Measuring selection in contemporary human populations

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 611-622

  Stearns, Stephen C ^a   Byars, Sean G ^a,b   Govindaraju, Diddahally R ^c   Ewbank, Douglas ^d  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FERTILITY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; MENOPAUSE; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REVIEW;

CULTURE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 77955924181     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2831     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. Barreiro, L. B. & Quintana-Murci, L. From evolutionarygenetics to human immunology: how selection shapeshost defence genes. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 17-30(2010).
2. Bradley, B. J. Reconstructing phylogenies andphenotypes: a molecular view of human evolution.J. Anat. 212, 337-353 (2008).
3. Han, Y. et al. Evidence of positive selection on a class IADH locus. Amer J. Hum. Genet. 80, 441-456(2007).
4. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. & Myles, S. How cultureshaped the human genome: bringing genetics and thehuman sciences together. Nature Rev. Genet. 11,137-148 (2010).
5. Tishkoff, S. A. et al. Convergent adaptation of humanlactase persistence in Africa and Europe. NatureGenet. 39, 31-40 (2007).
6. Perry, G. H. et al. Diet and the evolution of humanamylase gene copy number variation. Nature Genet.39, 1256-1260 (2007).
7. Cavalli-Sforza, L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. The Historyand Geography of Human Genes. Princeton UniversityPress, Princeton, 1994).
8. Biswas, S. & Akey, J. Genomic insights into positiveselection. Trends Genet. 22, 437-446 (2006).
9. Grossman, S. R. et al. A composite of multiple signalsdistinguishes causal variants in regions of positiveselection. Science 12, 883-886 (2010).
10. Novembre, J. & Di Rienzo, A. Spatial patterns ofvariation due to natural selection in humans. NatureRev. Genet. 10, 745-755 (2009).
11. Sabeti, P. et al. Positive natural selection in the humanlineage. Science 312, 1614-1620 (2006).
12. Byars, S. G., Ewbank, D., Govindaraju, D. R. &Stearns, S. C. Natural selection in a contemporaryhuman population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107,1787-1792 2010).
13. Castelli, W. P. & Anderson, K. A population at risk.Prevalence of high cholesterol levels in hypertensivepatients in the Framingham Study. Am. J. Med. 80,23-32 (1986).
14. Stearns, S. C., Nesse, R. M., Govindaraju, D. R. &Ellison, P. T. Evolutionary perspectives on healthand medicine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107,1691-1695 2010).
15. Boomsma, D. I. Twin registers in Europe: an overview.Twin Research 1, 34-51 (1998).
16. Pedersen, C. B., Gotzsche, H., Moller, J. O. &Mortensen, P. B. The Danish Civil Registration System\a cohort of eight million persons. Danish Med. Bull.53, 441-449 (2006).
17. Kaar, P., Jokela, J., Helle, T. & Kojola, I. Direct andcorrelative phenotypic selection on life-history traits inthree pre-industrial human populations. Proc. R. Soc.Lond. B 263, 1475-1480 (1996).
18. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age?StructuredPopulations 2nd edn Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 1994).
19. McGraw, J. & Caswell, H. Estimation of individualfitness from life-history data. Am. Nat. 147, 47-64(1996).
20. Schonemann, P. On models and muddles of heritability.Genetica 99, 97-108 (1997).
21. Stinchcombe, J. et al. Testing for environmentallyinduced bias in phenotypic estimates of naturalselection: theory and practice. Am. Nat. 160, 511-523(2002).
22. Coulson, T. & Tuljapurkar, S. The dynamics of aquantitative trait in an age-structured population livingin a variable environment. Am. Nat. 172, 599-612(2008).
23. Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. Generalized AdditiveModels. Chapman and Hall, London, 1990).
24. Cleveland, W. S. Robust locally weighted regressionand smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74,829-836 (1979).
25. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. The measurement of selection oncorrelated characters Evolution 37, 1210-1226 1983).
26. Lande, R. Quantitative genetic-analysis of multivariateevolution, applied to brain-body size allometry.Evolution 33, 402-416 (1979).
