Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal Data on an Evolutionary Question

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 8-13

  Kalick, S Michael ^a   Zebrowitz, Leslie A ^b   Langlois, Judith H ^c   Johnson, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002191249     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00002     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adler, N.E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M.A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R.L., & Syme, S.L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15-24.
2. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bayer, L.M., & Snyder, M.M. (1950). Illness experience of a group of normal children. Child Development, 21, 93-120.
4. Bayer, L.M., Whissell-Buechy, D., & Honzik, M.P. (1981). Health in the middle years. In D.H. Eichorn, J.A. Clausen, N. Haan, M.P. Honzik, & P.H. Mussen (Eds.), Present and past in middle life (pp. 55-88). New York: Academic Press.
5. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157-215). New York: Academic Press.
6. Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D.P (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
7. Clausen, J. A. (1993). American lives: Looking back at the children of the Great Depression. New York: Free Press.
8. Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cunningham, M.R., Roberts, A.R., Barbee, A.P. Druen, P.B., & Wu, C.-H. (1995). "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261-279.
10. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
11. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
12. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J.R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282-309). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
13. Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1993). Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature, 361, 446-448.
14. Fisher, R.A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184-192.
15. Fisher, R.A. (1958). The genetical theory of natural selection (2nd ed.). New York: Dover.
16. Gangestad, S.W., & Buss, D.M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.
17. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242.
18. Hamilton, W.D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218, 384-387.
19. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20. Hollingshead, A.B., & Redlich, F.C. (1958). Social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.
21. Kramer, S., Zebrowitz, L.A., San Giovanni, J.P., & Sherak, B. (1995). Infant preferences for attractiveness and babyfaceness. In B.G. Bardy, R.J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action III (pp. 389-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA, 78, 3721-3725.
23. Langlois, J.H., Ritter, J.M., Roggman, L.A., & Vaughn, L.S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27, 79-84.
24. Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
25. Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A., Casey, R.J., Ritter, J.M., Rieser-Danner, L.A., & Jenkins, V.Y. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psvchology, 23, 363-369.
26. Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214-220.
27. Lipsey, M.W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Malgady, R.G. (1987). Contrasting part correlations in regression models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 961-965.
29. McClendon, M.J. (1994). Multiple regression and causal analysis. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
30. Milinski, M., & Bakker, T.C.M. (1990). Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, 344, 330-333.
31. Møller, A.P. (1990). Effects of a haematophagous mite on the barn swallow (hirundo rustica): A test of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. Evolution, 44, 771-784.
32. Møller, A.P. (1992). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357, 238-240.
33. Reis, H.T., Wheeler, L., Kernis, M.H., Spiegel, N., & Nezlek, J. (1985). On specificity in the impact of social participation on physical and psychological health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 456-471.
34. Ryan, M.J., Fox, J.H., Wilczynski, W., & Rand, A.S. (1990). Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343, 66-67.
35. Shackelford, T.K., & Larsen, R.J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456-466.
36. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
37. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Thornhill, R. (1992). Fluctuating asymmetry and the mating system of the Japanese scorpionfly. Panorpa japonica. Animal Behavior, 44, 867-879.
39. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness. symmetry. and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
40. Udry, J.R., & Eckland, B.K. (1984). Benefits of being attractive: Differential payoffs for men and women. Psychological Reports, 54, 47-56.
41. Wallace, A.R. (1889). Darwinism (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
42. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottmann, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
43. White, G.L. (1980). Physical attractiveness and courtship progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 660-668.
44. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection - A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
45. Zebrowitz, L.A., Montepare, J.M., & Lee, H.K. (1993). They don't all look alike: Individuated impressions of other racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 85-101.
46. Zebrowitz, L.A., Olson K., & Hoffman, K. (1993). Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 453-466.
47. Zebrowitz, L.A., Voinescu, L., & Collins, M.A. (1996). "Wide-eyed" and "crooked-faced": Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1258-1269.