Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning-Potentials and implications for higher education

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 747-762

  Schneckenberg, Dirk ^a   Ehlers, Ulf ^b   Adelsberger, Heimo ^b  

^a RENNES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT; EASE OF USE; HIGHER EDUCATION; INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGY; LEARNING CYCLE; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY; PEDAGOGICAL MODEL; WEB 2.0;

E-LEARNING; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 80051768506     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01092.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Albrecht, S., Hartig-Perschke, R., &, Lübcke, M., (2007). Weblog-Kommunikation und Öffentlichkeit. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Bundestagswahlkampfs 2005. In, K.-S. Rehberg, (Ed.), Die Natur der Gesellschaft (pp. 1886-1898). Frankfurt a. M.: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel.
2. Allen, I. E., &, Seaman, J., (2008). Staying the course: online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
3. Anderson, P., (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved May 3, 2007
4. Attwell, G., (2009). Reflections on ONLINE EDUCA Berlin. Retrieved December 28, 2009
5. Bates, T., (2010). New challenges for universities: why they must change. In, U.-D. Ehlers, &, D. Schneckenberg, (Eds), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 15-27). New York: Springer International.
6. Baumgartner, P., (1993). Der Hintergrund des Wissens. Vorarbeiten zu einer Kritik der programmierbaren Vernunft. Universität Klagenfurt.
7. Boud, D., Keogh, R., &, Walker, D., (1985). Reflection: turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
8. Brockbank, A., &, McGill, I., (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
9. Bughin, J., &, Manyika J., (2009). How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0: McKinsey Global Survey Results. San Francisco: McKinsey and Company.
10. Canadian Council on Learning (2009). The state of e-learning in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Learning.
11. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., &, Frosch-Wilke, D., (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3, 4/5, 404-420.
12. Chesbrough, H.-W., (2003). Open innovation, the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Cowan, J., (1998). On becoming an innovative university teacher reflection in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press: McGraw-Hill Education.
14. Cross, J., (2010). They had people called professors. ! Changing worlds of learning: strengthening informal learning in formal institutions? In, U.-D. Ehlers, &, D. Schneckenberg, (Eds), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 43-55). New York: Springer International.
15. Dejoux, C., (1996). Organisation qualifiante et maturité en gestion des compétences. Personnel, 369, 61-67.
16. Dewey, J., (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
17. Downes, S., (2005). e-Learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, October 16, 2005. Retrieved December 29, 2009
18. Downes, S., (2007). Web 2.0 and your own learning and development. Retrieved November 7, 2007
19. Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., &, Meyer, I., (2010). Microblogs in higher education-a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 1, 92-100. Early View. Available online on January 4, 2010.
20. Ehlers, U.-D., (2007). Making the difference in e-learning: towards competence development and e-irritation. In, U. Bernath, &, A. Sangra, (Eds), Research in distance education and online learning, ASF Series Vol. 13 (pp. 157-171). Oldenburg: Universität Oldenburg.
21. Ehlers, U.-D., &, Schneckenberg, D., (Eds) (2010). Changing cultures in higher education. New York: Springer International.
22. Erpenbeck, J., (2005). Kompetenzmessung als Bildungscontrolling im E-Learning. In, U. Ehlers, &, P. Schenkel, (Eds), Weiterbildungscontrolling im E-Learning: Jenseits des roi (pp. 217-229). Heidelberg: Springer.
23. Euler, D., &, Hahn, A., (2004). Wirtschaftsdidaktik. Bern: Haupt.
24. European Commission (1999). Bologna declaration-joint declaration of ministers of education. Brussels. Retrieved December 12, 2007
25. Garrison, D., (2004). E-learning in the 21st century. London: Taylor & Francis.
26. González, J., &, Wagenaar, R., (Eds) (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Deusto: Universidad de Deusto.
27. Goos, M., &, Manning, A., (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarization of work in Britain. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 118-133.
28. Happ, S., (2008). The changing world of e-learning. Retrieved December 27, 2009
29. Heyse, V., &, Erpenbeck, J., (1997). Der Sprung über die Kompetenzbarriere: Kommunikation, selbst-organisiertes Lernen und Kompetenzentwicklung von und in Unternehmen. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Verlag.
30. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2004). ePortfolio best practice and implementation guide. Retrieved December 18, 2007
31. Kahiigi, E. K., Ekenberg, L., Hansson, H., Tusubira, F. F., &, Danielson, M., (2008). Exploring the e-learning state of art. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 6, 2, 77-88.
32. Kane, K., Robinson-Combre, J., &, Berge, Z. L., (2010). Tapping into social networking: collaborating enhances both knowledge management and e-learning. VINE, 40, 1, 62-70.
33. Katz, L. F., &, Kearney, M. S., (2006). The polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 96, 2, 189-194.
34. Kerres, M., (2006). Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen. In, A. Hohenstein, &, K. Wilbers, (Eds), Handbuch E-Learning: Expertenwissen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 1-16). München: Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst.
35. Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
36. Kolb, D. A., &, Kolb, A. Y., (2005). Learning style inventory-version 3.1 2005. Technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Group.
37. Leese, M., (2009). Out of class - out of mind? The use of a virtual learning environment to encourage student engagement in out of class activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 1, 70-77.
38. Lemieux, T., (2006). Increasing residual wage inequality: composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skill? American Economic Review, 96, 2, 1-64.
39. Mandl, H., Gruber, H., &, Renkl, A., (1997). Lernen und Lehren mit dem Computer. In, F. E. Weinert, &, H. Mandl, (Eds), Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung (pp. 437-467). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
40. Mandl, H., &, Krause, U.-M., (2001). Lernkompetenz für die Wissensgesellschaft. Forschungsbericht Nr. 145. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
41. Mc Afee, A., (2006). Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Review, 47, 3, 21-29.
42. McAfee, A., (2009). Enterprise 2.0: new collaborative tools for your organizations toughest challenges. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43. Moon, J., (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development theory and practice. London: Routledge.
44. Musser, J., &, OReilly, T., (2006). Web 2.0-principles and best practices. Sebastopol, CA: OReilly Media.
45. Niemeier, J., (2008). The changing world of e-learning industry and the need for common standards along the supply chain. Presentation made at the Stuttgart 2008 Open Forum on e-Learning Standards and Industry.
46. North, K., &, Reinhardt, K., (2003). Transparency and transfer of individual competencies-a concept of integrative competence management. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9, 12, 1372-1381.
47. OECD (2005). E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD.
48. OReilly, T., (2005). What is Web 2.0? Retrieved December 12, 2007
49. Privateer, P. M., (1999). Academic technology and the future of higher education: strategic paths not to take. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 60-79.
50. Proctor, R. W., &, Dutta, A., (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. London: Sage.
51. Salmon, G., (2010). Learning Innovation for the Twenty-First Century. In, U-D. Ehlers, &, D. Schneckenberg, (Eds), Changing Cultures in Higher Education (pp. 27-43). New York: Springer International.
52. Salzgeber, G., (1996). Reflexion (in) der Praxissituation im Projektstudium Betriebs-pädagogik. Eine Lehr-Geschichte zur Ausbildung von Studierenden im Umgang mit komplexen, unsicheren, einzigartigen, wert- und interessenbeladenen Praxissituationen. Innsbruck, Austria: Universität Innsbruck.
53. Schneckenberg, D., (2008). Educating tomorrows knowledge workers. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.
54. Schneckenberg, D., &, Wildt, J., (2006). Understanding the concept of ecompetence for academic staff. In, I. Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, &, J. Wildt, (Eds), The challenge of ecompetence in academic staff development (pp. 29-35). Galway: National University of Ireland Galway.
55. Schön, D., (1986). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Sclater, N., (2008). Web 2.0, personal learning environments and the future of learning management systems. Educause Research Bulletin, 13. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.
57. Seufert, S., (2007). Ne(x)t Generation Learning-was gibt es Neues über das Lernen? In, S. Seufert, &, T. Brahm, (Eds), Ne(x)t Generation Learning: Wikis, Blogs, Mediacasts & Co.-Social Software und Personal Broadcasting auf der Spur (pp. 2-19). St. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen.
58. Sfard, A., (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 2, 4-13. (Pubitemid 128056715)
59. Spitz-Oener, A., (2006). Technical change, job tasks and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 235-270. (Pubitemid 43617365)
60. Stieler-Lorenz, B., &, Krause, A., (2003). Mit E-Learning zum I-Learning-die Herausforderung zur kompetenzförderlichen Lernkulturgestaltung. QUEM Report, Heft, 80, 75-136.
61. van der Blij, M., Boon, J., van Lieshout, H., Schafer, H., &, Schrijen, H., (2002). Competentieprofielen. Over schillen en knoppen. Utrecht: Digitale Universiteit.
62. Varner, D., &, Peck, S., (2003). Learning from learning journals: the benefits and challenges of using learning journal assignments. Journal of Management Education, 27, 1, 52-77. (Pubitemid 36195583)
63. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., &, Davis, F. D., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.
64. Vince, R., (2009). Learning and the unconscious: connecting learning, space and the unconscious in organizations. Conference Paper presented at OLKC 2009 Conference in Amsterdam.
65. Weinert, F. E., (1999). Definition and selection of competencies-concepts of competence. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research.
66. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., &, Wheeler, D., (2009). The good, the bad and the wiki: evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 6, 987-995.
67. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., &, Milligan, C., (2006). Personal learning environments: challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Retrieved December 18, 2009
68. World Economic Forum (2008). Report of the Global Advisory Committee on Technology and Education. Dubai: World Economic Forum.
69. Zawacki-Richter, O., (2004). Kompetenzkapital: Ansätze des betrieblichen Kompetenz-managements und E-Learning-Szenarien. In, J. Hasebrook, O. Zawacki-Richter, &, J. Erpenbeck, (Eds), Kompetenzkapital-Verbindungen Zwischen Kompetenzbilanzen Und Humankapital, (pp. 237-269). Frankfurt a. M.: Bankakademie Verlag.