Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice

Biology Letters

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 528-531

  Lenton, Alison P ^a   Francesconi, Marco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice overload; Choice quality; Choice variety; Human behaviour; Mate choice

Indexed keywords

AGE; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; HEIGHT; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; OCCUPATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARRIAGE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARRIAGE;

EID: 80051679620     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0098     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wasserman, E. A.,Young,M. E.&Cook,R.G. 2004Variability discrimination in humans and animals. Am. Psychol. 59, 879-890. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.9. 879).
2. Hutchinson, J. M. C. 2005 Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biol. Rev. 80, 73-92. (doi:10.1017/S1464793104006554). (Pubitemid 40204266)
3. Kahn, B. E. &Wansink, B. 2004 The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J. Consum. Res. 30, 519-534. (doi:10.1086/ 380286).
4. Greifeneder, R., Scheibehenne, B. &Kleber, N. 2010 Less may be more when choosing is difficult: Choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Psychol. 133, 45-50. (doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.005).
5. Lurie, N. H. 2004 Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. J. Consum. Res. 30, 473-486. (doi:10.1086/380283) . (Pubitemid 38545478)
6. Swait, J.&Adamowicz,W. 2001 The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent classmodel of decision strategy switching. J. Consum. Res. 28, 135-148. (doi:10. 1086/321952).
7. Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D. &Deutsch, J. C. 1996 Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50, 1382-1391. (doi:10.2307/ 2410876).
8. Luttbeg, B. 2002 Assessing the robustness and optimality of alternative decision rules with varying assumptions. Anim. Behav. 63, 805-814. (doi:10.1006/anbe. 2001.1979).
9. Bailey, N. W. 2008 Love will tear you apart: Different components of female choice exert contrasting selection on males. Behav. Ecol. 19, 960-966. (doi:10.1093/ beheco/arn054).
10. Heitmann,M., Herrmann, A.&Kaiser, C. 2007 The effect of product variety on purchase probability. Rev.Manag. Sci. 1, 111-131. (doi:10.1007/s11846-007-0006-6).
11. Fawcett, T. W. &Johnstone, R. A. 2003 Optimal assessment of multiple cues. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1637-1643. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2328). (Pubitemid 36960296)
12. Johnstone, R. A. &Earn, D. J. D. 1999 Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45, 277-281. (doi:10.1007/ s002650050562). (Pubitemid 29160533)
13. Luttbeg, B. 2004 Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics. Behav. Ecol. 15, 239-247. (doi:10.1093/ beheco/arh002). (Pubitemid 38492726)
14. Jennions, M. D. &Petrie, M. 1997 Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72, 283-327. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00015.x). (Pubitemid 27207611)
15. Kokko, H., Sutherland, W. J., Lindström, J., Reynolds, J. D. &Mackenzie, A. 1998 Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power. Anim. Behav. 56, 755-762. (doi:10.1006/anbe. 1998.0815). (Pubitemid 28463586)
16. Widemo, F. &Owens, I. P. F. 1995 Lek size, male mating skew, and the evolution of lekking. Nature 373, 148-151. (doi:10.1038/373148a0).
17. Lenton, A. P., Fasolo, B. &Todd, P. M. 2009 The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans. Anim. Behav. 77, 55-60. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.025).
18. Miller, G. F. &Todd, P. M. 1998 Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 190-198. (doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(98)01169-3). (Pubitemid 28396461)
19. Valone, T. J., Nordell, S. E., Giraldeau, L.-A. &Templeton, J. J. 1996 The empirical question of thresholds and mechanisms of mate choice. Evol. Ecol. 10, 447-455. (doi:10.1007/BF01237729).
20. Shannon, C. E. 1948 A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379-423. and 623-656..
21. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B. &Lenton, A. P. 2007 Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15 011-15 016. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0705290104). (Pubitemid 47619584)
22. Lenton, A. P., Fasolo, B. &Todd, P. M. 2008 'Shopping' for a mate: Expected versus experienced preferences in online mate choice. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 51, 169-182. (doi:10.1109/TPC.2008.2000342)