Fast food in ant communities: How competing species find resources

Oecologia

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 229-240

  Pearce Duvet, Jessica M C ^a,b   Moyano, Martin ^a   Adler, Frederick R ^a   Feener Jr , Donald H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Community ecology; Forager density; Forager discovery capacity; Formicidae; Resource discovery

Indexed keywords

ANT; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CORRELATION; FOOD; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; RESOURCE USE;

ANIMAL; ANT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DESICCATION; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMIDITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANTS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ARIZONA; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DESICCATION; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMIDITY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEXAS;

ARIZONA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

FORMICIDAE;

EID: 80051668322     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1982-4     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adler FR, Gordon DM (1992) Information collection and spread by networks of patrolling ants. Am Nat 140: 373-400.
2. Adler FR, LeBrun EG, Feener DF (2007) Maintaining diversity in an ant community: modeling, extending, and testing the dominance-discovery trade-off. Am Nat 169: 323-333. doi: 10. 1086/510759.
3. Andersen AN (1991) Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust Ecol 16: 273-279. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1442-9993. 1991. tb01054. x.
4. Andersen AN (1992) Regulation of "momentary" diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. Am Nat 140: 401-420. doi: 10. 1086/285419.
5. Andersen AN (1997) Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia. J Biogeogr 24: 433-460. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2699. 1997. 00137. x.
6. Avgar T, Giladi I, Nathan R (2008) Linking traits of foraging animals to spatial patterns of plants: social and solitary ants generate opposing patterns of surviving seeds. Ecol Lett 11: 224-234. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2007. 01140. x.
7. Beckerman AP, Petchey OL, Warren PH (2006) Foraging biology predicts food web complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 13745-13749. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0603039103.
8. Beckerman A, Petchey OL, Morin PJ (2010) Adaptive foragers and community ecology: linking individuals to communities and ecosystems. Funct Ecol 24: 1-6. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2435. 2009. 01673. x.
9. Beckers R, Goss S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Colony size, communication, and ant foraging strategy. Psyche 96: 239-256. doi: 10. 1155/1989/94279.
10. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57: 289-300. doi: 10. 2307/2346101.
11. Bestelmeyer BT (2000) The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. J Anim Ecol 69: 998-1009. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2656. 2000. 00455. x.
12. Brown JS (1989) Desert rodent community structure: a test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol Monogr 59: 1-20. doi: 10. 2307/2937289.
13. Brown JH, Davidson DW (1977) Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science 196: 880-882. doi: 10. 1126/science. 196. 4292. 880.
14. Brown JH, Davidson DW, Reichman OJ (1979) An experimental study of competition between seed-eating desert rodents and ants. Am Zool 19: 1129-1143. doi: 10. 1093/icb/19. 4. 1129.
15. Brown JS, Kotler BP, Mitchell WA (1994) Foraging theory, patch use, and the structure of a Negev desert granivore community. Ecology 75: 2286-2300. doi: 10. 2307/1940884.
16. Calcagno V, Mouquet N, Jarne P, David P (2006) Co-existence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol Lett 9: 897-907. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2006. 00930. x.
17. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1997) Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. J Anim Ecol 66: 363-374. doi: 10. 2307/5982.
18. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1998a) Critical thermal limits in Mediterranean ant species: trade-off between mortality risk and foraging performance. Funct Ecol 12: 45-55. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2435. 1998. 00160. x.
19. Cerdá X, Retana J, Manzaneda A (1998b) The role of competition by dominants and temperature in the foraging of subordinate species in Mediterranean ant communities. Oecologia 117: 404-412. doi: 10. 1007/s004420050674.
20. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman & Hall, New York.
21. Davidson DW (1985) An experimental study of diffuse competition in harvester ants. Am Nat 125: 500-506. doi: 10. 1086/284358.
22. Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23: 484-490. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2311. 1998. 00145. x.
23. Davidson DW, Inouye RS, Brown JH (1984) Granivory in a desert ecosystem: experimental evidence for indirect facilitation of ants by rodents. Ecology 65: 1780-1786. doi: 10. 2307/1937774.
