Testing the Technology Acceptance Model: HIV case managers' intention to use a continuity of care record with context-specific links

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 161-172

  Schnall, Rebecca ^a   Bakken, Suzanne ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

case management; continuity of care record (CCR); Technology Acceptance Model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CASE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CASE MANAGEMENT; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051870536     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2011.584998     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ford EW, Menachemi N, Phillips MT. Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:106-112. (Pubitemid 41828341)
2. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland C, Hapgood R, Horsfield P, Teasdale S, Johnson C. The electronic patient record in primary care-regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ 2003;326:1439-1443. (Pubitemid 36776156)
3. Tange HJ, Hasman A, de Vries Robbé PF, Schouten HC. Medical narratives in electronic medical records. International Jounrnal of Medical Informatics 1997;46:7-29. (Pubitemid 27374483)
4. Bjorvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2002;16:34-42. (Pubitemid 34225285)
5. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses? perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Computers Informatics Nursing 2004;22:337-344. (Pubitemid 39626983)
6. Cooper JD. Organization, management, implementation and value of ehr implementation in a solo pediatric practice. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2004;18:51-55.
7. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press;2001.
8. Johnson TR, Tang X, Graham MJ, Brixey J, Turley JP, Zhang J, Keselman A, Patel VL. Attitudes toward medical device use errors and the prevention of adverse events. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2007;33:689-694.
9. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 1991;2:173-191.
10. Norman DA. User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1986.
11. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:318-340.
12. Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1993;38:475-487.
13. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 1992;16:227-247.
14. Hendrickson AR, Massey PD, Gronan TP. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly 1993;17:227-230.
15. Segars AH, Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly 2001;17:517-525.
16. Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of he technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46:186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
17. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, Tam KY. Examining the Technology Acceptance Model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;16:91-112. (Pubitemid 32716799)
18. Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Modeling patients? acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11:241-248. (Pubitemid 38887143)
19. Handy J, Hunter I, Whiddett R. User acceptance of inter-organizational electronic medical records. Health Informatics Journal 2001;7:103-107. (Pubitemid 33333331)
20. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians. Medical Care Research and Review 2007;64:650-672.
21. Melas CD, Zampetakis LA, Dimopoulou A, Moustakis V. Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: an extended TAM model. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. in press.
22. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010;43:159-172.
23. Schnall R, Gordon P, Camhi E, Bakken S. Perceptions of factors influencing use of an electronic continuity of care record for case management of persons living with HIV. AIDS Care 2011;23:357-365.
24. Schnall R, et al. Information needs of case managers caring for persons living with HIV. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18:305-308.
25. Health Level Seven Inc [Internet]. Clinical document architecture. 2007-2009.Available from: www.hl7.org/implement/standards/cda.cfm(accessed 3 December 2009).
26. ASTM International [Internet]. ASTM E31.28 E-. Standard specification for Continuity of Care Record (CCR). 2005.Available from: www.astm.org/COMMIT/E31- ConceptPaper.doc (accessed 14 December 2009).
27. Schnall R, Odlum M, Gordon P, Bakken S. Barriers to implementation of a Continuity of Care Record (CCR) in HIV/AIDS care. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2009;146:248-252.
28. Park EJ. A comparison of knowledge and activities in case management practice. Doctoral Dissertation. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 2006.
29. Park EJ, Huber DL. Case management workforce in the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2009;41:175-183.
30. Merrill EB. et al. HIV/AIDS case management: a learning experience for undergraduate nursing students. The ABNF Journal 1996;7:47-53.
31. Abramowitz S, Obten N, Cohen H. Measuring case management for families with HIV. Social Work in Health Care 1998;27:29-41. (Pubitemid 28299748)
32. Shelton RC, Golin CE, Smith SR, Eng E, Kaplan A. Role of the HIV/AIDS case manager: analysis of a case management adherence training and coordination program in North Carolina. AIDS Patient Care and STDS 2006;20:193-204.
33. NY State Department of Health [Internet]. AIDS Institue Health Care Services. 2007. Available from: http://www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/aids/ about/hlthcare.htm#dacs. (accessed7 May 2009).
34. Dillon TW, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems. Computers in Nursing 1998;16:151-156. (Pubitemid 128731967)
35. Hyun S, Currie LM, Hodorowski JK, Joyce MP, Lee NJ, Velez O, Bakken S. Nurses? use and perceptions of usefulness of National Cancer Institute?s tobacco-related Cancer Information Service (CIS) resources. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2008:985.
36. Knapp TR, Brown JK. Ten measurement commandments that often should be broken. Research in Nursing and Health 1995;18:465-469.
37. Hutcheson G, Sofroniou N. The multivariate social scientist: introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
38. Waltz C, Strickland O, Lenz E. Measurement in nursing and health research. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2004.
39. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
40. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, and Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:425-478.
41. Moss S, et al. Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1998;42:173-183. (Pubitemid 28349674)
42. Cimino JJ, Friedmann BE, Jackson KM, Li J, Pevzner J, Wrenn J. Redesign of the Columbia University Infobutton Manager. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2007:135-139.
43. Maviglia SM, Yoon CS, Bates DW, Kuperman G. KnowledgeLink: impact of context-sensitive information retrieval on clinicians? information needs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:67-73. (Pubitemid 41828337)
44. Taylor S, Todd P. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 1995;19:561-570.
45. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstädter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10:69-84. (Pubitemid 36134063)
46. Chang P, Tzeng YM,Wu SC, Sang YY, Chen SS. Development and comparison of user acceptance of advanced comprehensive triage PDA support system with a traditional terminal alternative system. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2003:140-144.
47. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989;35:982-1003.
48. Hulse NC, Fiol GD, Rocha RA. Modeling end-users? acceptance of a knowledge authoring tool. Methods of Information in Medicine 2006;45:528-535. (Pubitemid 44608167)
49. Mazzoleni MC, Baiardi P, Giorgi I, Franchi G, Marconi R, Cortesi M. Assessing users? satisfaction through perception of usefulness and ease of use in the daily interaction with a hospital information system. Proceedings of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1996:752-756.
50. Pare G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians? acceptance of clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:197-205. (Pubitemid 43332911)
51. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Jkhul JB, editor. Action control: from cognition to behavior. New York, NY: SpringerVerlag; 1985.
52. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991;50:179-211.
53. Moore GC. End user computing and office automation: a diffusion of innovations perspective. INFOR 1987;25:214-235.
54. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995;6:144-176. (Pubitemid 126102974)
55. Barker DJ, et al. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2003;28:85-97. (Pubitemid 37168507)
56. MazzoleniMC, Baiardi P, Giorgi I, Franchi G, Marconi R, Cortesi M. Spreading the clinical information system: which users are satisfied? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 1997;43:162-166. (Pubitemid 128145331)
57. Tahan HA, Campagna V. Case management roles and functions across various settings and professional disciplines. Professional Case Management 2010;15:245-277.