27. Robertson, A. A mathematical model of the cullingprocess in dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 8, 95-108 1966).A prescient contribution that anticipated bothLande and Arnold's approach and Price'scovariance theory and provided the basis for muchof selection theory in plant and animal breeding.
28. Blangero, J., Almasy, L., Dyer, T. & Peterson, C.Sequential oligogenic linkage analysis routings. Solar Version 1.4. SOLAR [online], http://solar.sfbrgenetics.org (1999).
29. Abecasis, G. R., Cherny, S. S., Cookson, W. O. &Cardon, L. R. Merlin\rapid analysis of dense geneticmaps using sparse gene flow trees. Nature Genet. 30,97-101 (2002).
30. Neumaier, A. & Groeneveld, E. Restricted maximumlikelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linearmodels. Genet. Selection Evolution 30, 3-26 (1998).
31. Pettay, J., Kruuk, L., Jokela, J. & Lummaa, V.Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history traitevolution in preindustrial humans. Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA 102, 2838-2843 (2005).
32. Blows, M. W. A tale of two matrices: multivariateapproaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20,1-8 (2007).
33. Brodie, E., Moore, A. & Janzen, F. Visualizing andquantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10,313-318 (1995).
34. Janzen, F. & Stern, H. Logistic regression for empiricalstudies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52,1564-1571 (1998).
35. Kruuk, L. E. B. & Garant, D. A wake-up call for studiesof natural selection? J. Evol. Biol. 20, 30-33 (2007).
36. Ovaskainen, O., Cano, J. M. & Merila, J. A Bayesianframework for comparative quantitative genetics.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275, 669-678 (2008).
37. Schluter, D. Estimating the form of natural selectionon a quantitative trait Evolution 42, 849-861 (1988).
38. Stinchcombe, J. R., Agrawal, A. F., Hohenlohe, P. A.,Arnold, S. J. & Blows, M. W. Estimating nonlinearselection gradients using quadratic regressioncoefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62,2435-2440 (2008).
39. Blows, M. W. & Brooks, R. Measuring nonlinearselection. Am. Nat. 162, 815-820 (2003).
40. Schluter, D. & Nychka, D. Exploring fitness surfaces.Am. Nat. 143, 597-616 (1994).
41. Kingsolver, J. G. et al. The strength of phenotypicselection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157,245-261 (2001).
42. Stearns, S. & Koella, J. The evolution of phenotypicplasticity in life history traits\predictions of reactionnorms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40,893-913 (1986).
43. Sear, R., Allal, N., Mace, R. & Mcgregor, I. Height andreproductive success among Gambian women.Am. J. Hum. Biol. 16, 223-223 (2004).
44. Mueller, U. & Mazur, A. Evidence of unconstraineddirectional selection for male tallness. Behav. Ecol.Sociobiol. 50, 302-311 (2001).
45. Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M. & Lipowicz, A.Evolutionary fitness\tall men have more reproductivesuccess. Nature 403, 156-156 (2000).
46. Sear, R. Height and reproductive success\how aGambian population compares with the West. Hum.Nat. 17, 405-418 (2006).
47. Nettle, D. Height and reproductive success in a cohortof British men. Hum. Nat. 13, 473-491 (2002).
48. Silventoinen, K., Lahelma, E. & Rahkonen, O.Social background, adult body-height and health.Int. J. Epidemiol. 28, 911-918 (1999).
49. Heliovaara, M., Makela, M., Knekt, P., Impivaara, O. &Aromaa, A. Determinants of sciatica andlow-back-pain. Spine 16, 608-614 (1991).
50. Michaud, D. S. et al. Physical activity, obesity, height,and the risk of pancreatic cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc.286, 921-929 (2001).
51. Shors, A. R., Solomon, C., McTiernan, A. & White, E.Melanoma risk in relation to height, weight, andexercise (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12,599-606 (2001).
52. Ramsden, E. A differential paradox: the controversysurrounding the Scottish mental surveys of intelligenceand family size. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 43, 109-134(2007).A superb study in the recent history of science. Thispaper tells the intriguing story of how intelligencewas predicted to decline under selection but in factincreased.
53. Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G. & Wray, N. R. Heritability inthe genomics era\concepts and misconceptions.Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 255-266 2008).A masterly introduction to the heritability concept.
54. Mousseau, T. & Roff, D. Natural selection and theheritability of fitness components. Heredity 59,181-197 (1987).
55. Stearns, S., De Jong, G. & Newman, B. The effects ofphenotypic plasticity on genetic correlations. TrendsEcol. Evol. 6, 122-126 (1991).
56. Hill, W. G. Genetics. A century of corn selection.Science 307, 683-684 (2005).
57. Laurie, C. C. et al. The genetic architecture of responseto long-term artificial selection for oil concentration inthe maize kernel. Genetics 168, 2141-2155 (2004).
58. Tait, L. Has the law of natural selection by survival ofthe fittest failed in the case of man? Dublin QuartJ. Med. Sci. 47, 102-113 (1869).
59. Groth, P. & Weiss, B. Phenotype data: A neglectedresource in biomedical research? Curr. Bioinform 1,347-358 (2006).
60. Houle, D. Numbering the hairs on our heads:the shared challenge and promise of phenomics.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1793-1799 (2010).
61. Denny, J. C. et al. PheWAS: demonstrating thefeasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discovergene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26,1205-1210 (2010).
62. van Driel, M., Bruggeman, J., Vriend, G., Brunner, H.& Leunissen, J. A text-mining analysis of the humanphenome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 535-542 (2006).
63. Oti, M., Huynen, M. A. & Brunner, H. G. The biologicalcoherence of human phenome databases. Am. J. Hum.Genet. 85, 801-808 (2009).
64. Bilder, R. M. Phenomics: Building scaffolds forbiological hypotheses in the post-genomic era.Biol. Psychiatry 63, 439-440 (2008).
65. Bouchard, T. J. Genetic influence on humanintelligence Spearman's g): how much? Ann. Hum.Biol. 36, 527-544 (2009).
66. Austin, M. A. et al. Genetics of LDL subclassphenotypes in women twins\concordance,heritability, and commingling analysis. Arterioscler.Thromb. 13, 687-695 (1993).
67. Baare, W. F. C. et al. Quantitative genetic modeling ofvariation in human brain morphology. Cereb. Cortex11, 816-824 (2001).
68. Beardsall, K. et al. Heritability of childhood weightgain from birth and risk markers for adult metabolicdisease in prepubertal twins. J. Clin. Endocrinol.Metab. 94, 3708-3713 (2009).
69. Bella, J. N. et al. Genetic influences on aortic root sizein American Indians\the Strong Heart Study.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 1008-1011(2002).
70. Brown, W. M. et al. Age-stratified heritabilityestimation in the Framingham Heart Study families.BMC Genet. 4 (Suppl. 1), 32 (2003).
71. Busjahn, A. et al. β-2 adrenergic receptor genevariations, blood pressure, and heart size in normaltwins. Hypertension 35, 555-560 (2000).
72. Byard, P. J., Poosha, D. V. R. & Satyanarayana, M.Genetic and environmental determinants of height andweight in families from Andhra Pradesh, India. Hum.Biol. 57, 621-633 (1985).
73. Carmichael, C. M. & Mcgue, M. A cross-sectionalexamination of height, weight, and body-mass index inadult twins. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 50,B237-B244 (1995).
74. Clark, P. J. The heritability of certain anthropometriccharacters as ascertained from measurements oftwins. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 8, 49-54 (1956).
75. Dahlberg, G. Twin Births and Twins from a HereditaryPoint of View Tidens Tryckeri, Stockholm, 1926).
76. Darocha, F. J., Salzano, F. M., Callegar, S. M. &Pena, H. F. New studies on heritability of anthropometriccharacteristics as ascertained from twins. Acta Genet.Med. Gemellol. 21, 125-134 (1972).
77. de Bruin, J. P. et al. The role of genetic factors in ageat natural menopause. Hum. Reprod. 16, 2014-2018(2001).
78. de Oliveira, C. M., Pereira, A. C., de Andrade, M.,Soler, J. M. & Krieger, J. E. Heritability ofcardiovascular risk factors in a Brazilian population:Baependi Heart Study. BMC Med. Genet. 9, 1-8(2008).
