The role of strategic enterprise risk management and organizational flexibility in easing new regulatory compliance

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 171-188

  Arnold, Vicky ^a   Benford, Tanya ^b   Canada, Joseph ^a   Sutton, Steve G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Control environment; Enterprise risk management; Internal control; IT compatibility; Management control systems; Organizational flexibility; Sarbanes Oxley Act

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052095110     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abernethy M.A., Brownell P. The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Acc Organ Soc 1999, 24:189-204.
2. Abernethy M.A., Lillis A.M. The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control systems design. Acc Organ Soc 1995, 20(4):241-258.
3. Ahrens T., Chapman C.S. Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: a field study in management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemp Acc Res 2004, 21(2):271-301.
4. Amburgey T.L., Miner A.S. Strategic momentum: the effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strateg Manage J 1992, 13:335-348.
5. Amburgey T.L., Kelly D., Barnett W.P. Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational change and failure. Adm Sci Q 1993, 38:51-73.
6. Arnold V., Benford T.S., Canada J., Kuhn J.R., Sutton S.G. The unintended consequences of Sarbanes-Oxley on technology innovation and supply chain integration. J Emerg Technol Acc 2007, 4(1):103-121.
7. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: the case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. J Appl Psychol 1990, 75:547-560.
8. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.
9. Beasley M.S., Clune R., Hermanson D.R. Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. J Acc Public Policy 2005, 24:521-531.
10. Bloomberg M.R., Schumer C.E., McKinsey and Company Sustaining New York's and the US' Global Financial Services Leadership 2007, McKinsey and Company, New York.
11. Bollen K., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull 1991, 110(2):305-314.
12. Bouwens J., Abernethy M.A. The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Acc Organ Soc 2000, 25:221-241.
13. Byrd T.A., Turner D.E. Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. J Manage Inf Syst 2000, 17(1):167-208.
14. Cannon A.R., St. John C.H. Competitive strategy and plant level flexibility. Int J Prod Res 2004, 42(10):1987-2007.
15. Chapman C.S., Kihn L.-A. Information system integration, enabling control and performance. Acc Organ Soc 2009, 34(2):151-169.
16. Chenhall R.H. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Acc Organ Soc 2003, 28:127-168.
17. Chenhall R.H., Euske K.J. The role of management control systems in planned organizational change: an analysis of two organizations. Acc Organ Soc 2007, 32:601-637.
18. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research 1998, 295-336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey. G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.).
19. Clark C.J., Varma S. Strategic risk management: the new competitive edge. Long Range Plann 1999, 32(4):414-424.
20. Collier P.M. Fundamentals of risk management for accountants and managers 2009, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Internal control-integrated framework 1992, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
22. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Enterprise risk management-integrated framework 2004, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
23. Davila T. An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development. Acc Organ Soc 2000, 25:383-409.
24. DeFond M.L., Francis J.R. Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. AUDITING. J Pract Theory 2005, 24:5-30. (supplement).
25. Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manage 2006, 17:263-282.
26. Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H.M. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res 2001, 38(2):269-277.
27. Diamantopoulos A., Riefler P., Roth K.P. Advancing formative measurement models. J Bus Res 2008, 61(12):1203-1218.
28. Ditillo A. Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: the role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Acc Organ Soc 2004, 29:401-421.
29. EACLN, NAACLN Enterprise risk: recurring challenges and new considerations for the audit committee. ViewPoints for the Audit Committee Leadership Summit 8 (31 October 2008) 2008.
30. Ernst and Young Internal controls: from compliance to competitive edge 2008, EYGM Limited, New York.
31. Ernst and Young The future of risk management and internal control 2008, EYGM Limited, New York.
32. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981, 18(1):39-50.
33. Grewal R., Tansuhaj P. Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. J Mark 2001, 65:67-80. (April).
34. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tathan R.L. Multivariate data analysis 2006, Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
35. Institute of Internal Auditors The role of internal audit in enterprise-wide risk management 2004, The Institute of Internal Auditors UK and Ireland, London.
36. Katz D.M. Panels on 404 skirt small-company woes May 02. http://CFO.com.
37. Kettinger W.K., Grover V. Toward a theory of business change management. J Manage Inf Syst 1995, 12(1):9-30.
38. Kleffner A., Lee R., McGannon B. The effect of corporate governance on the use of enterprise risk management: evidence from Canada. Risk Manage Insur Rev 2003, 6(1):53-73.
39. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2005, The Guilford Press, New York. Second Edition.
40. KPMG International survey of audit committee members 2008, Audit Committee Institute, London.
41. Lam J. Enterprise risk management 2003, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
42. Langfield-Smith K. Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Acc Organ Soc 1997, 22(2):207-232.
43. Levine R. Risk management systems: understanding the need. EDPACS 2004, 32(2):1-13.
44. Liang H., Saraf N., Hu Q., Xue Y. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q 2007, 31(4):59-88.
45. Liebenberg A., Hoyt R. The determinants of enterprise risk management: evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers. Risk Manage Insur Rev 2003, 6(1):37-52.
46. Naranjo-Gil D., Hartmann F. How top management teams use management accounting systems to implement strategy. J Manage Acc Res 2006, 18:21-53.
47. Naranjo-Gil D., Hartmann F. Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Acc Organ Soc 2007, 32:735-756.
48. Olsson R. In search of opportunity management: is the risk management process enough?. Int J Project Manage 2007, 25:745-752.
49. Palanisamy R. Strategic information systems planning model for building flexibility and success. Ind Manage Data Syst 2005, 105(1):63-81.
50. Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q 2007, 31(4):623-656.
51. Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003, 88(5):879-903.
52. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will A. SmartPLS 2.0 (beta) http://www.smartpls.de.
53. Romano R. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance. Yale Law Rev 2005, 114:1521-1611.
54. Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Q 2003, 27(2):237-263.
55. Sanchez R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manage J 1995, 16:135-159.
56. Simons R. The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: a new perspective. Acc Organ Soc 1990, 15(1/2):127-143.
57. Treasury Board Integrated risk management framework 2001, Treasury Board, Canadian Government, Ottawa.
58. Ungan M. Management support for the adoption of manufacturing best practices: key factors. Int J Prod Res 2005, 43(18):3803-3820.
59. Volberda H.W. Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ Sci 1996, 7(4):359-374.
60. Williams L.J., Edwards J.R., Vandenberg R.J. Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. J Manage 2003, 29(6):903-936.