Computer vision syndrome: A review of ocular causes and potential treatments

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 502-515

  Rosenfield, Mark ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Computer vision; Convergence; Dry eye; Near vision; Reading

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ASTHENOPIA; COMPUTER; DRY EYE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SYNDROME;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ASTHENOPIA; COMPUTERS; DATA DISPLAY; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; SYNDROME;

EID: 80051648963     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00834.x     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. 2. Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year Olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Menlo Park, CA, 2010.
2. Thomson DW. Eye problems and visual display terminals-the facts and the fallacies. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 111-119.
3. Rossignol AM, Morse EP, Summers VM & Pagnotto LD. Visual display terminal use and reported health symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers. J Occup Med 1987; 29: 112-118.
4. Bhanderi DJ, Choudharg S & Doshi VG. A community-based study of asthenopia in computer operators. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008; 56: 51-55.
5. Mocci F, Serra A & Corrias GA. Psychological factors and visual fatigue in working with video display terminals. Occup Environ Med 2001; 58: 267-271.
6. Sanchez-Roman FR, Pererz-Lucio C, Juarez-Ruiz C, Velez-Zamora NM & Jimenez-Villarruel M. Risk factors for asthenopia among computer terminal operators. Salud Publica Mex 1996; 38: 189-196.
7. Dain SJ, McCarthy AK & Chan-Ling T. Symptoms in VDU operators. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 162-167.
8. Hayes JR, Sheedy JE, Stelmack JA & Heaney CA. Computer use, symptoms, and quality of life. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 738-744.
9. Rocha LE & Debert-Ribeiro M. Working conditions, visual fatigue and mental health among systems analysts in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61: 24-32.
10. Wiholm C, Richter H, Mathiassen SE & Toomingas A. Associations between eyestrain and neck-shoulder symptoms among call-center operators. SJWEH Suppl 2007; 3: 54-59.
11. Taino G, Ferrari M, Mestad IJ, Fabris F & Imbriani M. Asthenopia and work at video display terminals: study of 191 workers exposed to the risk by administration of a standardized questionnaire and ophthalmologic evaluation. G Ital med Lav Ergon 2006; 28: 487-497.
12. Iwakiri K, Mori I, Sotoyama M et al. Survey on visual and musculoskeletal symptoms in VDT workers. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi 2004; 46: 21-212.
13. Salibello C & Nilsen E. Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis. J Am Optom Assoc 1995; 66: 479-483.
14. Shima M, Nitta Y, Iwasaki A & Adachi M. Investigation of subjective symptoms among visual display terminal users and their affecting factors - analysis using log-linear models. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1993; 47: 1032-1040.
15. Sheedy JE, Hayes J & Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 732-739.
16. Sheedy JE, Bailey IL & Fong D. Editing performance-VDT vs. hard copy, black on white vs. white on black. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66 (Suppl): 118.
17. Wilkinson RT & Robinshaw HM. Proof reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue. Behav Inf Technol 1987; 6: 125-133.
18. Wright P & Lickorish A. Proofreading texts on screen and paper. Behav Inf Technol 1983; 2: 227-235.
19. Yang SN, Tai YC, Hayes JR, Doherty R, Corriveau P & Sheedy JE. Effects of font size and display quality on reading performance and visual discomfort of developmental readers. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E-abstract 105244.
20. Chu C, Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Benzoni JA & Collier JD. A comparison of symptoms after viewing text on a computer screen and paper. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 29-32.
21. Bohr PC. Efficacy of office ergonomics education. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10: 243-255.
22. Speklé EM, Heinrich J, Hoozemans MJM et al. The cost-effectiveness of the RSI QuickScan intervention programme for computer workers: results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 259-270.
23. Wahlstrom J. Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occup Med 2005; 55: 168-176.
24. Chindlea GG. About a healthy workstation. Annals of the Oradea University. Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, Vol VII (XVII), 2008:1998-2005.
25. Daum KM, Clore KA, Simms SS et al. Productivity associated with visual status of computer users. Optometry 2004; 75: 33-47.
26. Wiggins NP & Daum KM. Visual discomfort and astigmatic refractive errors in VDT use. J Am Optom Assoc 1991; 62: 680-684.
27. Wiggins NP, Daum KM & Snyder CA. Effects of residual astigmatism in contact lens wear on visual discomfort in VDT use. J Am Optom Assoc 1992; 63: 177-181.
