A model for estimating the minimum number of offspring to sample in studies of reproductive success

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 567-576

  Anderson, Joseph H ^a,b   Ward, Eric J ^a,b   Carlson, Stephanie M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

natural selection; negative binomial; parentage; pedigree; power; salmonid; sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC DATABASE; HATCHING; MALE; NONHUMAN; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PARENT; PARENTHOOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID; SAMPLE SIZE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION; SALMONIDAE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

AMPHIBIA; HEXAPODA; PISCES; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 80052061557     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr060     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA. 2002. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 36:19-45. (Pubitemid 36109182)
2. Baumsteiger J, Hand DM, Olson DE, Spateholts R, FitzGerald G, Ardren WR. 2008. Use of parentage analysis to determine reproductive success of hatchery-origin spring Chinook salmon outplanted into Shitike Creek, Oregon. N Am J Fish Manag. 28:1472-1485.
3. Bernatchez L, Duchesne P. 2000. Individual-based genotype analysis in studies of parentage and population assignment: how many loci, how many alleles? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 57:1-12. (Pubitemid 30205691)
4. Clutton-Brock TH. 1988. Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
5. DeWoody JA, DeWoody YD, Fiumera AC, Avise JC. 2000. On the number of reproductives contributing to a half-sib progeny array. Genet Res. 75:95-105. (Pubitemid 30135862)
6. Esteve M. 2005. Observations of spawning behavior in Salmonidae: Salmo, Oncorhynchus and Salvelinus. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 15:1-21. (Pubitemid 43012769)
7. Ford MJ, Fuss H, Boelts B, LaHood E, Hard J, Miller J. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery production. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63:2343-2355. (Pubitemid 44812814)
8. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L. 2001. A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Hered. 92:137-145. (Pubitemid 32521984)
9. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L. 2003. Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution. 57:1111-1141.
10. Gopurenko D, Williams RN, DeWoody JA. 2007. Reproductive and mating success in the small-mouthed salamander (Ambystoma texanum) estimated via microsatellite parentage analysis. Evol Biol. 34:130-139.
11. Gopurenko D, Williams RN, McCormick CR, DeWoody JA. 2006. Insights into the mating habits of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum) as revealed by genetics parentage analyses. Mol Ecol. 15:1917-1928. (Pubitemid 43725675)
12. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The ecological detective. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
13. Hinrichsen RA. 2003. The power of experiments for estimating relative reproductive success of hatchery-born spawners. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60:864-872. (Pubitemid 37284106)
14. Jones AG, Ardren WR. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 12:2511-2523. (Pubitemid 37195892)
15. Jones AG, Arguello JR, Arnold SJ. 2002. Validation of Batemans principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc R Soc Ser B Biol Sci. 269:2533-2539. (Pubitemid 36071833)
16. Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL. 2010. A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Mol Ecol Res. 10:6-30.
17. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
18. Liebgold EB, Cabe PR, Jaeger RG, Leberg PL. 2006. Multiple paternity in a salamander with socially monogamous behavior. Mol Ecol. 15:4153-4160. (Pubitemid 44607158)
19. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L.E.B, Pemberton JM. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 7:639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
20. Moore JW, Semmens BX. 2008. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett. 11:470-480. (Pubitemid 351499224)
21. Morrissey MB, Wilson AJ. 2005. The potential costs of accounting for genotypics errors in molecular parentage analyses. Mol Ecol. 14:4111-4121. (Pubitemid 44943741)
22. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR. 2000. Statistical confidence in parentage analysis with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed? Mol Ecol. 9:529-539. (Pubitemid 30259521)
23. Quinn TP. 2005. The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press.
24. Rubin DB. 1988. Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. In: Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian statistics 3. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 395-402.
25. Seamons TR, Bentzen P, Quinn TP. 2004. The effects of adult length and arrival date on individual reproductive success in wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 61:193-204. (Pubitemid 38729903)
26. Seamons TR, Bentzen P, Quinn TP. 2007. DNA parentage analysis reveals inter-annual variation in selection: results from 19 consecutive brood years in steelhead trout. Evol Ecol Res. 9:409-431. (Pubitemid 46713414)
27. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
28. Solow AR. 1994. On the Bayesian estimation of the number of species in a community. Ecology. 75:2139-2142. (Pubitemid 2152869)
29. Tatarenkov A, Healey CIM, Grether GF, Avise JC. 2008. Pronounced reproductive skew in a natural population of green swordtails, Xiphophorus helleri. Mol Ecol. 17:4522-4534.
30. Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer.
31. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall.