Physical attractiveness influences reproductive success of modern men

Journal of Ethology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 453-458

  Prokop, P ^a,c   Fedor, Peter ^b,c  

^a TRNAVA UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^b Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

^c INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Homo sapiens sapiens; Reproductive success; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HOMO SAPIENS;

EID: 80052076937     PISSN: 02890771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10164-011-0274-0     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Baker RR, Bellis MA (1995) Human sperm competition: copulation masturbation and infidelity. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Borgerhoff Mulder M (2009) Serial monogamy as polygyny or polyandry? Marriage in the Tanzanian Pimbwe. Hum Nat 20: 130-150.
4. Buston PM, Emlen ST (2004) Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8805-8810.
5. Chambers ML, Hewitt JK, Schmitz S, Corley RP, Fulker DW (2001) Height, weight, and body mass index. In: Hewitt JK, Emde RN (eds) Infancy to early childhood: Genetic and environmental influences on developmental change. Oxford University Press, London, pp 292-306.
6. Cornwell RE, Perrett DI (2008) Sexy sons and sexy daughters: the influence of parents' facial characteristics on offspring. Anim Behav 76: 1843-1853.
7. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
8. De Pergola G, Maldera S, Tartagni M, Pannacciulli N, Loverro G, Giorgino R (2006) Inhibitory effect of obesity on gonadotropin, estradiol, and inhibin B levels in fertile women. Obesity 14: 1954-1960.
9. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Crawford JR, Welling LLM, Little AC (2010) The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc R Soc Lond B 277: 2405-2410.
10. Draper P, Hames R (2000) Birth order, sibling investment, and fertility among Ju/'hoansi (!Kung). Hum Nat 11: 117-156.
11. Gangestad SW, Buss DM (1993) Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethol Sociobiol 14: 89-96.
12. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (1997) The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol Hum Behav 18: 69-88.
13. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (2008) Human oestrus. Proc R Soc Lond B 275: 991-1000.
14. Gangestad SW, Garver-Apgar CE, Simpson JA, Cousins AJ (2007) Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. J Pers Soc Psychol 92: 151-163.
15. Goodman A, Koupil I (2010) The effect of school performance upon marriage and long-term reproductive success in 10, 000 Swedish males and females born 1915-1929. Evol Hum Behav 31: 425-435.
16. Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Manning JT (2005) Physical attractiveness and health: comment on Weeden and Sabini (2005). Psychol Bull 131: 658-661.
17. Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218: 384-387.
18. Henderson JA, Anglin JM (2003) Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evol Hum Behav 24: 351-356.
19. Hensley WE (1994) Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction. Adolescence 29: 469-474.
20. Hume DK, Montgomerie R (2001) Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of quality in men and women. Evol Hum Behav 22: 93-112.
21. Inwood K, Roberts E (2010) Longitudinal studies of human growth and health: a review of recent historical research. J Econ Surv 24: 801-840.
22. Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75: 21-64.
23. Jokela M (2009) Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evol Hum Behav 30: 342-350.
24. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Perrett DI, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Law Smith MJ (2008) Effects of menstrual cycle on face preferences. Arch Sex Behav 37: 78-84.
25. Kalick SM, Zebrowitz LA, Langlois JH, Johnson RM (1998) Does facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychol Sci 9: 8-13.
26. Kanazawa S (2007) Big and tall soldiers are more likely to survive battle: a possible explanation for the "Returning Soldier Effect" on the secondary sex ratio. Hum Reprod 22: 3002-3008.
27. Kaplan HJ, Lancaster B (2000) The evolutionary economics and psychology of the demographic transition to low fertility. In: Cronk L, Chagnon N, Irons W (eds) Evolutionary biology and human behavior: 20 years later. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, pp 283-322.
28. Koziel S, Pawlowski B (2003) Comparison between primary and secondary mate markets: an analysis of data from lonely hearts columns. Pers Individ Differ 35: 1849-1857.
29. Lie HC, Rhodes G, Simmons LW (2008) Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution 62: 2473-2486.
30. Lie HC, Simmons LW, Rhodes G (2010) Genetic dissimilarity, genetic diversity, and mate preferences in humans. Evol Hum Behav 31: 48-58.
31. Manfredini M, Breschi M, Mazzoni S (2010) Spouse selection by health status and physical traits. Sardinia, 1856-1925. Am J Phys Anthropol 141: 290-296.
32. Manning JT, Scutt D, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ (1997) Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evol Hum Behav 18: 223-236.
33. Michalski RL, Shackelford TK (2002) Birth order and sexual strategy. Pers Individ Differ 33: 661-667.
34. Milne F, Judge D (2009) Birth order influences reproductive measures in Australians. Hum Nat 20: 294-316.
35. Mueller U, Mazur A (2001) Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50: 302-311.
