Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination

Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 85-97

  Barker, D J ^a   Van Schaik, P ^a   Simpson, D S ^a   Corbett, W A ^b  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endoscopy; Evaluation; Spoken Dialogue system; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MICROCOMPUTER; MICROPHONE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECORDING; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CLINICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOICE;

EID: 0141494513     PISSN: 14639238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639230310001600452     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Davis, F. D. and Venkatesh, V., 1996, A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19-45.
2. Davis, F. D., 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September, 318-340.
3. Grasso, M. A., Ebert, D. and Finin, T., 1997, Acceptance of a speech interface for biomedical data collection. Proceedings AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, 739-743.
4. Barker, D. J., Lynch, S. C., Simpson, D.S. and Corbett, W. A., 1999, Speech driven natural language understanding for hands-busy recording of clinical information. Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Medical Decision Making. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 411-415.
5. Dowding, J., Gawron, J. M., Appelt, D., Cherny, L., Moore, R. and Moran, D., 1993, Gemini: a natural language system for spoken language understanding. Proceedings ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, 43-48.
6. Yankelovich, N. and Baatz, E., 1994, SpeechActs: a framework for building speech applications. AVIOS 94 Conference Proceedings. San Jose, CA. September 20-23, 1994.
7. Aust, H. and Oerder, M., 1995, Dialogue control in automatic inquiry systems. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, edited by P. Dalsgaard, L. Larsen, L. Boves and I. Thomson (eds). pp. 121-124.
8. Berwick, D., 1996, A primer leading to the improvement of a system. British Medical Journal, 312, 619-622.
9. Giachin, E., 1996, Spoken language dialogue. In Cole, RA. Mariani, J. Uszkoreit, H. Zaenen, A. Zue, V. (eds). Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology. cslu.cse.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey. 241-245.
10. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F., 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
11. van Schaik, P., Bettany-Saltikov, J. A. and Warren, J. G., 2002, Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 47-57.
12. Conner, M. and Sparks, P., 1996, The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours. In Predicting Health Behaviour, edited by M. Conner and P. Norman (Open University Press: Buckingham) pp. 121-162.
13. Venkatesh, V., 2000, Determinants of perceived ease of use, integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.