24. Davidson DW, Samson DA, Inouye RS (1985) Granivory in the Chihuahuan Desert: interactions within and between trophic levels. Ecology 66: 486-502. doi: 10. 2307/1940397.
25. Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Dornhaus A, Houston AI, McNamara JM, Collins EJ, Franks NR (2005) The hidden cost of information in collective foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B 272: 1689-1695. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2005. 3137.
26. Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100: 611. doi: 10. 1086/282455.
27. Feener DH Jr (2000) Is the assembly of ant communities mediated by parasitoids? Oikos 90: 79-88. doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2000. 900108. x.
28. Feener DF Jr, Orr MR, Wackford KM, Longo JM, Gilbert LE, Benson WW (2008) Geographic variation in resource dominance, discovery, and parasitoid-mediated competition in the Brazilian range of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta). Ecology 89: 1824-1836. doi: 10. 1890/07-0659. 1.
29. Fellers JH (1987) Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68: 1466-1478. doi: 10. 2307/1939230.
30. Fewell JH (1988) Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 401-408. doi: 10. 1007/BF00294977.
31. Garcia L (2003) Controlling the false discovery rate in ecological research. TREE 18: 553-554. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2003. 08. 011.
32. Gordon DM (1992) How colony growth affects forager intrusion in neighboring harvester ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 417-427. doi: 10. 1007/BF00170609.
33. Gordon DM (1995) The expandable network of ant exploration. Anim Behav 50: 995-1007. doi: 10. 1016/0003-3472(95)80100-6.
34. Harkness RD, Maroudas NG (1985) Central place foraging by an ant (Cataglyphis bicolor Fab.): a model for searching. Anim Behav 33: 916-928. doi: 10. 1016/S0003-3472(85)80026-9.
35. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
36. Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80: 238-251. doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0238: CMUTDO]2. 0. CO; 2.
37. Human KG, Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105: 405-412. doi: 10. 1007/BF00328744.
38. Jaffe K, Deneubourg JL (1992) On foraging, recruitment systems and optimum number of scouts in eusocial colonies. Insect Soc 39: 201-213. doi: 10. 1007/bf01249295.
39. Johnson LK, Hubbell SP, Feener DH Jr (1987) Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies. Am Zool 27: 347-358. doi: 10. 1093/icb/27. 2. 347.
40. Jones SR, Phillips SA Jr (1990) Resource collecting abilities of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) compared with those of three sympatric Texas ants. Southwest Nat 35: 416-422.
41. Jones M, Mandelik Y, Dayan T (2001) Coexistence of temporally partitioned spiny mice: roles of habitat structure and foraging behavior. Ecology 82: 2164-2176. doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2164: COTPSM]2. 0. CO; 2.
42. Jordan R, Blüthgen N (2007) No evidence for dominance-discovery trade-off among Formica pratensis colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 10: 7-10.
43. Kaspari M (1993a) Body size and microclimate use in Neotropical granivorous ants. Oecologia 96: 500-507. doi: 10. 1007/BF00320507.
44. Kaspari M (1993b) Removal of seeds from Neotropical frugivore droppings: ant responses to seed number. Oecologia 95: 81-88. doi: 10. 1093/icb/27. 2. 347.
45. Kaspari M (2001) Taxonomic level, trophic biology and the regulation of local abundance. Global Ecol Biogeogr 10: 229-244. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1466-822X. 2001. 00214. x.
46. Kaspari M, Weiser MD (1999) The size-grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants. Funct Ecol 13: 530-538. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2435. 1999. 00343. x.
47. Kaspari M, O'Donnell S, Kercher JR (2000) Energy, density, and contraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. Am Nat 155: 280-293.
48. Kneitel JM, Chase JM (2004) Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett 7: 69-80. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1461-0248. 2003. 00551. x.
49. Kondoh M (2003) Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 299: 1388-1391. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1079154.
50. Kotler BP, Brown JS (1988) Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 19: 281-307. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. es. 19. 110188. 001433.
51. LeBrun EG (2005) Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies. Oecologia 142: 643-652. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-004-1763-4.
52. LeBrun EG, Feener DH Jr (2007) When trade-offs interact: the balance of terror enforces the dominance-discovery trade-off in a local ant assemblage. J Anim Ecol 76: 58-64. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2656. 2006. 01173. x.
53. Lessard JP, Dunn R, Sanders N (2009) Temperature-mediated coexistence in temperate forest ant communities. Insect Soc 56: 149-156. doi: 10. 1007/s00040-009-0006-4.