36. Nettle D (2002) Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Hum Nat 13: 473-491.
37. Nettle D, Pollet TV (2008) Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am Nat 172: 658-666.
38. Nunnaly J (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
39. Oberzaucher E, Grammer K (2010) Immune reactivity and attractiveness. Gerontology 56: 521-524.
40. Oliveira A, Ramos E, Lopes C, Barros H (2009) Self-reporting weight and height: misclassification effect on the risk estimates for acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Pub Health 19: 548-553.
41. Pawlowski B, Koziel S (2002) The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evol Hum Behav 23: 139-149.
42. Pawlowski B, Dunbar RIM, Lipowicz A (2000) Evolutionary fitness: tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403: 156.
43. Pawlowski B, Boothroyd LG, Perrett DI, Kluska S (2008) Is female attractiveness related to final reproductive success? Coll Antropol 32: 457-460.
44. Penton-Voak IS, Jacobson A, Trivers R (2004) Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol Hum Behav 25: 355-370.
45. Pierce CA (1996) Body height and romantic attraction: a meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Soc Behav Pers 24: 143-149.
46. Piñón R Jr (2002) Biology of human reproduction. University Science Books, Sausalito.
47. Prokop P, Obertová Z, Fedor P (2010) Paternity cues and mating opportunities: what makes fathers good? Acta Ethol 13: 101-107.
48. Rhodes G (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 57: 199-226.
49. Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW (2003) Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proc R Soc Lond B 270: S93-S95.
50. Rhodes G, Simmons LW, Peters M (2005) Attractiveness and sexual behavior: does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evol Hum Behav 26: 186-201.
51. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Jones BC, Perret DI, Carter V, Petrie M (2005) MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Biol Lett 1: 400-403.
52. Rolf C, Nieschlag E (1997) Senescence. In: Nieschlag E, Behere HM (eds) Andrology. Springer, Berlin, pp 397-407.
53. Rolf C, Nieschlag E (2001) Reproductive functions, fertility and genetic risks of ageing men. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diab 109: 68-74.
54. Sequoia JSP, Wright ME, McCarron P, Pietinen P, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Albanes D (2006) A prospective investigation of height and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 2174-2178.
55. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ (1999) Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evol Hum Behav 20: 71-76.
56. Shackelford TK, Weekes VA, LeBlanc GJ, Bleske AL, Euler HA, Hoier S (2000) Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Hum Nat 11: 299-306.
57. Silventoinen K, Kaprio J, Lahelma E, Viken RJ, Rose RJ (2001) Sex differences in genetic and environmental factors contributing to body-height. Twin Res 4: 25-29.
58. Silventoinen K, Zdravkovic S, Skytthe A, McCarron P, Herskind AM, Koskenvuo M, de Faire U, Pedersen N, Christensen K, Kaprio J (2006) Association between height and coronary heart disease mortality: a prospective study of 35, 000 twin pairs. Am J Epidemiol 163: 615-621.
59. Soler C, Nunez M, Gutierrez R, Nunez J, Medina P, Sancho M, Alvarez J, Nunez A (2003) Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evol Hum Behav 24: 199-207.
60. Song Y, Davey Smith G, Sung J (2003) Adult height and cause-specific mortality: a large prospective study of South Korean Men. Am J Epidemiol 158: 479-485.
61. Sorkin JD, Muller DC, Andres R (1999) Longitudinal change in height of men and women: implications for interpretation of the body mass index. Am J Epidemiol 150: 969-977.
62. Stearns SC, Byars SG, Govindaraju DR, Ewbank D (2010) Measuring selection in contemporary human populations. Nat Rev Genet 11: 611-622.
63. Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, New York.
64. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1994) Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychol Sci 5: 297-302.
65. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1999) Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 452-460.
66. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2006) Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Hum Behav 27: 131-144.
67. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Corner R (1995) Human female orgasm and male fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 50: 1601-1615.
68. Tuvemo T, Jonsson B, Persson I (1999) Intellectual and physical performance and morbidity in relation to height in a cohort of 18-year-old Swedish conscripts. Horm Res 52: 186-191.
69. Weeden J, Sabini J (2007) Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students. Arch Sex Behav 36: 79-88.
70. Weeden J, Abrams MJ, Green MC, Sabini J (2006) Do high-status people really have fewer children? Hum Nat 17: 377-392.
71. Wilcox A, Dunson D, Weinberg C, Trussell J, Day Baird D (2001) Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception 63: 211-215.
72. Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, van Noord PAH, Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J (1993) Fat and fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. Br Med J 306: 484-487.
73. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53: 205-214.