Stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer does the new staging criteria predict survival?

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 711-716

  Garg, Gunjal ^a   Shah, Jay P ^b   Toy, Eugene P ^c   Christensen, Carl ^d   Deppe, Gunter ^e   Asaad, Radwan ^a   Morris, Robert T ^b  

^a DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical Cancer; Stage IIA; Staging Criteria; Survival; Tumor Size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEER PROGRAM; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051903651     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182138648     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chung CK, Nahhas WA, Stryker JA, et al. Analysis of factors contributing to treatment failures in stages IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:550-556. (Pubitemid 11250683)
2. Alvarez RD, Soong SJ, Kinney WK, et al. Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;35:130-135. (Pubitemid 19268543)
3. Alvarez RD, Gelder MS, Gore H, et al. Radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with bulky early stage carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;176:539-542. (Pubitemid 23155742)
4. Kristensen GB, Abeler VM, Risberg B, et al. Tumor size, depth of invasion, and grading of the invasive tumor front are the main prognostic factors in early squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:245-251. (Pubitemid 29377220)
5. Trattner M, Graf AH, Lax S, et al. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:11-16. (Pubitemid 32634947)
6. Eifel PJ, Jhingran A, Levenback CF, et al. Predictive value of a proposed subclassification of stages I and II cervical cancer based on clinical tumor diameter. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:2-7.
7. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:107-108.
8. Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 17 Regs Limited-Use + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2008 Sub (1973-2006 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2006 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2009, based on the November 2008 submission.
9. Available at: www.census.gov/geo/www/us-regdiv.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2010.
10. Horn LC, Fischer U, Raptis G, et al. Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO stage II cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:310-315. (Pubitemid 47575730)
11. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IbYIIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350:535-540. (Pubitemid 27348428)
12. Turan T, Yildirim BA, Tulunay G, et al. Prognostic effect of different cut-off values (20 mm, 30 mm and 40 mm) for clinical tumor size in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer. Surg Oncol. 2010;19:106-113.
13. Finan MA, DeCesare S, Fiorica JV, et al. Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival? Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62:139-147. (Pubitemid 26274790)
14. Rutledge TL, Kamelle SA, Tillmanns TD, et al. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference? Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:70-76. (Pubitemid 39286279)
15. Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Shaw RE, et al. Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:e1-e9.
16. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy according to tumor size divided by 2-cm interval in patients with early cervical cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:59-67.
17. Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38:352-357. (Pubitemid 20362555)
18. Barter JF, Soong SJ, Shingleton HM, et al. Complications of combined radical hysterectomy-postoperative radiation therapy in women with early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;32:292-296. (Pubitemid 19074916)
19. Fiorica JV, Roberts WS, Greenberg H, et al. Morbidity and survival patterns in patients after radical hysterectomy and postoperative adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;36:343-347. (Pubitemid 20116906)
20. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM, et al. Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. Cancer. 1992;69:2796-2806.
21. Eifel PJ, Morris M, Wharton JT, et al. The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29:9-16. (Pubitemid 24138859)
22. Ho CM, Chien TY, Huang SH, et al. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:458-464.
23. Comerci G, Bolger BS, Flannelly G, et al. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage IBYIIB carcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998;8:23-26. (Pubitemid 28119953)
24. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1606-1613. (Pubitemid 30220538)
25. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1137-1143. (Pubitemid 29177872)
26. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:177-183. (Pubitemid 29215728)