The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-60

  Lenton, Alison P ^a   Fasolo, Barbara ^b   Todd, Peter M ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

choice strategy; cue; Homo sapiens; humans; mate choice; mating skew; number of options; sexual selection; speed dating

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; HOMINID; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALIA; HOMO SAPIENS;

EID: 57449098416     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alberts S.C., Watts H.E., and Altmann J. Queuing and queue-jumping: long-term patterns of reproductive skew in male savannah baboons, Papio cynocephalus. Animal Behaviour 65 (2003) 821-840
2. Andersson S. Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25 (1989) 403-410
3. Bateson M., and Healy S.D. Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20 (2005) 659-664
4. Buss D.M., and Barnes M.L. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 50 (1986) 559-570
5. Buston P.M., and Emlen S.T. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 10 (2003) 8805-8810
6. Candolin U. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews 78 (2003) 575-595
7. Charpentier M., Peignot P., Hossaert-McKey M., Gimenez O., Setchell J.M., and Wickings E.J. Constraints on control: factors influencing reproductive success in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Behavioral Ecology 16 (2005) 614-623
8. Constable J., Ashley M., Goodall J., and Pusey A. Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees. Molecular Ecology 10 (2001) 1279-1300
9. Cowlishaw G., and Dunbar R.I.M. Dominance rank and mating success in male primates. Animal Behaviour 41 (1991) 1045-1056
10. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd edn (1874), J. Murray, London
11. Fawcett T.W., and Johnstone R.A. Optimal assessment of multiple cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270 (2003) 1637-1643
12. Finkel E.J., Eastwick P.W., and Matthews J. Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: a methodological primer. Personal Relationships 14 (2007) 149-166
13. Fisher H. Evolution of human serial pairbonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78 (1989) 331-354
14. Fiske P., Rintamäki P.T., and Karvonen E. Mating success in lekking males: a meta analysis. Behavioral Ecology 9 (1998) 328-338
15. Höglund J., and Alatalo R.V. Leks (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
16. Isvaran K. Variation in male mating behaviour within ungulate populations: patterns and processes. Current Science 89 (2005) 1192-1199
17. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews 72 (1997) 283-327
18. Johnstone R.A., and Earn D.J.D. Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45 (1999) 277-281
19. Judd C.M., and McClelland G.H. Data Analysis: a Model Comparison Approach (1989), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
20. Keller L., and Krieger M.J.B. Mating success of birds. Nature 380 (1996) 208-209
21. Kokko H., and Lindström J. Measuring mating skew. American Naturalist 149 (1997) 794-799
22. Kokko H., Mackenzie A., Reynolds J.D., Lindström J., and Sutherland W.J. Measures of inequality are not equal. American Naturalist 154 (1999) 358-382
23. Kurzban R., and Weeden J. HurryDate: mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 (2005) 227-244
24. Kutsukake N., and Nunn C.L. Comparative tests of reproductive skew in male primates: the roles of demographic factors and incomplete control. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60 (2006) 695-706
25. Lenton A.P., and Stewart A. Changing her ways: number of options and mate standard strength impact mate choice strategy and satisfaction. Judgment and Decision Making 7 (2008) 501-511
26. Lenton A.P., Fasolo B., and Todd P.M. 'Shopping' for a mate: expected vs. experienced preferences in online mate choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (Special Section: Darwinian Perspectives on Electronic Communication) 51 (2008) 169-182
27. Li N.P., Kenrick D.T., Bailey J.M., and Linsenmeier J.A.W. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 947-955
28. Luttbeg B. Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics. Behavioral Ecology 15 (2004) 239-247
29. Lykken D.T., and Tellegen A. Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 56-68
30. Møller A.P., and Pomiankowski A. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32 (1993) 167-176
31. Nonacs P. Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. American Naturalist 156 (2000) 577-589
32. Nonacs P. Measuring the reliability of skew indices: is there one best index?. Animal Behaviour 65 (2003) 615-627
33. Nonacs P. Skew Calculator 2003 (2003). http://www.eeb.ucla.edu/Faculty/Nonacs/SKEW%20CALCULATOR%202003.htm Retrieved 20 July 2007
34. Olson I.R., and Marshuetz C. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion 5 (2005) 498-502
35. Pamilo P., and Crozier R.H. Reproductive skew simplified. Oikos 75 (1996) 533-535
36. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., and Johnson E.J. The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Penke L., Todd P.M., Lenton A., and Fasolo B. How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions. In: Geher G., and Miller G.F. (Eds). Mating Intelligence: New Insights into Intimate Relationships, Human Sexuality, and the Mind's Reproductive System (2007), L. Erlbaum, Mahwah 37-76
38. Robson T.E., Goldizen A.W., and Green D.J. The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choice of mates?. Biology Letters 1 (2005) 1264-1267
39. Rosenqvist G. Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis ophidion. Animal Behaviour 39 (1990) 1110-1115
40. Snow D.W. A field study of the black and white manakin, Manacus manacus, in Trinidad. Zoologica 47 (1962) 65-104
41. Sullivan M.S. Mate choice as an information gathering process under time constraints: implications for behaviour and signal design. Animal Behaviour 47 (1994) 141-151
42. Symons D. The Evolution of Human Sexuality (1979), Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Tarof S.A., Ratcliffe L.M., Kasumovic M.M., and Boag P.T. Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks?. Behavioral Ecology 16 (2005) 207-217
44. Todd P.M., Penke L., Fasolo B., and Lenton A.P. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 104 (2007) 15011-15016
45. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (1972), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago 136-179
46. Tsuji K., and Tsuji N. Indices of reproductive skew depend on average reproductive success. Evolutionary Ecology 12 (1998) 141-152
47. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review 79 (1972) 281-299
48. Widemo F., and Owens I.P.F. Lek size, male mating skew, and the evolution of lekking. Nature 373 (1995) 148-151
49. Wikelski M., Carbone C., Bednikoff P., Choudhury S., and Tebbich S. Why is female choice not unanimous? Insights from costly mate sampling in marine iguanas. Ethology 107 (2001) 623-638