Specification issues in assessing the moderating role of issue importance: A comment on Grynaviski and Corrigan (2006)

Political Analysis

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 342-350

  Malhotra, Neil ^a   Tahk, Alexander ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051959137     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr015     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aiken, Lenora S., and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
2. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14:63-82.
3. Carter, Michael. 2001. Foundations of mathematical economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
5. Griepentrog, Gary L., J. Michael Ryan, and L. Douglas Smith. 1982. Linear transformations of polynomial regression models. The American Statistician 36:171-4.
6. Grynaviski, Jeffrey D., and Bryce E. Corrigan. 2006. Specification issues in proximity models of candidate evaluation (with issue importance). Political Analysis 14:393-420.
7. Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review 103:59-81.
8. Kalandrakis, Tasos. 2010. Rationalizable voting. Theoretical Economics 5:93-125.
9. MacDonald, Stuart Elaine, George Rabinowitz, and Ola Listhaug. 2001. Sophistry versus science: On further efforts to rehabilitate the proximity model. Journal of Politics 63:482-500.
10. Merrill, Samuel. 1995. Discriminating between the directional and proximity spatial models of electoral competition. Electoral Studies 14(3):273-87.
11. Merrill, Samuel, and Bernard Grofman. 1999. A unified theory of voting: Directional and proximity spatial models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83:93-121.
13. Tomz, Michael, and Robert P. Van Houweling. 2008. Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review 102:303-18.
14. Westholm, Anders. 2001. On the return of epicycles: Some crossroads in spatial modeling revisited. Journal of Politics 63:436-81.