Visuomotor adaptation does not recalibrate kinesthetic sense of felt hand path

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 614-623

  Wong, Teser ^a   Henriques, Denise Y P ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT; KINESTHESIA; MUSCLE INNERVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSOR; SKIN NERVE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 61349195184     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90544.2008     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol 88: 973-981, 2002.
2. Bernier PM, Chua R, Bard C, Franks IM. Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study. Neuroreport 17: 1421-1425, 2006.
3. Bernier PM, Chua R, Franks IM. Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Exp Brain Res 167: 292-296, 2005.
4. Bernier PM, Chua R, Inglis JT, Franks IM. Sensorimotor adaptation in response to proprioceptive bias. Exp Brain Res 177: 147-156, 2007.
5. Bock O, Abeele S, Eversheim U. Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process. Exp Brain Res 152: 528-532, 2003.
6. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL. Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophysiol 90: 3105-3118, 2003.
7. Cothros N, Wong JD, Gribble PL. Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? Exp Brain Res 173: 689-697, 2006.
8. Cressman EK, Henriques DY. The Influence of visual-proprioceptive integration on sense of limb position. Can Assoc Neurosci Abstr B-D2147, 2008.
9. Cunningham HA. Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15: 493-506, 1989.
10. Desmurget M, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C, Stelmach GE, Jeannerod M. Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73: 262-272, 1995.
11. Fasse ED, Hogan N, Kay BA, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Haptic interaction with virtual objects. Spatial perception and motor control. Biol Cybern 82: 69-83, 2000.
12. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
13. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci 16: 7085-7096, 1996.
14. Gordon IE, Morison V. The haptic perception of curvature. Percept Psychophys 31: 446-450, 1982.
15. Henriques DY, Soechting JF. Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Exp Brain Res 150: 95-108, 2003.
16. Ingram HA, van Donkelaar P, Cole J, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM, Miall RC. The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Exp Brain Res 132: 114-126, 2000.
17. Jacobs RA. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 39: 3621-3629, 1999.
18. Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE. Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115: 557-561, 1997.
19. Kesten H. Accelerated stochastic approximation. Ann Math Statist 29: 41-59, 1958.
20. Klassen J, Tong C, Flanagan JR. Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164: 250-259, 2005.
21. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 25: 473-478, 2005.
22. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
23. Malfait N, Henriques DY, Gribble PL. Shape distortion produced by isolated mismatch between vision and proprioception. J Neurophysiol 99: 231-243, 2008.
24. Miall RC, Cole J. Evidence for stronger visuo-motor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects. Exp Brain Res 176: 432-439, 2007.
25. Miall RC, Haggard PN. The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experience. Exp Brain Res 103: 421-428, 1995.
26. Miall RC, Jenkinson N, Kulkarni K. Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Exp Brain Res 154: 201-210, 2004.
27. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP, Jenkinson M, Rushton K. Synaesthesia in the normal limb. Proc Biol Sci 264: 1007-1010, 1997.
28. Proteau L, Isabelle G. On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. J Mot Behav 34: 367-384, 2002.
29. Redding GM, Rossetti Y, Wallace B. Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29: 431-444, 2005.
30. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 379-394, 1996.
31. Rock I, Victor J. Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143: 594-596, 1964.
32. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C. Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J Neurophysiol 74: 457-463, 1995.
33. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145: 437-447, 2002.
34. Simani MC, McGuire LM, Sabes PN. Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects. J Neurophysiol 98: 2827-2841, 2007.
35. Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DD, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18781-18786, 2006.
36. Soechting JF, Song W, Flanders M. Haptic feature extraction. Cereb Cortex 16: 1168-1180, 2006.
37. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 35: 2503-2522, 1995.
38. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111: 253-261, 1996.
39. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999.
40. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002.
41. Vetter P, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map. J Neurophysiol 81: 935-939, 1999.
42. Voisin J, Benoit G, Chapman CE. Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: two-dimensional angle discrimination. Exp Brain Res 145: 239-250, 2002a.
43. Voisin J, Lamarre Y, Chapman CE. Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs. Exp Brain Res 145: 251-260, 2002b.
44. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995.
45. Yamamoto K, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Rapid and long-lasting plasticity of input-output mapping. J Neurophysiol 96: 2797-2801, 2006.