Exploring the synergies of a hybrid BCI - VR neurorehabilitation system

2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Badia, Sergi Bermudez I ^a   Samaha, Hani ^b   Morgade, Andres Garcia ^b   Verschure, Paul F M J ^b,c  

^a MADEIRA INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

BCI; Mirror neurons; Motor imagery; Neuro feeback; Neurorehabilitation; Personalization; Virtual Reality

Indexed keywords

BCI; MIRROR NEURONS; MOTOR IMAGERY; NEURO-FEEBACK; NEUROREHABILITATION; PERSONALIZATIONS;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; SURVEYS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80052084255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICVR.2011.5971813     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. WHO, The global burden of disease: 2004 update. 2008, World Health Organization.
2. Mathers, C.D. and D. Loncar, Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med, 2006. 3(11): p. e442.
3. Nudo, R.J., Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke, 2007. 38(2 Suppl): p. 840-5. (Pubitemid 46184268)
4. Murphy, T.H. and D. Corbett, Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2009. 10(12): p. 861-72.
5. Seitz, R.J., et al., Reorganisation of cerebral circuits in human ischemic brain disease. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2004. 22(3-5): p. 207-29. (Pubitemid 39468281)
6. Sabatini, U., et al., Motor recovery after early brain damage. A case of brain plasticity. Stroke, 1994. 25(2): p. 514-7. (Pubitemid 24047287)
7. August, K., et al., FMRI analysis of neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation in virtual reality: activating secondary motor areas. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2006. 1: p. 3692-5. (Pubitemid 46520712)
8. Bhatt, E., et al., Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res, 2007. 182(4): p. 435-47. (Pubitemid 47403844)
9. Liepert, J., et al., Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett, 1998. 250(1): p. 5-8. (Pubitemid 28341763)
10. Rizzolatti, G. and L. Craighero, The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2004. 27: p. 169-92. (Pubitemid 39050401)
11. Altschuler, E.L., et al., Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. The Lancet, 1999. 353: p. 2035-2036. (Pubitemid 29271750)
12. Cameirao, M.S., S. Bermudez i Badia, and P.F.M.J. Verschure, Virtual Reality Based Upper Extremity Rehabilitation following Stroke: a Review. Journal of Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation, 2008. 1(1): p. 63-74.
13. Ertelt, D., et al., Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage, 2007. 36 Suppl 2: p. T164-73. (Pubitemid 46702737)
14. Merians, A.S., et al., Innovative approaches to the rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiparesis using virtual environments. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2009. 45(1): p. 123-33.
15. Broeren, J., et al., Assessment and training in a 3-dimensional virtual environment with haptics: a report on 5 cases of motor rehabilitation in the chronic stage after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007. 21(2): p. 180-9.
16. Todorov, E., R. Shadmehr, and E. Bizzi, Augmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task. J Mot Behav, 1997. 29(2): p. 147-158. (Pubitemid 27310631)
17. Prasad, G., et al. Using motor imagery based brain-computer interface for post-stroke rehabilitation. in 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. 2009: IEEE.
18. Daly, J. and J. Wolpaw, Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology, 2008. 7(11): p. 1032-1043.
19. Dobkin, B., Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. The Journal of Physiology, 2007. 579(3): p. 637.
20. Lucca, L.F., Virtual reality and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: a generation of progress? J Rehabil Med, 2009. 41(12): p. 1003-100.
21. Birbaumer, N., Breaking the silence: brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology, 2006. 43(6): p. 517-532. (Pubitemid 44657095)
22. Deng, J., J. Yao, and J. Dewald, Classification of the intention to generate a shoulder versus elbow torque by means of a time- frequency synthesized spatial patterns BCI algorithm. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2005. 2: p. 131.
23. Ang, K., et al. A clinical evaluation of non-invasive motor imagery- based brain-computer interface in stroke. 2008: IEEE.
24. Gaggioli, A., et al., A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2006. 20(4): p. 503.
25. Prabhakaran, S., et al., Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2008. 22(1): p. 64-71. (Pubitemid 350223138)
26. Ward, N.S., et al., The relationship between brain activity and peak grip force is modulated by corticospinal system integrity after subcortical stroke. Eur J Neurosci, 2007. 25(6): p. 1865-73. (Pubitemid 46550008)
27. Cameirao, M., et al., Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation, 2010. 7(1): p. 48.
28. Rand, D., N. Katz, and P.L. Weiss, Intervention using the VMall for improving motor and functional ability of the upper extremity in post stroke participants. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2009. 45(1): p. 113-21.
29. Tzounopoulos, T., et al., Coactivation of pre-and postsynaptic signaling mechanisms determines cell-specific spike-timing- dependent plasticity. Neuron, 2007. 54(2): p. 291-301. (Pubitemid 46561206)
30. Butefisch, C.M., R. Kleiser, and R.J. Seitz, Post-lesional cerebral reorganisation: evidence from functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Physiol Paris, 2006. 99(4-6): p. 437-54. (Pubitemid 43850796)
31. Butler, A.J. and S.J. Page, Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006. 87(12 Suppl 2): p. S2-11.
32. Gaggioli, A., et al., A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2006. 20(4): p. 503-7. (Pubitemid 44690632)
33. Stevens, J.A. and M.E. Stoykov, Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003. 84(7): p. 1090-2. (Pubitemid 36835143)
34. Zimmermann-Schlatter, A., et al., Efficacy of motor imagery in post- stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2008. 5: p. 8.
35. Solodkin, A., et al., Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex, 2004. 14(11): p. 1246-55. (Pubitemid 39391202)
36. Jasper, H., The 10-20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1958. 10: p. 371-375.
37. Egner, T. and J. Gruzelier, EEG Biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004. 115(1): p. 131-139. (Pubitemid 38045606)
38. Kanayama, N., A. Sato, and H. Ohira, Crossmodal effect with rubber hand illusion and gamma band activity. Psychophysiology, 2007. 44(3): p. 392-402. (Pubitemid 46587642)
39. Hatsopoulos, N., Rhythms in motor processing: functional implications for motor behavior. Short course organized by the Society for Neuroscience "Rhythms of the Neocortex: Where Do They Come From and What Are They Good For, 2009.
40. Oberman, L., V. Ramachandran, and J. Pineda, Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: the mirror neuron hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 2008. 46(5): p. 1558-1565.
41. Miltner, W., et al., Coherence of gamma-band EEG activity as a basis for associative learning. Nature, 1999. 397(6718): p. 434-435.
42. Hayashi, M., et al., Hemispheric asymmetry of frequency-dependent suppression in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during finger movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Cerebral Cortex, 2008.
43. Ward, N.S., et al., Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain, 2006. 129(Pt 3): p. 809-19. (Pubitemid 43278241)