability measures in stroke: Relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke, 35(4), 918-923. (Pubitemid 38419803)
26. Lawton, M. P. (1971). The functional assessment of elderly people. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 19(6), 465-481.
27. Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1994). The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 127-132. (Pubitemid 24061483)
28. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
29. Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(12), 1226-1232. (Pubitemid 26424833)
30. Ottenbacher, K. J., Mann, W. C., Granger, C. V., Tomita, M., Hurren, D., & Charvat, B. (1994). Interrater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(12), 1297-1301.
31. Oczkowski, W. J., & Barreca, S. (1993). The Functional Independence Measure: Its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(12), 1291-1294. (Pubitemid 24008147)
32. Pollak, N., Rheault, W., & Stoecker, J. L. (1996). Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(10), 1056-1061. (Pubitemid 26339631)
33. Segal, M. E., Gillard, M., & Schall, R. R. (1996). Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the Functional Independence Measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(3), 208-212. (Pubitemid 26195640)
34. Stineman, M. G., Shea, J. A., Jette, A., Tassoni, C. J., Ottenbacher, K. J., Fiedler, R., et al. (1996). The Functional Independence Measure: Tests of scaling, assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(11), 1101-1108. (Pubitemid 26378626)
35. Stineman, M. G., Jette, A., Fiedler, R., & Granger, C. V. (1997). Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 636-643. (Pubitemid 27259889)
36. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 13(2), 81-84.
37. Wallace, D., Duncan, P. W., & Lai, S. (2002). Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke. The impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(9), 922-928. (Pubitemid 35246564)
38. Wilson, D. B., Houle, D. M., & Keith, R. (1991). Stroke rehabilitation: A model predicting return home. Western Journal of Medicine, 154(5), 587-590.
39. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. (1996). Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York.
40. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. (1999). The FIMware® user guide and self-guided training manual, Version 5.20. Buffalo, NY: UDSMR.
41. van der Putten, J. J., Hobart, J. C., Freeman, J. A., & Thompson, A. J. 1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 66(4), 480-484. (Pubitemid 29145683)