Correlation of seismic intensity with Fourier acceleration spectra

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 523-528

  Chernov, Yu K ^a   Sokolov, V Yu ^b  

^a SK IGC   (Russian Federation)

^b NCREE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 0032864387     PISSN: 14641895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1464-1895(99)00065-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ambraseys, N. N. Dynamics and response of foundation materials in epicentral regions of strong earthquakes, Proc. 5th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Rome, v. 1, pp. CXXVI-CXLVIII, 1973.
2. Aptikaev, F. F. and Shebalin, N. V. The correlation between macroseismic effects and dynamic parameters of ground motion, Investigations of Seismic Hazard (Problems of Engineering Seismology, 29), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 98-108, 1988 (in Russian).
3. Barosh, P. J. Use of seismic intensity data to predict the effects of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions in various geological settings, US Geol. Survey Bull., 1279, 1969
4. Boore, D. M. Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions, based on seismological model of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 1865-1894, 1983.
5. Boore, D. M. and Joyner, W. B. Site amplifications for generic rock sites, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 327-341, 1997.
6. Chernov, Yu. K. and Sokolov V. Yu. Some relations between ground motion parameters and felt intensity of the earthquakes, Problems of Engineering Seismology, 24, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 96-111, 1983 (in Russian)
7. Chernov, Yu. K. Strong Ground Motion and Quantitative Estimation of Seismic Hazard, Fan Publishing House, Tashkent, 1989 (in Russian)
8. Hanks, C. and Brady, A. G. The Loma Prieta earthquake, ground motion and damage in Oakland, Treasure Island, and San Francisco, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 2019-2047, 1991.
9. Gupta, I. M. A note of correlation of modified mercalli intensity with peaks of far-field ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 925-932, 1980.
10. Krinitzsky, E. L. and Marcuson, W. F. Principles for selecting earthquake motions in engineering design, Bull. Ass. of Eng. Geol., XX, 253-265, 1983.
11. Murphy, J. R. and O'Brien, J. L. The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 877-915, 1977.
12. Nazarov, A. G. and Shebalin, N. V. (Editors). Seismic Scale and the Methods of Seismic Intensity Measuring. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 1975 (in Russian).
13. Ohta, Y, Ohashi, H., Ergünay, O., and Tabban, A. Seismic intensity and its application to engineering: A study in Turkey, Strong Ground Motion Seismology, M. Erdic and M.N. Toksöz, Editors, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 385-401, 1987.
14. Rymer, M. J. and Ellsworth, W. L., (editors). The Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983, U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Paper, 1487, Washigton, 1990.
15. Stover, V. W. Intensity distribution and isoseimal map, Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983: Reconnaissance report. Scholl, R.E. and Stratta, J.L. (Editors). ERRI Report 84-03, 182-188, 1983.
16. Trifunac, M. D. and Brady, A. G. On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65, 139-162, 1975.
17. Trifunac, M. D. Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of modified mercally intensity and recording site conditions, Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, 7, 63-74, 1976.
18. Trifunac, M. D. Scaling strong motion Fourier spectra by modified mercalli intensity, local soil and local geological site conditions, Structural Eng./Earthquake Eng., 6, 387-394, 1989.