28. Bilton N. I Live in the Future & Here's How It Works. Crown Business: New York, 2010.
29. Rosenfield M, Bababekova Y, Huang R & Hue J. Font size and viewing distance of hand-held smart phones. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E-abstract 105697.
30. DeMarco LM & Massof RW. Distribution of print sizes in U.S. newspapers. J Vis Impair Blind 1997; 91: 9-13.
31. Sheedy JE & Shaw-McMinn PG. Diagnosing and Treating Computer-Related Vision Problems. Butterworth Heinemann: Burlington, MA, 2003.
32. Bailey IL. Visual acuity. In: Borish's Clinical Refraction (Benjamin WJ, editor), 2nd edition, Butterworth Heinemann: St Louis, 2006; pp. 217-246.
33. Bennett ES. Contact lens correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2008; 91: 265-278.
34. Jones L & Dumbleton K. Contact lenses. In: Optometry: Science, Techniques and Clinical Management (Rosenfield M & Logan N, editors), Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier: Edinburgh, 2009; pp. 335-355.
35. Wolffsohn JS & Davies LN. Intraocular lenses in the 21st century. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 377-378.
36. Straker L, Jones KJ & Miller J. A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl Ergon 1997; 28: 263-268.
37. Harris C & Straker L. Survey of physical ergonomics issues associated with school childrens' use of laptop computers. Int J Ind Ergon 2000; 26: 337-347.
38. Yang SN, Tai YC, Hayes JR, Doherty R, Corriveau P & Sheedy JE. Effects of screen luminance and text contrast on reading performance and visual discomfort of developmental readers. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E-abstract 105247.
39. Birnbaum MH. Optometric Management of Nearpoint Vision Disorders. Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, 1993; pp. 121-160.
40. Sheedy JE & Parsons SD. The visual display terminal eye clinic: clinical report. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 622-626.
41. Wick B & Morse S. Accommodative accuracy to video display monitors. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79s: 218.
42. Penisten DK, Goss DA, Philpott G, Pham A & West RW. Comparisons of dynamic retinoscopy measurements with a print card, a video display terminal, and a PRIO system tester as test targets. Optometry 2004; 75: 231-240.
43. Collier JD & Rosenfield M. Accommodation and convergence during sustained computer work. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: E-abstract 060034.
44. Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH & Chase C. Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 625-633.
45. Rosenfield M, Gurevich R, Wickware E & Lay M. Computer vision syndrome: accommodative and vergence facility. J Behav Optom 2010; 21: 119-122.
46. Richter HO, Bänziger T, Abdi S & Forsman M. Stabilization of gaze: a relationship between ciliary muscle contraction and trapezius muscle activity. Vision Res 2010; 50: 2559-2569.
47. Lie I & Watten RG. Oculomotor factors in the aetiology of occupational cervicobrachial diseases (OCD). Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1987; 56: 151-156.
48. Wilkins AJ & Nimmo-Smith I. On the reduction of eye-strain when reading. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1984; 4: 53-59.
49. Wilkins A. What is visual discomfort? Trends Neurosci 1986; 9: 343-346.
50. Ciuffreda KJ, Scheiman M, Ong E, Rosenfield M & Solan HA. Irlen lenses do not improve accommodative accuracy at near. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 298-302.
51. Simmers AJ, Gray LS & Wilkins AJ. The influence of tinted lenses upon ocular accommodation. Vision Res 2001; 41: 1229-1238.
52. O'Connor PD, Sofo F, Kendall L & Olsen G. Reading disabilities and the effects of colored filters. J Learn Disabil 1990; 23: 597-603, 620.
53. Rosenfield M. Accommodation. In: The Ocular Examination. Measurement and Findings (Zadnik K editor), Saunders: Philadelphia, 1997; pp. 87-121.
54. Watten RG, Lie I & Birketvedt O. The influence of long-term visual near-work on accommodation and vergence: a field study. J Hum Ergol 1994; 23: 27-39.
55. Evans BJW. Binocular vision assessment. In: Optometry: Science, Techniques and Clinical Management (Rosenfield M & Logan N, editors), Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier: Edinburgh, 2009; pp. 245-246.
56. Nyman KG, Knave BG & Voss M. Work with video display terminals among office employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985; 11: 483-487.
57. Yeow PT & Taylor SP. Effects of short-term VDT usage on visual functions. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 459-466.
58. Yeow PT & Taylor SP. Effects of long-term visual display terminal usage on visual functions. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 930-941.
59. Jaschinski-Kruza W. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances of a visual display unit. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 27-34.
