Relationship between Indices of Humphrey Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in Glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 114-119

  Fukushima, Atsushi ^a   Shirakashi, Motohiro ^a   Yaoeda, Kiyoshi ^a   Funaki, Shigeo ^a   Funaki, Haruko ^a   Ofuchi, Nobutaka ^a   Abe, Haruki ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling technology perimetry; Glaucoma; Humphrey perimetry; Mean deviation; Pattern standard deviation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; HUMAN; HUMPHREY PERIMETRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 1642284497     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200404000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III: quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
2. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
3. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
4. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR, et al. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:913-920.
5. Chaturvedi N, Hedley-White ET, Dreyer EB. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:182-188.
6. Dandona L, Hendrickson A, Quigley HA. Selective effects of experimental glaucoma on axonal transport by retinal ganglion cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:1593-1599.
7. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-363.
8. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
9. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, et al. Clinical trials of the frequency doubling illusion as an indicator of glaucoma [ARVO abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:335.
10. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
11. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994;3:S32-S44.
12. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
13. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal grating. J Opt Soc Am. 1981;71:1051-1055.
14. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, et al. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
15. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, et al. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:830-836.
16. Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, et al. Automated perimetry: a report by American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:2362-2374.
17. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
18. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1783-1790.
19. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1993-2003.
20. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, et al. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:188-197.
21. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314-322.
22. Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Correlation with Octopus perimeter indices. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:288-294.
23. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:648-656.
24. Horikoshi N, Osako M, Tamura Y, et al. Comparison of detectability of visual field abnormality by frequency doubling technology in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45:503-509.
25. Serguhn S, Spiegel D. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:351-355.
26. Heijl A. Humphrey field analyzer. In: Drance SM, Anderson DR, eds. Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. A Practical Guide. Orlando: Grune and Stratton; 1985: 129-140.
27. Tyrrell RA, Owens DA. A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena. The modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1988;20:137-141.
28. Johnson CA, Shapiro LR. A comparison of MOBS (modified binary search) and staircase test procedures in automated perimetry. In: Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System Technical Digest Series. Washington: Optical Society of America Press; 1989: 84-87.