Rationalizable voting

Theoretical Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 93-125

  Kalandrakis, Tasos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Ideal points; Revealed preferences; Testable restrictions; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955236998     PISSN: 19336837     EISSN: 15557561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3982/TE425     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Afriat Sydney. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International Economic Review 1967, 8:67-77.
2. Arrow Kenneth J. Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica 1959, 26:121-127.
3. Bogomolnaia Anna, Laslier Jean-Franthomam. Euclidean preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2007, 43:87-98.
4. Chambers Christopher P, Echenique Federico. Supermodularity and preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 2009, 144:1004-1014.
5. Chavas Jean-Paul, Cox Thomas. On generalized revealed preference analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1993, 108:493-506.
6. Clinton Joshua, Jackman Simon, Rivers Douglas. The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review 2004, 98:355-370.
7. Clinton Joshua D, Meirowitz Adam. Agenda constrained legislator ideal points and the spatial voting model. Political Analysis 2001, 9:242-259.
8. Cox James C, Friedman Daniel, Sadiraj Vjollca. Revealed altruism. Econometrica 2008, 76:31-69.
9. de Finetti Bruno. Sulle stratificazioni convesse. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 1949, 30:173-183.
10. Degan Arianna, Merlo Antonio. Do voters vote ideologically? Journal of Economic Theory 2009, 144:1868-1894.
11. Farquharson Robin. Theory of Voting 1969, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut
12. Forges Franthomampersa, Minelli Enrico. Afriat's theorem for general budget sets. Journal of Economic Theory 2009, 144:135-145.
13. Heckman James J, Snyder James M. Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND Journal of Economics 1997, 28:S142-S189.
14. Kalandrakis Tasos. Roll call data and ideal points. 2006, Working Paper 42, Wallis Institute of Political Economy, University of Rochester
15. Kannai Yakar. Concavifiability and constructions of concave utility functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1977, 4:1-56.
16. Kannai Yakar. Remarks concerning concave utility functions on finite sets. Economic Theory 2005, 26:333-344.
17. Londregan John. Estimating legislators' preferred points. Political Analysis 1999, 8:35-56.
18. Matzkin Rosa L. Axioms of revealed preference for nonlinear choice sets. Econometrica 1991, 59:1779-1786.
19. Matzkin Rosa L, Richter Marcel K. Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory 1991, 53:287-303.
20. Poole Keith T, Rosenthal Howard. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 1985, 29:357-384.
21. Poole Keith T, Rosenthal Howard. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting 1997, Oxford University Press, New York
22. Richter Marcel K. Revealed preference theory. Econometrica 1966, 34:635-645.
23. Richter Marcel K, Wong Kam-Chau. Concave utility on finite sets. Journal of Economic Theory 2004, 115:341-357.
24. Schwartz Thomas. One dimensionality and stability in legislative voting: Where is the evidence? 2007, Unpubished paper, Department of Political Science, University of California Los Angeles
25. Szpilrajn Edward. Sur l'extension de l'ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae 1930, 16:386-389.
26. Varian Hal R. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 1982, 50:945-973.