Ultrastructural investigation of intact orbital implant surfaces using atomic force microscopy

Scanning

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 211-221

  Choi, Samjin ^a   Lee, Seung Jun ^b   Shin, Jae Ho ^c   Cheong, Youjin ^a   Lee, Hui Jae ^b   Paek, Joo Hee ^d   Kim, Jae Sik ^d   Jin, Kyung Hyun ^a   Park, Hun Kuk ^a,d  

^a Kyung Hee University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^c Kyung Hee University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

atomic force microscopy; nonporous poly(methyl methacrylate); orbital implants; porous aluminum oxide; porous polyethylene

Indexed keywords

AFM; ALUMINUM OXIDES; MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTIC; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; POLYETHYLENE IMPLANTS; POROUS ALUMINUM OXIDE; POROUS POLYETHYLENE; POROUS STRUCTURES; SURFACE IRREGULARITIES; SURFACE NANOSTRUCTURE;

ADHESION; ALUMINUM; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; DEBRIS; ESTERS; NANOSTRUCTURES; OXIDES; POLYETHYLENES; THERMOPLASTICS;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; NANOMATERIAL; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ORBIT IMPLANT; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYETHYLENES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 80052022937     PISSN: 01610457     EISSN: 19328745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sca.20235     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Apple DJ, Peng Q, Visessook N, Werner L, Pandey SK, Escobar-Gomez M, Ram J, Auffarth GU,. 2001. Eradication of posterior capsule opacification; documentation of a marked decrease in Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy rates noted in an analysis of 5416 pseudophakic human eyes obtained postmortem. Ophthalmology 108: 505-518. (Pubitemid 32179893)
2. Beard C,. 1995. Remarks on historical and newer approaches to orbital implants. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 11: 89-90.
3. Bigham WJ, Stanley P, Cahill Jr JM, Curran RW, Perry AC,. 1999. Fibrovascular ingrowth in porous ocular implants: the effect of material composition, porosity, growth factors, and coatings. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15: 317-325. (Pubitemid 32118260)
4. Chalasani R, Poole-Warren L, Conway RM, Ben-Nissan B,. 2007. Porous orbital implants in enucleation: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 52: 145-155. (Pubitemid 46367857)
5. Charters L,. 2001. Aluminum oxide orbital implant has better biocompatibility. Ophthalmology Times. Oculoplastics special report.
6. Chen YH, Cui HG,. 2006. High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 7: 679-682.
7. Choi S, Cheong Y, Lee G-J, Park H-K,. 2010a. Changes in primary and permanent tooth surfaces by 37% phosphoric acid-etching with and without fluoride applications. Scanning 32: 375-382.
8. Choi S, Rhee Y, Park J-H, Lee G-J, Kim K-S, Park J-H, Park Y-G, Park H-K,. 2010b. Effects of fluoride treatment on phosphoric acid-etching in primary teeth: an AFM observation. Micron 41: 498-506.
9. Christel PS,. 1992. Biocompatibility of surgical-grade dense polycrystalline alumina. Clin Orthop Relat Res 282: 10-18.
10. Christmas NJ, Craig GD, Murray TG, Tse D, Johnson T, Garonzik S, O'Brien JM,. 1998. Intraorbital implants after enucleation and their complications: a 10-year review. Arch Ophthalmol 116: 1199-1203. (Pubitemid 29106441)
11. Christmas NJ, Van Quill K, Murray TG, Gordon CD, Garonzik S, Tse D, Johnson T, Schiffman J, O'Brien JM,. 2000. Evaluation of efficacy and complications: primary pediatric orbital implants after enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 118: 503-506. (Pubitemid 30203145)
12. Custer PL,. 2000. Enucleation: past, present, and future. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16: 316-321.
13. Custer PL, McCaffery S,. 2006. Complications of sclera-covered enucleation implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 22: 269-273. (Pubitemid 44510126)
14. Custer PL, Kennedy RH, Woog JJ, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR,. 2003. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 110: 2054-2061. (Pubitemid 37163330)
15. Davison JA,. 2004. Neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy after implantation of AcrySof intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 1492-1500. (Pubitemid 38802894)
16. Dutton JJ,. 1991. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology 98: 370-377.
17. Fan JT, Robertson DM,. 1995. Long-term follow-up of the Allen implant (1967-1991). Ophthalmology 102: 510-516.
18. Gayre GS, DeBacker C, Lipham W, Tawfik HA, Holck D, Dutton JJ,. 2001. Bovine pericardium as a wrapping for orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 17: 381-387. (Pubitemid 32938968)
19. Gayre GS, Lipham W, Dutton JJ,. 2002. A comparison of rates of fibrovascular ingrowth in wrapped versus unwrapped hydroxyapatite spheres in a rabbit model. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18: 275-280. (Pubitemid 34809582)
20. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F,. 2001. Changes in posterior capsule opacification after poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 27: 817-824.
21. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, Pande MV,. 1998. Lens epithelial cell regression on the posterior capsule with different intraocular lens materials. Br J Ophthalmol 82: 1182-1188. (Pubitemid 28474876)
22. Hornblass A, Biesman BS, Eviatar JA,. 1995. Current techniques of enucleation: a survey of 5439 intraorbital implants and a review of the literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 11: 77-88.
23. Jordan DR, Klapper SR,. 1999. Wrapping hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30: 403-407. (Pubitemid 29227953)