54. Lighton JRB, Feener DH Jr (1989) Water-loss rate and cuticular permeability in foragers of the desert ant Pogonomyrmex rugosus. Physiol Zool 62: 1232-1256.
55. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100: 603-609.
56. Morrison LW (1996) Community organization in a recently assembled fauna: the case of Polynesian ants. Oecologia 107: 243-256. doi: 10. 1007/BF00327909.
57. Morrison LW (2000) Mechanisms of interspecific competition among an invasive and two native fire ants. Oikos 90: 238-252. doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2000. 900204. x.
58. Muenchow G (1986) Ecological use of failure time analysis. Ecology 67: 246-250. doi: 10. 2307/1938524.
59. Pearce-Duvet JMC, Feener DF Jr (2010) Resource discovery in ant communities: do food type and quantity matter? Ecol Entomol 35: 549-556. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2311. 2010. 01214. x.
60. Pontin AJ (1963) Further considerations of competition and the ecology of the ants Lasius flavus (F.) and L. niger (L.). J Anim Ecol 32: 565-574. doi: 10. 2307/2608.
61. Pulliam HR (1985) Foraging efficiency, resource partitioning, and the coexistence of sparrow species. Ecology 66: 1829-1836.
62. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
63. Roulston TH, Silverman J (2002) The effect of food size and dispersion pattern on retrieval rate by the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 15: 633-648. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1020791705673.
64. Santini G, Tucci L, Ottonetti L, Frizzi F (2007) Competition trade-offs in the organization of a Mediterranean ant assemblage. Ecol Entomol 32: 319-326. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2311. 2007. 00882. x.
65. Sarty M, Abbott K, Lester P (2006) Habitat complexity facilitates coexistence in a tropical ant community. Oecologia 149: 465-473. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-006-0453-9.
66. Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1988) A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51: 135-155. doi: 10. 2307/3565636.
67. Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K, Wuorenrinne H (1989) Ant assemblages in the Taiga biome: testing the role of territorial wood ants. Oecologia 81: 481-486. doi: 10. 1007/BF00378955.
68. Schmid-Hempel P (1987) Foraging characteristics of the desert ant Cataglyphis. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective foraging behavior in social insects: les Treilles Workshop. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 43-61.
69. Therneau T (2007) Package "survival:" survival analysis, including penalised likelihood (in R package version 2. 32). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
70. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Pankratz VS (2003) Penalized survival models and frailty. J Comput Graph Stat 12: 1-20. doi: 10. 1198/1061860031365.
71. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
72. Traniello JFA (1983) Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): behavioural and ecological aspects of recruitment communication. Oecologia 59: 94-100. doi: 10. 1007/BF00388080.
73. Tschinkel WR (1988) Colony growth and the ontogeny of worker polymorphism in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 103-115. doi: 10. 1007/BF00303545.
74. Vepsäläinen K, Pisarski B (1982) Assembly of island ant communities. Ann Zool Fenn 19: 327-335.
75. Vincent T, Scheel D, Brown J, Vincent T (1996) Trade-offs and coexistence in consumer-resource models: it all depends on what and where you eat. Am Nat 148: 1038-1058.
76. Weast RC (1973) Handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Cleveland.
77. Wehner R (1987) Spatial organisation of foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib desert). In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective foraging behavior in social insects: les Treilles Workshop. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 15-42.
78. Weier JA, Feener DH (1995) Foraging in the seed-harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex: are energy costs important? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 291-300. doi: 10. 1007/BF00167790.
79. Werner EE (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. Am Nat 140: S5. doi: 10. 1086/285395.
80. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33: 125-159. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 33. 010802. 150452.
81. Wiescher PT, Pearce-Duvet JMC, Feener DH Jr. (2011) Environmental context alters ecological trade-offs controlling ant existence in a spatially heterogenous region. Ecol Entomol (accepted).
82. Wilson EO (1975) Enemy specification in the alarm-recruitment system of an ant. Science 190: 798-800. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1198097.
83. Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 141-154. doi: 10. 1007/BF00299195.
84. Wilson EO (1978) Division of labor in fire ants based on physical castes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Solenopsis). J Kansas Entomol Soc 51: 615-636.
85. Ziv Y, Abramsky Z, Kotler B, Subach A (1993) Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos 66: 237-246.