60. Jaschinski W. The proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 158-169.
61. Jenkins TCA, Pickwell LD & Yekta AA. Criteria for decompensation in binocular vision. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 121-125.
62. Pickwell LD, Kaye NA & Jenkins TCA. Distance and near readings of associated heterophoria taken on 500 patients. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991; 11: 291-296.
63. Karania R & Evans BJ. The Mallett fixation disparity test: influence of test instructions & relationship with symptoms. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 507-522.
64. Sheedy JE & Saladin JJ. Exophoria at near in presbyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975; 52: 474-481.
65. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1982-1998.
66. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A et al. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50: 253-262.
67. Tsubota K & Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 584-585.
68. Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L et al. Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 888-892.
69. Schlote T, Kadner G & Freudenthaler N. Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242: 306-312.
70. Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE & Hayes JR. Eyelid squint response to asthenopia-inducing conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 611-619.
71. Himebaugh NL, Begley CG, Bradley A & Wilkinson JA. Blinking and tear break-up during four visual tasks. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 106-114.
72. Jansen ME, Begley CG, Himebaugh NH & Port NL. Effect of contact lens wear and a near task on tear film break-up. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 350-357.
73. Sheedy JE, Gowrisankaran S & Hayes JR. Blink rate decreases with eyelid squint. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 905-911.
74. Acosta MC, Gallar J & Belmonte C. The influence of eye solutions on blinking and ocular comfort at rest and during work at video display terminals. Exp Eye Res 1999; 68: 663-669.
75. Harrison WW, Begley CG, Liu H, Chen M, Garcia M & Smith JA. Menisci and fullness of the blink in dry eye. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 706-714.
76. Abelson MB & Holly FJ. A tentative mechanism for inferior punctuate keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 83: 866-869.
77. Collins MJ, Iskander DR, Saunders A, Hook S, Anthony E & Gillon R. Blinking patterns and corneal staining. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32: 287-293.
78. Portello JK, Rosenfield M & Chu CA. Incomplete blinks and computer vision syndrome. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E-abstract 105993.
79. Chu CA, Rosenfield M & Portello JK. Computer vision syndrome: blink rate and dry eye during hard copy or computer viewing. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E-abstract 100698.
80. Portello JK & Rosenfield M. Effect of blink rate on computer vision syndrome. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E-abstract 95828.
81. Jainta S & Jaschinski W. Fixation disparity: binocular vergence accuracy for a visual display at different positions relative to the eyes. Hum Factors 2002; 44: 443-450.
82. Ripple PH. Variation of accommodation in vertical directions of gaze. Am J Ophthalmol 1952; 35: 1630-1634.
83. Takeda T, Neveu C & Stark L. Accommodation on downward gaze. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 556-561.
84. Shimmura S, Shimazaki J & Tsubota K. Results of a population-based questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye. Cornea 1999; 18: 408-411.
85. Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2009; 3: 405-412.
86. Xu L, You QS, Wang YX & Jonas JB. Associations between gender, ocular parameters and diseases: the Beijing eye study. Ophthal Res 2010; 45: 197-203.
87. Guillon M & Maïssa C. Tear film evaporation - effect of age and gender. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 171-175.
88. Maïssa C & Guillon M. Tear film dynamics and lipid layer characteristics - effect of age and gender. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 176-182.
89. Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE & Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 318-326.
90. Schaumberg DA, Dana MR, Buring JE & Sullivan DA. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians' Health Studies. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 763-768.
91. Moss SE, Klein R & Klein BEK. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1264-1268.
92. Moss SE, Klein R & Klein BEK. Long-term incidence of dry eye in an older population. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 668-674.
93. York M, Ong J & Robbins JC. Variation in blink rate associated with contact lens wear and task difficulty. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1971; 48: 461-467.
94. Pointer JS. Eyeblink activity with hydrophilic contact lenses. A concise longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol 1998; 66: 498-504.
95. Nichols JJ, Ziegler C, Mitchell GL & Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1911-1914.
96. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007; 5: 75-92.
97. Bayetto K & Logan RM. Sjögren's syndrome: a review of aetiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J 2010; 55 (Suppl 1): 39-47.
98. Henning RA, Jacques P, Kissel GV, Sullivan AB & Alteras-Webb SM. Frequent short rest breaks from computer work: effects on productivity and well-being at two field sites. Ergonomics 1997; 40: 78-91.
99. Shaw-McMinn PG. CVS: the practical and the clinical. Rev Optom 2001; 138: 78-88.