Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: Analysis of observed changes

Neurosurgery

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Thirumala, Parthasarathy D ^a   Kassasm, Amin B ^b   Habeych, Miguel ^a   Wichman, Kelley ^a   Chang, Yue Fang ^a   Gardner, Paul ^a   Prevedello, Daniel ^c   Snyderman, Carl ^a   Carrau, Ricardo ^c   Crammond, Donald J ^a   Balzer, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHN WAYNE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoscopic endonasal surgery; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; ENDONASAL APPROACH; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKULL BASE; SKULL SURGERY;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEUROENDOSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKULL BASE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 80051785220     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821606e4     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bejjani GK, Nora PC, Vera PL, Broemling L, Sekhar LN. The predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring: Review of 244 procedures. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(3):491-498. (Pubitemid 28400120)
2. Gentili F, Lougheed WM, Yamashiro K, Corrado C. Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during surgery of skull base tumours. Can J Neurol Sci. 1985;12(4):336-340.
3. De Vleeschauwer P, Horsch S, Matamoros R. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery: Results, usefulness and limitations of the method. Ann Vasc Surg. 1988;2(1):63-68.
4. Lopez JR, Chang SD, Steinberg GK. The use of electrophysiological monitoring in the intraoperative management of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(2):189-196. (Pubitemid 29103520)
5. Friedman WA, Kaplan BL, Day AL, Sypert GW, Curran MT. Evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm operation: Observations after fifty cases. Neurosurgery. 1987;20(5):678-687. (Pubitemid 17091432)
6. Mooij JJ, Buchthal A, Belopavlovic M. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion during aneurysm operation. Neurosurgery. 1987;21(4):492-496. (Pubitemid 17154028)
7. Schramm J, Zentner J, Pechstein U. Intraoperative SEP monitoring in aneurysm surgery. Neurol Res. 1994;16(1):20-22. (Pubitemid 24073073)
8. Penchet G, Arne P, Cuny E, Monteil P, Loiseau H, Castel JP. Use of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials to prevent ischaemic stroke after surgical exclusion of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(4):357-364. (Pubitemid 46582077)
9. McPherson RW, Niedermeyer EF, Otenasek RJ, Hanley DF. Correlation of transient neurological deficit and somatosensory evoked potentials after intracranial aneurysm surgery: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(1):146-149. (Pubitemid 13065721)
10. Symon L, Wang AD, Costa e Silva IE, Gentili F. Perioperative use of somatosensory evoked responses in aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg. 1984;60(2):269-275. (Pubitemid 14177702)
11. Markand ON, Dilley RS, Moorthy SS, Warren C Jr. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy. Arch Neurol. 1984;41(4):375-378. (Pubitemid 14167811)
12. Lam AM, Manninen PH, Ferguson GG, Nantau W. Monitoring electrophysiologic function during carotid endarterectomy: A comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and conventional electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 1991;75(1):15-21.
13. Guerit JM, Witdoeckt C, de Tourtchaninoff M, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery, I: Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(6):459-469. (Pubitemid 27519823)
14. Witdoeckt C, Ghariani S, Guerit JM. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery, II: Comparison between qualitative and quantitative scoring systems. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(4):328-332. (Pubitemid 27297764)
15. Moritz S, Kasprzak P, Arlt M, Taeger K, Metz C. Accuracy of cerebral monitoring in detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy: A comparison of transcranial Doppler sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, stump pressure, and somatosensory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(4):563-569. (Pubitemid 47480561)
16. Stejskal L, Kramar F, Ostry S, Benes V, Mohapl M, Limberk B. Experience of 500 cases of neurophysiological monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(7):681-688.
17. Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Hilibrand AS, et al. Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20(6):437-444.
18. Chung I, Glow JA, Dimopoulos V, et al. Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: A prognostic marker for position- related ulnar nerve injury. Spine J. 2009;9(4):287-295.
19. Kamel IR, Drum ET, Koch SA, et al. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between patient positioning and impending upper extremity nerve injury during spine surgery: A retrospective analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(5):1538-1542.
20. Schwartz DM, Drummond DS, Hahn M, Ecker ML, Dormans JP. Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(2):178-182.
21. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: A fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: Technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1)(suppl):E213.
22. Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: Fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E6.
23. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: The rostrocaudal axis, part I: Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E3.
24. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: The rostrocaudal axis, part II: Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E4.
25. Kassam A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Mintz A. Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E8.
26. Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, et al. Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: A case series. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(1):6-16. (Pubitemid 351930516)
27. Balzer JR, Rose RD, Welch WC, Sclabassi RJ. Simultaneous somatosensory evoked potential and electromyographic recordings during lumbosacral decompression and instrumentation. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(6):1318-1324.
28. Chen ZY, Wong HK, Chan YH. Variability of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(6):470-476.
29. York DH, Chabot RJ, Gaines RW. Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(9):864-876. (Pubitemid 18031911)
30. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 9D: Guidelines on short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23(2): 168-179.
31. + at critical levels of brain ischemia. Stroke. 1977;8(1):51-57.
32. Branston NM, Symon L, Crockard HA, Pasztor E. Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. Exp Neurol. 1974;45(2):195-208.
33. Astrup J, Blennow G, Nilsson B. Effects of reduced cerebral blood flow upon EEG pattern, cerebral extracellular potassium, and energy metabolism in the rat cortex during bicuculline-induced seizures. Brain Res. 1979;177(1):115-126. (Pubitemid 10239023)
34. Symon L. The relationship between CBF, evoked potentials and the clinical features in cerebral ischaemia. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1980;78:175-190.
35. Kalkman CJ, ten Brink SA, Been HD, Bovill JG. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potentials during spinal surgery: Effects of anesthetic technique and high-pass digital filtering. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(8):924-929.
