Perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of staff anaesthetists related to multi-source feedback used for their performance appraisal

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 372-377

  Castanelli, D ^a   Kitto, S ^b  

^a MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

anaesthetist; education, continuing

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MULTI SOURCE FEEDBACK; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 80051774029     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer152     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care. Ottawa: RCPSC, 2005. Available from thttp://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005-e.pdf (accessed April 5, 2011)
2. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2006. Available from thttp://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/GMP-0910.pdf (accessed April 5, 2011)
3. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007;29:855-71
4. Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, et al. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? Med Educ 2007;41:1039-49 (Pubitemid 350029289)
5. Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review. Br Med J 2010;341:c5064
6. Morris A, Hewitt J, Roberts CM. Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:285-88
7. Archer JC, Norcini JJ, Davies HA. Peer review of paediatricians in training using SPRAT. Br Med J 2005;330:1251-3 (Pubitemid 40780478)
8. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H. A multisource feedback program for anesthesiologists. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:33-9
9. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychol 2005;58:33-66 (Pubitemid 40622796)
10. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119:254-84 (Pubitemid 126042646)
11. Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Lazaridis EN, Skeff KM. Beneficial and harmful effects of augmented feedback on physicians' clinical teaching performance. Acad Med 1998;73:324-32 (Pubitemid 28128801)
12. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ 2007;41:583-91 (Pubitemid 46789583)
13. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-8
14. Noonan CLF, Monagle J, Castanelli D. Development of a multisource feedback tool for consultant anaesthetist performance. Aust Health Rev 2011;35:141-5
15. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, et al. Anaesthetists' non-technical skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:580-8 (Pubitemid 36592330)
16. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:94-9 (Pubitemid 36460296)
17. Merry AF, Davies JM, Maltby JR. Qualitative research in health care. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:552-5
18. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: ATreatise in the Sociologyof Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1966
19. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005
20. Taylor S, Bogdan R. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meaning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984
21. Kennedy TJT, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ 2006;40:101-8
22. Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbich C. Quality in qualitative research. Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Med J Aust 2008;188:243-6
23. Turner JC. Social comparison, similarity and ingroup-favouritism. In: Tajfel H, ed., Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 1978
24. Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organisation. Acad Manage Rev 1989;24:413-34
25. Leavitt HJ. Managerial Psychology, 3rd Edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1972
26. Fox NJ. The Social Meaning of Surgery. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1992
27. Hall P. Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers. J Interprof Care 2005;19(Suppl. 1):188-96 (Pubitemid 40960295)
28. Kitto SC, Gruen RL, Smith JA. Imagining a continuing interprofessional education program (CIPE) within surgical training. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2009;29:185-9
29. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday, 1959
30. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books, 1982
31. Smith AF, Greaves JD. Beyond competence: defining and promoting excellence in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2010;65:184-91
32. Armstrong M. Armstrong's Handbook of Performance Management, 4th Edn. London: Kogan Page, 2009