Anatomical accuracy of abdominal lesion localization: Retrospective automatic rigid image registration between FDG-PET and MRI

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 147-154

  Kiefer, A ^a   Kuwert, T ^a   Hahn, D ^b   Hornegger, J ^b   Uder, M ^a   Ritt, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

FDG; Image fusion; MRI. image registration; PET

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIVER INJURY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS INJURY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SPLEEN INJURY;

ABDOMINAL NEOPLASMS; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 80051662561     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0364     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bockisch A, Freudenberg LS, Schmidt D et al. Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT and PET/CT: Proven outcomes in cancer imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39: 276-289.
2. Boss A, Bisdas S, Kolb A et al. Hybrid PET/MRI of intracranial masses: Inital experiences and comparison to PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 1198-1205.
3. Borgwardt L, Hojgaard L, Carstensen H et al. Increased fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in childhood CNS tumors is correlated with malignancy grade: A study with FDG positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging coregistration and image fusion. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3030-3037.
4. Cizek J, Herholz K, Vollmar S et al. Fast and robust registration of PET and MR images of human brain. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 434-442.
5. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall LT, Wahl RL. PETCT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 721-726.
6. Dawood M, Büther F, Lang N et al. Transforming Static CT in Gated PET/CT Studies to Multiple Respiratory Phases. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of Pattern Recognition 2006.
7. Donati O, Hany T, Reiner C et al. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 692-699.
8. Donati O, Reiner C, Hany T et al. 18F-FDG-PET and MRI in patients with malignancies of the liver and pancreas accuracy of retrospective multimodality image registration by using the CT-component of PET/CT. Nuklearmedizin 2010; 49: 106-114.
9. Even-Sapir E, Keidar Z, Bar-Shalom R. Hybrid Imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT)-improving the diagnostic accuracy of functional/metabolic and anatomic imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39: 264-275.
10. Goerres GW, Burger C, Schwitter MR et al. PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 734-739.
11. Hahn DA, Daum V, Hornegger J. Automatic Parameter Selection for Multimodal Image Registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29: 1140-1155.
12. Herzog H, Pietrzyk U, Shah NJ et al. The current state, challenges and perspectives of MR-PET. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 2072-2082.
13. Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF, Newport DF et al. Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging. Nat Med 2008; 14: 459-465.
14. Kawano T, Ohtake E, Inoue T. Deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT versus free breathing PET/CT and respiratory-gating PET for reference: evaluation of 95 patients with lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2011; 25: 109-116.
15. Kim JH, Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach MS et al. Comparison between F-18-FDG PET, in-line PET/CT, and software fusion for restaging of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 587-595.
16. Nomayr A, Romer W, Hothorn T et al. Anatomical accuracy of lesion localization - Retrospective interactive rigid image registration between 18F-FDGPET and X-ray CT. Nuklearmedizin 2005; 44: 149-155.
17. Ollinger JM. Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET. Phys Med Biol 1996; 41: 153-176.
18. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y et al. Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 603-606.
19. Palmedo H, Bucerius J, Joe A et al. Integrated PET/ CT in differentiated thyroid cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 616-624.
20. Papathanassiou D, Liehn JC, Bourgeot B et al. Cesium attenuation correction of the liver dome revealing hepatic lesion missed with computed tomography attenuation correction because of the repiratory motion artifact. Clin Nucl Med 2005; 30: 120-121.
21. Paschos KA, Bird N. Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Hippokratia 2008; 12: 132-138.
22. Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF. PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1077-1086.
23. Pichler BJ, Kolb A, Nägele T et al. PET/MRI: Paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 333-336.
24. Rousset OG, Yilong M, Evans AC. Correction of partial volume effects in PET: Principal and validation. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 904-911.
25. Sarikaya I, Yeung H, Erdi Y et al. Respiratory artefact causing malpositioning of liver dome lesion in right lower lung. Clin Nucl Med 2003; 28: 943-944.
26. Schlemmer HPW, Pichler BJ, Schmand M et al. Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: Feasibility study. Radiology 2008; 248: 1028-1035.
27. Schöder H, Larson SM, Yeung HW. PET/CT in oncology: Integration into clinical management of lymphoma, melanoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 72S-81S.
28. Slomka PJ, Baum RP. Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 44-55.
29. Slomka PJ, Dey D, Przetak C et al. Automated 3-dimensional registration of stand-alone 18F-FDG whole-body PET with CT. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1156-1167.
30. Somer EJ, Benatar NA, O'Doherty MJ et al. Use of the CT component of PET-CT to improve PET-MR registration: demonstration in soft-tissue sarcoma. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 6991-7006.
31. Thees S, Kendziorra K, Marwede D et al. Towards a software based PET/MR: A new approach for highly accurate registration of PET and MRI scull base to inguinal imaging. Nuklearmedizin 2009; 48: V16.
32. Vogel WV, van Dalent JA, Wiering B et al. Evaluation of image registration in PET/CT of the liver and recommendations for optimized imaging. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 910-919.
33. Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS, Wiehr S et al. Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 56-68.
34. Wolz G, Nomayr A, Hothorn T et al. Anatomical accuracy of interactive and automated rigid registration between X-ray CT and FDG-PET. Nuklearmedizin 2007; 46: 43-48.
35. Wolz G, Nömayr A, Hothorn T et al. Comparison of performance between rigid and non-rigid software registering CT to FDG-PET. Int J Comp Assist Radiol Surg 2007; 2: 183-190.
36. Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Alavi A. The clinical role of fusion imaging using PET, CT, and MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 133-149.