79. Decastro, J. M. Genetic influences on daily intakeand meal patterns of humans. Physiol. Behav. 53,777-782 (1993).
80. Deng, H. W. et al. A whole-genome linkage scansuggests several genomic regions potentiallycontaining QTLs underlying the variation of stature.Am. J. Med. Genet. 113, 29-39 (2002).
81. Fischbein, S. Intra-pair similarity in physical growth ofmonozygotic and of dizygotic twins during puberty.Ann. Hum. Biol. 4, 417-430 (1977).
82. Furusho, T. On manifestation of genotypes responsiblefor stature. Hum. Biol. 40, 437-455 (1968).
83. Garner, C. et al. Genetic and environmental influenceson left ventricular mass\a family study.Hypertension 36, 740-746 (2000).
84. Hammond, C. J., Snieder, H., Spector, T. D. &Gilbert, C. E. Factors affecting pupil size afterdilatation: the Twin Eye Study. Br. J. Ophthalmol 84,1173-1176 (2000).
85. Hansen, P. S. et al. Genetic and environmental causesof individual differences in thyroid size: a study ofhealthy Danish twins. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89,2071-2077 (2004).
86. Harrap, S. B., Stebbing, M., Hopper, J. L., Hoang, H. N.& Giles, G. G. Familial patterns of covariation forcardiovascular risk factors in adults\the VictorianFamily Heart Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152, 704-715(2000).
87. Hauspie, R. C., Bergman, P., Bielicki, T. & Susanne, C.Genetic variance in the pattern of the growth curve forheight\a longitudinal analysis of male twins. AnnalsHum. Biol. 21, 347-362 (1994).
88. Hawk, L. J. & Brook, C. G. D. Family resemblances ofheight, weight, and body fatness. Arch. Dis. Child. 54,877-879 (1979).
89. Hewitt, J. K., Stunkard, A. J., Carroll, D., Sims, J. &Turner, J. R. A twin study approach towardsunderstanding genetic contributions to body sizeand metabolic-rate. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 40,133-146 (1991).
90. Hunter, D. J., Snieder, H., March, L. & Sambrook, P. N.Genetic contribution to cartilage volume in women:a classical twin study. Rheumatology 42, 1495-1500(2003).
91. Kohler, H. P. & Christensen, K. in Genetic Influences onHuman Fertility and Sexuality eds Rodgers, J. L.,Rower, D. C. & Miller, W. B.) 67-84 Kluwer, Boston,2000).
92. Kohler, H. P., Rodgers, J. L. & Christensen, K.Between nurture and nature: the shifting determinantsof female fertility in Danish twin cohorts. Soc. Biol. 49,218-248 (2002).
93. Kosova, G., Abney, M. & Ober, C. Heritability ofreproductive fitness traits in a human population.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1772-1778 (2010).
94. Liu, X. Q., Hanley, A. J. G. & Paterson, A. D.Genetic analysis of common factors underlyingcardiovascular disease-related traits. BMC Genet. 4,S56 (2003).
95. Peccei, J. S. Genetic correlation between the ages ofmenarche and menopause. Hum. Nature 11, 43-63(2000).
96. Pilia, G. et al. Heritability of cardiovascular andpersonality traits in 6,148 Sardinians. PLoS Genet. 2,e132 (2006).
97. Wang, Z. Q., Ouyang, Z., Wang, D. M. & Tang, X. L.Heritability of blood-pressure in 7-year-old to12-year-old Chinese twins, with special referenceto body size effects. Genet. Epidemiol. 7, 447-452(1990).
98. Jokela, M. Physical attractiveness and reproductivesuccess in humans: evidence from the late 20thcentury United States. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30,342-350 (2009).
99. Wollmering, E. Wisconsin Longitudinal StudyHandbook 12.10.07) (University of Wisconsin\Madison, Madison, 2007).
100. Nettle, D. Women's height, reproductive success andthe evolution of sexual dimorphpag in modernhumans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1919-1923(2002).
