EchoBrush may be superior to standard eus-guided fna in the evaluation of cystic lesions of the pancreas

Cancer Cytopathology

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 209-214

  Lozano, Maria D ^a   Subtil, Jose C ^a   Miravalles, Tania Labiano ^a   Echeveste, Jose I ^a   Prieto, Cesar ^b   Betes, Maite ^b   Cienfuegos, F Javier Alvarez ^b   Idoate, Miguel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cystic pancreatic lesions; EchoBrush; EUS FNA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CYSTIC PANCREATIC LESION; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; PANCREAS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROUGH THE NEEDLE CYTOLOGIC BRUSH SYSTEM; AGED; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 80051618725     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19346638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20133     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hutchins G, Draganov PV. Diagnostic evaluation of pancreatic cystic malignancies. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90: 399-410.
2. Cao HS, Kellogg B, Lowy AM, Bouvet M. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19: 267-295.
3. Kinney T. Evidence-based imaging of pancreatic malignancies. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:235-249.
4. Hutchins GF, Draganov PV. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: A diagnostic challenge. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15: 48-54.
5. Verbesey JE, Munson JL. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:411-425.
6. Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound techniques for pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12:709-718.
7. Sedlack R, Affi A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton ID, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ. Utility of EUS in the evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:543-547.
8. van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: A pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:383-389.
9. Sawhney MS, Devarajan S, O'Farrel P, et al. Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen and molecular analysis in pancreatic cyst fluid. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1106-1110.
10. Al-Haddad M, Raimondo M, Woodward T, et al. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard FNA in evaluating cystic lesions of the pancreas: A pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:894-898.
11. Bruno M, Bosco M, Carucci P, et al. Preliminary experience with a new cytology brush in EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1220-1224.
12. Al-Haddad M, Gill KRS, Raimondo M, et al. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard fine-needle aspiration in evaluating cystic pancreatic lesions: A controlled study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:127-132.
13. Thomas T, Bebb J, Mannath J, Ragunath K, Kaye PV, Aithal GP. EUS-guided pancreatic cyst brushing: A comparative study in a tertiary referral centre. JOP. 2010;11:163-169.
14. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:791-798.
15. Linder JD, Geenen JE, Catalano MF. Cyst fluid analysis obtained by EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of discrete cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: A prospective single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:697-702.
16. Attasaranya S, Pais S, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Sherman S, De Witt JM. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and cyst fluid analysis for pancreatic cysts. JOP. 2007;8:553-563.
17. Khalid A, Zahid M, Finkelstein SD, et al. Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: A report of the PANDA study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1095-1102.