To tell the truth: On scientific counterpublics

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 627-641

  Hess, David J ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

counterpublic; deliberative; expertise; public

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051954849     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662509359988     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Albert M.Universities and the Market Economy: The Differential Impact on Knowledge Production in Sociology and Economics.Higher Education.2003;45:147-82.
2. Amsterdamska O.Medical and Biological Constraints: Early Research on Bacteriology.Social Studies of Science.1987;17 (4): 657-87.
3. Amsterdamska O.Stabilizing Instability: The Controversy over Cyclogenic Theories of Bacterial Variation during the Interwar Period.Journal of the History of Biology.1991;24 (2): 191-222.
4. Counterpublics and the State.Asen R.Brouwer D., ed.Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2001:.
5. Babb S.Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism.Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
6. Bourdieu P.The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1981:.
7. Bourdieu P.Sociology in Question.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1993:.
8. Bourdieu P.Pascalian Meditations.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1997:.
9. Bourdieu P.Science of Science and Reflexivity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001:.
10. Cobb S.,Weinberg D.The Importance of Import Substitution in Regional Economic Impact Analysis: Empirical Estimates from Two Cincinnati Area Events.Economic Development Quarterly.1993;7 (3): 282-6.
11. Collins H.Rethinking Expertise.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007:.
12. Dietrich H.,Schibeci R.Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: Community Participation in Public Policy in Australia.Public Understanding of Science.2003;12 (4): 381-401.
13. Durant D.Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public Actor.Public Understanding of Science.2008;17 (1): 5-20.
14. Fraser N.Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition.New York: Routledge; 1997:.
15. Frickel S.,Moore K.The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 2005:.
16. Habermas J.The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989:.
17. Habermas J.Habermas and the Public Sphere.Calhoun C., ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992:421-61.
18. Harding S.Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1998:.
19. Hess D.Can Bacteria Cause Cancer? Alternative Medicine Confronts Big Science.New York: New York University Press; 1997:.
20. Hess D.Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in the United States.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:.
21. Hess D.Localist Movements in a Global Economy: Sustainability, Justice, and Urban Development in the United States.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009a:.
22. Hess D.The Potentials and Limitations of Civil Society Research: Getting Undone Science Done.Sociological Inquiry.2009b;79 (3): 306-27.
23. Hess D.Environmental Reform Organizations and Undone Science in the United States: Exploring the Environmental, Health, and Safety Implications of Nanotechnology.Science as Culture.2010;:.
24. Irwin A.Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences.Public Understanding of Science.2001;10 (1): 1-18.
25. Jacobs J.The Economy of Cities.New York: Vintage Books; 1969:.
26. Jacobs J.Cities and the Wealth of Nations.New York: Random House; 1984:.
27. Katz E.,Solomon F.,Mee W.,Lovel R.Evolving Scientific Research Governance in Australia: A Case Study of Engaging Interested Publics in Nanotechnology Research.Public Understanding of Science.2009;18 (5): 531-45.
28. Kinchy A.,Kleinman D.,Autry R.Against Free Markets, Against Science? Regulating the Socio-economic Effects of Biotechnology.Rural Sociology.2008;73 (2): 147-80.
29. Kleinman D.,Kinchy A.Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscapes in Europe and the United States.Science as Culture.2003;12 (3): 375-414.
30. Kleinman D.,Kinchy A.Against the Neoliberal Steamroller? The Biosafety Protocol and the Social Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology.Agriculture and Human Values.2007;24 (2): 195-206.
31. Kossey J.Economic Restructuring and the Restructuring of Economic Development Practice: A New York Perspective, 1985-1995.Economic Development Quarterly.1996;10 (4): 300-14.
32. Lezaun J.,Soneryd L.Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.Public Understanding of Science.2007;16 (3): 279-97.
33. MitchellS.(2009) "The Corporate Co-op of Local," East Bay Express8July.URL (consulted 5 November 2009): www.eastbayexpress.com.
34. Monmaney T.Marshall's Hunch.The New Yorker.1993;:64ff.
35. Moore K.Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Political of the Military, 1945-1975.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008:.
36. Morris D.Self-Reliant Cities: Energy and the Transformation of Urban America.San Francisco: Sierra Club; 1982:.
37. Moss R.The Cancer Industry.New York: Paragon; 1989:.
38. Persky J.,Ranney D.,Wiewel W.Import Substitution and Local Economic Development.Economic Development Quarterly.1993;7 (1): 18-29.
39. Polanyi K.The Great Transformation.New York: Rinehart; 1994:.
40. Portes A.,Roberts B.The Free-Market City: Latin American Urbanization in the Years of the Neoliberal Experiment.Studies in Comparative International Development.2005;40 (1): 43-82.
41. Powell M.,Kleinman D.Building Citizen Capacities for Participation in Nanotechnology Decision-Making: The Democratic Virtues of the Consensus Conference Model.Public Understanding of Science.2008;17 (3): 329-48.
42. Power T.Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place.Washington, DC: Island Press; 1996:.
43. Scott P.,Richards E.,Martin B.Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies.Science, Technology, and Human Values.1990;15 (4): 474-94.
44. Shuman M.The Small-Mart Revolution: How Local Businesses are Beating the Global Competition.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2006:.
45. Stiglitz J.Globalization and its Discontents.New York: W.W.Norton; 2002:.
46. Warner M.Publics and Counterpublics.New York: Zone Books; 2002:.
47. Wuerthele-Caspe Livingston V.Cancer: A New Breakthrough.Los Angeles: Nash Publishing; 1972:.
48. Wynne B.Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science.Public Understanding of Science.1992;1 (3): 281-304.
49. Wynne B.Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement.Leach M.Scoones I.Wynne B., ed.London: Zed; 2005:66-82.
50. Wynne B.Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music.Community Genetics.2007a;9 (3): 211-20.
51. Wynne B.Genetically Engineered Crops: Interim Policies, Uncertain Legislation.Taylor I., ed.New York: Haworth Food and Agricultural Products Press; 2007b:341-72.
52. Wynne B.Elephants in the Rooms where Publics Encounter 'Science'? A Response to Darrin Durant, 'Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public,'.Public Understanding of Science.2008;17 (1): 21-33.
53. Yearley S.Making Systematic Sense of Public Discontents with Expert Knowledge: Two Analytical Approaches and a Case Study.Public Understanding of Science.2000;9 (2): 105-22.