Correlation of frequency-doubling perimetry with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 366-370

  Kaushik, Sushmita ^a   Pandav, Surinder Singh ^a   Ichhpujani, Parul ^a   Gupta, Amod ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

frequency doubling perimetry; glaucoma suspect; ocular hypertensive; optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE FIBER; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC DISC SIZE; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; VISUAL FIELD;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 80051798780     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181eda96e     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III: quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146. (Pubitemid 12203071)
2. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
3. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748. (Pubitemid 30158884)
4. Johnson CA. Selective versus non-selective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994;3:32-44.
5. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:213-225. (Pubitemid 36666041)
6. Johnson CA. Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:77-84. (Pubitemid 34261265)
7. Maddess T, Henry G. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
8. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
9. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:398-401. (Pubitemid 34113221)
10. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, et al. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599. (Pubitemid 35334369)
11. Zeppieri M, Demirel S, Kent K, et al. Perceived spatial frequency of sinusoidal gratings. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:318-329. (Pubitemid 351643369)
12. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, et al. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:188-197. (Pubitemid 32157032)
13. Trible JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC, et al. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:740-745. (Pubitemid 30604152)
14. STRATUS OCT User Manual. Jena, Germany: Carl Zeiss Meditech; 2004:39.
15. Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, et al. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am Ophthalmol. 2005;139:39-43. (Pubitemid 40094838)
16. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44-55. (Pubitemid 40094839)
17. Fukushima A, Shirakashi M, Yaoeda K, et al. Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:114-119. (Pubitemid 38372821)
18. Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field by non-conventional perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:35-39. (Pubitemid 36020421)
19. Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, et al. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? J Glaucoma. 2007;16:372-383. (Pubitemid 46945534)
20. Landers JA, Goldberg I, Graham SL. Comparison of optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;30:338-342. (Pubitemid 35203371)
21. Soliman MA, de Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, et al. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:444-454. (Pubitemid 34184910)
22. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829. (Pubitemid 28283743)
23. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al; The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714-720; discussion 829-830.
24. Kim SH, Hong H, Koo HJ, et al. Correlation between frequency doubling technology perimetry and scanning laser polarimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucomatous eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2004;18:89-99.
25. Kim TW, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1053-1057. (Pubitemid 46829366)
26. Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, et al. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:165-171.
27. Horn FK, Nguyen NX, Mardin CY, et al. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:160-168. (Pubitemid 36151792)
28. Brusini P, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, et al. Stratus-OCT imaging in early glaucomatous and in ocular hypertensive patients with and without frequency-doubling technology abnormalities. Eye. 2008;22:406-413. (Pubitemid 351404467)
29. Cellini M, Bernabini B, Carbonelli M, et al. Optical coherence tomography, frequency-doubling technology, and colour Doppler imaging in ocular hypertension. Eye. 2007;21:1071-1077. (Pubitemid 47263756)
30. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreib RN. Frequency doubling technology abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:863-871. (Pubitemid 38582039)
31. Heeg GP, Jansonius NM. The Groningen longitudinal glaucoma study III. The predictive value of frequencydoubling perimetry and GDx nerve fiber analyzer test results for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Eye. 2009;23:1647-1652.
32. Kamantigue ME, Joson PJ, Chen PP. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:35-39. (Pubitemid 43068418)
33. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1009-1017. (Pubitemid 34465239)