DNA barcodes for Mexican Cactaceae, plants under pressure from wild collecting

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 775-783

  Yesson, Chris ^a,d   Bárcenas, Rolando T ^b   Hernández, Héctor M ^c   de la Luz Ruiz Maqueda, María ^b   Prado, Alberto ^b,e   Rodríguez, Víctor M ^a   Hawkins, Julie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE QUERÉTARO   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^d INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conservation; DNA barcodes; Internal transcribed spacer; matK; Opuntioideae; Species identification

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RIBONUCLEIC ACID MATURASE; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; PRIMER DNA; RIBONUCLEASE; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CACTACEAE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MEXICO; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

BASE SEQUENCE; CACTACEAE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDORIBONUCLEASES; GENETIC VARIATION; MEXICO; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ARIOCARPUS; CACTACEAE; CACTOIDEAE; OPUNTIOIDEAE; UNIDENTIFIED PLANT;

EID: 80051677508     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03009.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson EF (2001) The Cactus Family. Timber Press Inc., Portland, Oregon.
2. Armstrong KF, Ball SL (2005) DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B-Biological Sciences, 360, 1813-1823.
3. Baldwin BG (1993) Molecular Phylogenetics of Calycadenia (Compositae) Based on ITS Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA - Chromosomal and Morphological Evolution Reexamined. American Journal of Botany, 80, 222-238.
4. Bárcenas-Luna RT (2003) Chihuahuan Desert Cacti in Mexico: an assessment of trade, management, and conservation priorities. In: Prickly trade: trade and conservation of Chihuahuan Desert cacti (ed. Robbins CS), pp. 1-65. Traffic, Washington, D.C.
5. Bárcenas-Luna RT (2006) Comercio de cactáceas mexicanas y perspectivas para su conservación. Biodiversitas - Boletín Bimestral de la Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, 68, 11-15.
6. Bárcenas RT, Yesson C, Hawkins JA (2011) Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae. Cladistics, doi:.
7. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12794-12797.
8. Chase MW, Knapp S, Cox AV et al. (2003) Molecular systematics, GISH and the origin of hybrid taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Annals of Botany, 92, 107-127.
9. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon, 56, 295-299.
10. Columbus JT, Kinney MS, Pant R, Siqueiros-Delgado ME (1998) Cladistic parsimony analysis of internal transcribed spacer region (nrDNA) sequences of Bouteloua and relatives (Gramineae: Chloridoideae). Aliso, 17, 99-130.
11. Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ, Savolainen V (2006) 300, 000 species to identify: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon, 55, 611-616.
12. Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW et al. (2002) Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany, 89, 132-144.
13. Drabkova L, Kirschner J, Vlcek C (2002) Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 20, 161-175.
14. Edwards D, Horn A, Taylor D, Savolain V, Hawkins J (2008) DNA barcoding of a large genus, Aspalathus L. (Fabaceae). Taxon, 57, 1317-1327.
15. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR et al. (2008) Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE, 3, e2802.
16. Hajibabaei M, Smith MA, Janzen DH et al. (2006) A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 959-964.
17. Hardesty BD, Hughes SL, Rodríguez VM, Hawkins JA (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci for the endangered cactus Echinocactus grusonii, and their cross-species utilization. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 164-167.
18. Harpke D, Peterson A (2008) Extensive 5.8S nrDNA polymorphism in Mammillaria (Cactaceae) with special reference to the identification of pseudogenic internal transcribed spacer regions. Journal of Plant Research, 121, 261-270.
19. Hartmann S, Nason J, Bhattacharya D (2001) Extensive ribosomal DNA genic variation in the columnar cactus Lophocereus. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 53, 124-134.
20. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 852-859.
21. Hughes SL, Rodríguez VM, Hardesty BD et al. (2008) Characterisation of microsatellite loci for the critically endangered cactus Ariocarpus bravoanus. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 1068-1070.
22. Hunt D (1999) CITES Cactaceae Checklist, 2nd edn. Kew, London.
23. Hunt D, Taylor N, Charles G (2006) The New Cactus Lexicon, Volumes I and II. DH Books, Milborne Port.
24. IUCN (2008) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available from (Downloaded on 12th August 2008).
25. Johnson LA, Soltis DE (1994) Matk DNA-Sequences and Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Saxifragaceae S-Str. Systematic Botany, 19, 143-156.
26. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: the Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region. PLoS ONE, 2, e508.
27. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369-8374.
28. Lahaye R, Van der Bank M, Bogarin D et al. (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2923-2928.
29. Little DP, Stevenson DW (2007) A comparison of algorithms for identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics, 23, 1-21.
30. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique, 84, 335-341.
31. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 480-490.
32. Nyffeler R (2002) Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany, 89, 312-326.
33. Ortega-Baes P, Godínez-Alvarez H (2006) Global Diversity and Conservation Priorities in the Cactaceae. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 817-827.
34. Posada D, Crandall K (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817-818.
35. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 1-2.
36. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD (2007) DNA barcoding in the cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of cycads. PLoS ONE, 2, e1154.
37. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany, 92, 142-166.
38. Starr J, Naczi R, Chouinard B (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and species resolution in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 151-163.
39. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods), Version 4.0 b10. Sinauar, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
40. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal-W - Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680.