36. York DH, Chabot RJ, Gaines RW. Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(9):864-876. (Pubitemid 18031911)
37. More RC, Nuwer MR, Dawson EG. Cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: Sensitivity, specificity, reliability, and criteria for alarm. J Spinal Disord. 1988;1(1):75-80. (Pubitemid 19152630)
38. Astrup J, Siesjo BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischemia: The ischemic penumbra. Stroke. 1981;12(6):723-725. (Pubitemid 12227362)
39. Young AR, Touzani O, Derlon JM, Sette G, MacKenzie ET, Baron JC. Early reperfusion in the anesthetized baboon reduces brain damage following middle cerebral artery occlusion: A quantitative analysis of infarction volume. Stroke. 1997;28(3):632-637.
40. Furlan M, Marchal G, Viader F, Derlon JM, Baron JC. Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Ann Neurol. 1996;40(2):216-226. (Pubitemid 26274557)
41. Branston NM, Symon L, Strong AJ. Reversibility of ischaemically induced changes in extracellular potassium in primate cortex. J Neurol Sci. 1978;37(1-2):37-49. (Pubitemid 8350302)
42. Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1990;2(2):161-192.
43. Lopez JR. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1996;34(4):33-54. (Pubitemid 26404376)
44. Florence G, Guerit JM, Gueguen B. Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room. Neurophysiol Clin. 2004;34(1):17-32. (Pubitemid 38367892)
45. Khan MH, Smith PN, Balzer JR, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: Experience with 508 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(4):E105-E113. (Pubitemid 43361729)
46. Smith PN, Balzer JR, Khan MH, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in nonmyelopathic patients: A review of 1,039 cases. Spine J. 2007;7(1):83-87. (Pubitemid 46002536)
47. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, Regel J, Schaefer H, Stolke D. False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: Analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(2):280-286. (Pubitemid 38183539)
48. Schepens MA, Boezeman EH, Hamerlijnck RP, ter Beek H, Vermeulen FE. Somatosensory evoked potentials during exclusion and reperfusion of critical aortic segments in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Card Surg. 1994;9(6):692-702. (Pubitemid 24359425)
49. Chatrian GE, Berger MS, Wirch AL. Discrepancy between intraoperative SSEP's and postoperative function: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1988;69(3):450-454.
50. Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA. Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1985;63(2):296-300. (Pubitemid 15246100)
51. Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H, et al. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol. 1986;19(1):22-25. (Pubitemid 16137975)
52. Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, Mahla M, Day AL. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1991;29(1):83-88.
53. Holland NR. Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: Implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15(5):439-446. (Pubitemid 28515980)
54. Krieger D, Adams HP, Albert F, von Haken M, HackeW. Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: Case report. Neurosurgery. 1992;31(1):145-150.
55. Szelenyi A, Bueno de Camargo A, Flamm E, Deletis V. Neurophysiological criteria for intraoperative prediction of pure motor hemiplegia during aneurysm surgery: Case report. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(3):575-578. (Pubitemid 37040422)
56. Galla JD, Ergin MA, Lansman SL, et al. Use of somatosensory evoked potentials for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6): 1947-1952. (Pubitemid 29301387)
57. GrieppRB,ErginMA,Galla JD,Klein JJ, SpielvogelD,GrieppEB.Minimizing spinal cord injury during repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms: The Mount Sinai approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;10(1):25-28.
58. Robertazzi RR, Cunningham JN Jr. Intraoperative adjuncts of spinal cord protection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;10(1):29-34.
59. Robertazzi RR, Cunningham JN Jr. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials: A primer on the intraoperative detection of spinal cord ischemia during aortic reconstructive surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;10(1): 11-17.
60. Shahin GM, Hamerlijnck RP, Schepens MA, Ter Beek HT, Vermeulen FE, Boezeman EH. Upper and lower extremity somatosensory evoked potential recording during surgery for aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(5):299-304. (Pubitemid 126690735)
61. de Haan P, Kalkman CJ. Spinal cord monitoring: Somatosensory- and motorevoked potentials. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001;19(4):923-945. (Pubitemid 33152045)
62. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2440-2449. (Pubitemid 350086334)
63. Szelenyi A,KothbauerK, deCamargo AB,LangerD, FlammES,Deletis V.Motor evoked potentialmonitoringduringcerebral aneurysmsurgery: Technical aspects andcomparison of transcranial and direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4)(suppl):331-338.
64. MacDonald DB, Janusz M. An approach to intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19(1):43-54. (Pubitemid 34242493)
65. Guerit JM, Verhelst R, Rubay J, Khoury G,Matta A,Dion R.Multilevel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for spinal cord monitoring in descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(2):93-103.
66. Taunt CJ Jr, Sidhu KS, Andrew SA. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(17):1970-1972. (Pubitemid 41292221)
67. Banoub M, Tetzlaff JE, Schubert A. Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials: Implications for perioperative monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):716-737. (Pubitemid 37051989)
68. Sebel PS, Erwin CW, NevilleWK. Effects of halothane and enflurane on far and near field somatosensory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59(12):1492-1496. (Pubitemid 18002566)
69. Sloan TB. Anesthetic effects on electrophysiologic recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15(3):217-226. (Pubitemid 28376422)
70. Paisansathan C, Koenig HM, Wheeler PJ, Baughman VL, Hoffman WE. Loss of SSEP during sitting craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15(4):327-329. (Pubitemid 37210919)
71. Wiese M, Kramer J, Bernsmann K, Ernst Willburger R. The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon's experience: Comparative studies. Spine J. 2004;4(5):550-556. (Pubitemid 40029172)
72. Heller AC, Padilla RV, Mamelak AN. Complications of epilepsy surgery in the first 8 years after neurosurgical training. Surg Neurol. 2009;71(6):631-637.