24. Jordan DR, Klapper SR,. 2006. Anophthalmic orbital implants: current concepts and controversies. Medscape.
25. Jordan DR, Anderson RL, Nerad JA, Allen L,. 1987. A preliminary report on the Universal implant. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 1726-1731. (Pubitemid 18009201)
26. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn L, Brownstein S, Grahovac SZ,. 1998. The synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: a report on 65 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14: 250-255. (Pubitemid 28363601)
27. Josset Y, Oum'Hamed Z, Zarrinpour A, Lorenzato M, Adnet JJ, Laurent-Maquin D,. 1999. In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia and alumina ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 47: 481-493. (Pubitemid 29468552)
28. Kao SC, Chen S,. 1999. The use of rectus abdominis sheath for wrapping of the hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30: 69-71. (Pubitemid 29042512)
29. Karcioglu ZA, Al-Mesfer SA, Mullaney PB,. 1998. Porous polyethylene orbital implant in patients with retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology 105: 1311-1316. (Pubitemid 28470905)
30. Karesh JW, Dresner SC,. 1994. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology 101: 1688-1696. (Pubitemid 24348396)
31. Li ZH, Zhang P, Zhang HP, Wu YP, Zhou XD,. 2008. A lotus root-like porous nanocomposite polymer electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 10: 791-794.
32. Lombardo M, De Santo MP, Lombardo G, Barberi R, Serrao S,. 2006. Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1378-1384. (Pubitemid 44096984)
33. Lombardo M, Carbone G, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Barberi R,. 2009. Analysis of intraocular lens surface adhesiveness by atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35: 1266-1272.
34. Luce CM,. 1970. A short history of enucleation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 10: 681-687.
35. Mawn LA, Jordan DR, Gilberg S,. 1998. Scanning electron microscopic examination of porous orbital implants. Can J Ophthalmol 33: 203-209. (Pubitemid 29103857)
36. Mawn LA, Jordan DR, Gilberg S,. 2001. Proliferation of human fibroblasts in vitro after exposure to orbital implants. Can J Ophthalmol 36: 245-251. (Pubitemid 34188581)
37. Meek KM, Fullwood NJ,. 2001. Corneal and scleral collagens-a microscopist's perspective. Micron 32: 261-272.
38. Meller D, Peters K, Meller K,. 1997. Human cornea and sclera studied by atomic force microscopy. Cell Tissue Res 288: 111-118. (Pubitemid 27136149)
39. Müllner-Eidenböck A, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Abela C, Petternel V, Zidek T,. 2001. Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 27: 734-740. (Pubitemid 32467323)
40. Naugle TC, Lee AM, Haik BG, Callahan MA,. 1999. Wrapping hydroxyapatite orbital implants with posterior auricular muscle complex grafts. Am J Ophthalmol 128: 495-501. (Pubitemid 29479325)
41. Nishi O, Nishi K, Osakabe Y,. 2004. Effect of intraocular lenses on preventing posterior capsule opacification: design versus material. J Cataract Refract Surg 30: 2170-2176. (Pubitemid 39330677)
42. Nunery WR,. 2001. Risk of prion transmission with the use of xenografts and allografts in surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 17: 389-394. (Pubitemid 33116888)
43. Nunery WR, Heinz GW, Bonnin JM, Martin RT, Cepela MA,. 1993. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 9: 96-104. (Pubitemid 23182907)
44. Oestreicher JH,. 1994. Treatment of exposed coral implant after failed scleral patch graft. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10: 110-113. (Pubitemid 24179577)
45. Oestreicher JH, Liu E, Berkowitz M,. 1997. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: A review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology 104: 324-329. (Pubitemid 27088111)
46. Perry AC,. 1990. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 8: 75-81.
47. Perry AC,. 1991. Advances in enucleation. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 4: 173-182.
48. Rubin PA, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW,. 1994. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10: 96-103. (Pubitemid 24179575)
49. Shields CL, Shields JA, Eagle RC, De Potter P,. 1991. Histopathologic evidence of fibrovascular ingrowth four weeks after implantation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol 111: 363-366.
50. Tanaka T, Shigeta M, Yamanaka N, Usui M,. 2005. Cell adhesion to acrylic intraocular lens associated with lens surface properties. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 1648-1651. (Pubitemid 41208048)
51. Trichopoulos N, Augsburger JJ,. 2005. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 21: 331-336. (Pubitemid 41464080)
52. Tyers AG, Collin JR,. 1985. Baseball orbital implants: a review of 39 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 69: 438-442. (Pubitemid 15059059)
53. Van Acker E, De Potter P,. 2001. Porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant. Prospective study of 75 primary implantations. J Fr Ophtalmol 24: 1067-1073. (Pubitemid 34027229)
54. Wellisz T,. 1993. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg 17: 339-344. (Pubitemid 23315127)
55. Yamamoto S, Hitomi J, Sawaguchi S, Abe H, Shigeno M, Ushiki T,. 2002. Observation of human corneal and scleral collagen fibrils by atomic force microscopy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 46: 496-501. (Pubitemid 35380002)
56. Ziebarth NM, Wojcikiewicz EP, Manns F, Moy VT, Parel JM,. 2007. Atomic force microscopy measurements of lens elasticity in monkey eyes. Mol Vis 2: 504-510. (Pubitemid 46534770)