Variability of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 470-476

  Chen, Zheng Yong ^a   Wong, Hee Kit ^a   Chan, Yiong Huak ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Intraoperative monitoring; Isoflurane; Mean arterial pressure; Scoliosis; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ISOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NERVE STIMULATION; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE SURGERY; WOUND CLOSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY TEMPERATURE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY TEMPERATURE; CHILD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOFLURANE; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 16644370560     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000133465.89618.c8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carson LG, et al. SEP spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:6-11.
2. Daube JR. Intra-operative monitoring reduces complications and is therefore useful. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1151-1153.
3. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim EA, et al. Spinal cord monitoring: Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine. 1991;16(suppl):S361-S364.
4. Lubicky JP, Spadaro JA, Yuan HA, et al. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery. Spine. 1989; 14:790-798.
5. Machida M, Weinstein SL, Yameda T, et al. Spinal cord monitoring: electrophysiological measure of sensory and motor function during spinal surgery. Spine. 1985;10:407-413.
6. Nash CL Jr, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, et al. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop. 1977;126:100-105.
7. Owen JH. The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity. Spine. 1999;24:2649-2662.
8. Pereon Y, Nguyen THE, Tich S, et al. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine. 1999;24:1169-1170.
9. Engler GL, Spielholz NJ, Bernhard WN, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials during Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:528-532.
10. Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1620-1630.
11. Macri S, De Monte A, Greggi T, et al. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring in orthopaedics. Spine Cord. 2000;38:133-139.
12. Keith RW, Stambough JL, Awender SH. Somatosensory cortical evoked potentials: a review of 100 cases of intraoperative spinal surgery monitoring. J Spinal Disord. 1990;3:220-226.
13. Luk KL, Hu Y, Wong YW, et al. Variability of somatosensory evoked potentials in different stages of scoliosis surgery. Spine. 1999;24:1799-1804.
14. Nash CL, Jr. Brown RH. Current concepts review: Spinal cord monitoring. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1406-1409.
15. Kalman CJ, Brink SA, Been HD, et al. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potentials during spinal surgery: effects of anesthetic technique and high-pass digital filtering. Spine. 1991;16:924-926.
16. Nuwer MR, Dawson E. Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord: enhanced stability of cortical recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;59:318-327.
17. Tinazzi M, Zanette G, Fiaschi A, et al. Effect of stimulus rate on the cortical posterior tibial nerve SEPs: a topographic study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;100:210-219.
18. American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;4: 397-416.
19. McPherson RW, Mahla M, Johnson R, et al. Effects of enflurane, isoflurane and nitrous oxide on somatosensory evoked potentials during fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1985;62:626-633.
20. Sloan TB. Anesthesia during spinal surgery with electrophysiological monitoring. Semin Spine Surg. 1997;9:302-308.
21. Boisseau N, Madany M, Staccini P, et al. Comparison of the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:785-789.
22. Wakasugi M, Hirota K, Roth S, et al. The effects of general anaesthetics on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:676-680.
23. Roy EP, Gutmann L, Riggs JE, et al. Inreaoperative somotosensory evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 1988;229:94-97.
24. Wilber RG, Thompson GH, Shaffer JW, et al. Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66:1178-1184.
25. Albanese SA, Spadaro JA, Lubicky JP, et al. Somatosensory cortical evoked potential changes after deformity correction. Spine. 1991;16 (suppl):S371-S374.
26. Ryan TP, Britt RH. Spinal and cortical somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during corrective spinal surgery with 108 patients. Spine. 1986;11:352-361.
27. Sloan TB. Anesthetic effects on electrophysiologic recording. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15:217-226.
28. Sloan TB, Koht A. Depression of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials by nitrous oxide. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57:849-852.