Dihydronaphthalenones from endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. BCC14842

Tetrahedron

Volumn 67, Issue 39, 2011, Pages 7540-7547

  Kornsakulkarn, Jittra ^a   Dolsophon, Kulvadee ^b   Boonyuen, Nattawut ^a   Boonruangprapa, Tanapong ^a   Rachtawee, Pranee ^a   Prabpai, Samran ^b   Kongsaeree, Palangpon ^b   Thongpanchang, Chawanee ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY   (Thailand)

^b Mahidol University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bioactive secondary metabolites; Dihydronaphthalenones; Endophytic fungi; Fusarium sp

Indexed keywords

3 O METHYLFUSARUBIN; 4 HYDROXYDIHYDRONORJAVANICIN; 5 HYDROXYDIHYDROFUSARUBIN C; AMPHOTERICIN B; ANHYDROFUSARUBIN; BOSTRYCOIDIN; DIHYDRONAPHTHALENONE DERIVATIVE; DOXORUBICIN; ELLIPTICINE; FUNGAL EXTRACT; ISONIAZID; JAVANICIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DRUG ISOLATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ENDOPHYTE; FUSARIUM; IC 50; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

FUNGI; FUSARIUM; FUSARIUM SP.;

EID: 80052021231     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: 14645416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.07.078     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. McLean Mycopathologia 133 1996 163 179
2. A.G. Medentsev, and V.K. Akimenko Phytochemistry 47 1998 935 959
3. U. Thrane, A. Adler, P. Clasen, F. Galvano, W. Langseth, H. Lew, A. Logrieco, K.F. Nielsen, and A. Ritieni Int. J. Food Microbiol. 95 2004 257 266
4. H.R.V. Arnstein, and A.H. Cook J. Chem. Soc. 1947 1021 1028
5. R.A. Baker, J.H. Tatum, and S.J. Nemee Mycopathologia 111 1990 9 15
6. A.W. McCulloch, A.G. McInnes, and D.G. Smith Can. J. Chem. 60 1982 2943 2949
7. J.H. Tatum, R.A. Baker, and R.E. Berry Phytochemistry 26 1987 2499 2500
8. N. Claydon, J.F. Grove, and M. Pople J. Invertebr. Pathol. 30 1977 216 223
9. I. Kurobane, N. Zaita, and A. Fukuda J. Antibiot. 39 1986 205 214
10. Itsuo, K.; Shunji, S.; Akihiko, M.; Akio, F. EP 0234431 A2, 1987.
11. G.P. Arsenault Tetrahedron Lett. 45 1965 4033 4037
12. H.W. Ruelius, and A. Gauhe Ann. Chem. 569 1950 38 59
13. Intrinsically, the crystal of compound 14 did not diffract well at ambient temperature and the crystal structure could not be obtained. Diffraction quality was improved by data collection at 150 K and structure determination was then possible. Extensive re-crystallization efforts failed to yield better quality diffraction data. From the "checkcif" results, analysis of crystal packing was carried out. There was a void space in the crystal and that might contribute to the poor crystal packing and hence the relatively high wR2 value. It should be noted that no solvent molecules were observed in the void cavity. The relatively poor refinement numbers are due to the intrinsic diffraction quality of the crystal. However, determination of the crystal structures is satisfactory.
14. S. Sungsuwan, N. Ruangsupapichart, S. Prabpai, P. Kongsaeree, and T. Thongpanchang Tetrahedron Lett. 51 2010 4965 4967
15. 16 was also applied with compound 4 and gave the same result.
16. J.A. Dale, and H.S. Mosher J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 1973 512 519
17. A. Altomare, M.C. Burla, M. Camalli, G.L. Cascarano, C. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, A.G.G. Moliterni, G. Polidori, and R. Spagna J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32 1999 115 119
18. G.M. Sheldrick Acta Crystallogr. A64 2008 112 122
19. C. Changsen, S.G. Franzblau, and P. Palittapongarnpim Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47 2003 3682 3687
20. J. O'Brien, I. Wilson, T. Orton, and F. Pongnan Eur. J. Biochem. 267 2000 5421 5426