101. Barker, D. J. P., Osmond, C., Forsén, T. J., Kajantie, E.& Eriksson, J. G. Trajectories of growth among childrenwho have coronary events as adults. N. Engl. J. Med.353, 1802-1809 (2005).
102. Pesonen, A.-K. et al. Reproductive traits following aparent-child separation trauma during childhood:a natural experiment during World War II. Am. J. Hum.Biol. 20, 345-351 (2008).
103. Abney, M., McPeek, M. S. & Ober, C. Estimation ofvariance components of quantitative traits in inbredpopulations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 629-650 (2000).
104. Glasson, E. J. et al. Perinatal factors and thedevelopment of autism\a population study.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 618-627 (2004).
105. Mitchell, B. D. et al. Genetic and environmentalcontributions to cardiovascular risk factors in MexicanAmericans. The San Antonio Family Heart Study.Circulation 94, 2159-2170 (1996).
106. Niazi, T. N., Cannon-Albright, L. A. & Couldwell, W. T.Utah Population Database: a tool to study thehereditary element of nonsyndromic neurosurgicaldiseases. Neurosurg. Focus 28, E1 (2010).
107. Higgins, M. et al. NHLBI Family Heart Study:objectives and design. Am. J. Epidemiol. 143,1219-1228 (1996).
108. Siest, G. et al. Objectives, design and recruitment of afamilial and longitudinal cohort for studying gene-environment interactions in the field of cardiovascularrisk: the Stanislas cohort. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 36,35-42 (1998).
109. Helle, S., Lummaa, V. & Jokela, J. Are reproductiveand somatic senescence coupled in humans? Late,but not early, reproduction correlated with longevity inhistorical Sami women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272,29-37 (2005).
110. Helle, S. A tradeoff between reproduction and growthin contemporary Finnish women. Evol. Hum. Behav.29, 189-195 (2008).
111. Kirk, K. M. et al. Natural selection and quantitativegenetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twinstudy. Evolution 55, 423-435 (2001).
112. Weeden, J., Abrams, M. J., Green, M. C. & Sabini, J.Do high-status people really have fewer children?Education, income, and fertility in the contemporaryUS. Hum. Nat.17, 377-392 (2006).
113. Kaar, P., Jokela, J., Helle, T. & Kojola, I.Direct and correlative phenotypic selection onlife-history traits in three pre-industrial humanpopulations. Proc R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1475-1480(1996).
114. Mealey, L. The relationship between social-status andbiological success\a case-study of the Mormonreligious hierarchy. Ethol. Sociobiol. 6, 249-257(1985).
115. Bailey, S. M. & Garn, S. M. Socioeconomic interactionswith physique and fertility. Hum. Biol. 51, 317-333(1979).
116. Vetta, A. Fertility, physique, and intensity of selection.Hum. Biol. 47, 283-293 (1975).
117. Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. & Lipowicz, A. Evolutionaryfitness\tall men have more reproductive success.Nature 403, 156-156 (2000).
118. Fieder, M. & Huber, S. The effects of sex andchildlessness on the association between status andreproductive output in modern society. Evol. Hum.Behav. 28, 392-398 (2007).
119. Hopcroft, R. L. Sex, status, and reproductive successin the contemporary United States. Evol. Hum. Behav.27, 104-120 (2006).
120. Fieder, M. & Huber, S. The effects of sex andchildlessness on the association between status andreproductive output in modern society. Evol. Hum.Behav. 28, 392-398 (2007).
121. Nettle, D. & Pollet, T. V. Natural selection on malewealth in humans. Am. Nat. 172, 658-666 (2008).
122. Bean, F. D. & Wood, C. H. Ethnic variations inrelationship between income and fertility. Demography11, 629-640 (1974).
123. Mulder, M. B. On cultural and reproductive success\Kipsigis evidence. Am. Anthropol. 89, 617-634(1987).
124. Low, B. S. Occupational status, landownership, andreproductive behavior in 19th-century Sweden: TunaParish. Am. Anthropol. 92, 457-468 (1990).
125. Wiessner, P. Hunting, healing, and hxaro exchange\a long-term perspective on!Kung Ju/'hoansi) largegamehunting. Evol. Hum. Behav. 23, 407-436(2002).