Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard fine-needle aspiration in evaluating cystic pancreatic lesions: A controlled study

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 127-132

  Al Haddad, M ^a,b   Gill, K R S ^c   Raimondo, M ^c   Woodward, T A ^c   Krishna, M ^c   Crook, J E ^c   Skarvinko, L N ^c   Jamil, L H ^c   Hasan, M ^c   Wallace, M B ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Clarian/IU Digestive Diseases Center   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MUCIN;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC PANCREATIC LESION; CYTOLOGY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DYSPLASIA; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EPITHELIUM; ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTRODUODENAL ARTERY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC CYST; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 76349113375     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215351     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brugge W R., Lauwers G Y., Sahani D, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2004 351 1218-1226
2. Warshaw A L., Rutledge P L. Cystic tumors mistaken for pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann Surg 1987 205 393-398
3. Brugge W R., Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004 126 1330-1336
4. Al-Haddad M, Raimondo M, Woodward T, et al. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard FNA in evaluating cystic lesions of the pancreas: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 894-898
5. Brugge W R. The incidental pancreatic cyst on abdominal computerized tomography imaging: diagnosis and management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 6 140-144
6. Brandwein S L., Farrell J J., Centeno B A., Brugge W R. Detection and tumor staging of malignancy in cystic, intraductal, and solid tumors of the pancreas by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 53 722-727
7. Frossard J L., Amouyal P, Amouyal G, et al. Performance of endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 1516-1524
8. Sedlack R, Affi A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, et al. Utility of EUS in the evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 543-547
9. Pais S A., Attasaranya S, Leblanc J K., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: correlation with surgical histopathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 5 489-495
10. Emerson R E., Randolph M L., Cramer H M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is highly predictive of pancreatic neoplasia. Diagn Cytopathol 2006 34 457-462
11. Recine M, Kaw M, Evans D B., Krishnamurthy S. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Cancer 2004 102 92-99
12. Lai R, Stanley M W., Bardales R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002 34 715-720
13. O'Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R, et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 53 470-474
14. Lee L S., Saltzman J R., Bounds B C., et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 3 231-236
15. Al-Haddad M, Wallace M B., Woodward T A., et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2008 40 204-208
16. Kawamoto S, Lawler L P., Horton K M., et al. MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 687-695
17. Kubo H, Chijiiwa Y, Akahoshi K, et al. Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 1429-1434
18. Schmidt C M., White P B., Waters J A., et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology. Ann Surg 2007 246 644-651; discussion 651644
19. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006 6 17-32