Accommodative amplitude required for sustained near work

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 480-486

  Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Sheppard, Amy L ^a   Vakani, Sanjay ^a   Davies, Leon N ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodating intraocular lenses; Accommodation; Eye focus; Presbyopia; Restoration

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; ASTHENOPIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESBYOPIA; READING; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGING; ASTHENOPIA; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRESBYOPIA; READING; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051610904     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00847.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16: 8-26.
2. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2008; 91: 279-295.
3. Sheppard AL, Bashir A, Wolffsohn JS & Davies LN. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 441-452.
4. Ben-Nun J & Alió JL. Feasibility and development of a high-power real accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1802-1808.
5. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 812-825.
6. Sanders DR & Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1679-1684.
7. Koopmans SA, Terwee TT, Barkhof J, Haitjema HJ & Kooijman AC. Polymer refilling of presbyopic human lenses in vitro restores the ability to undergo accommodative changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 250-257.
8. Koopmans SA, Terwee T, Glasser A et al. Accommodative lens refilling in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2976-2984.
9. Myers RI & Krueger RR. Novel approaches to correction of presbyopia with laser modification of the crystalline lens. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 136-139.
10. Krueger RR, Sun XK, Stroh J & Myers R. Experimental increase in accommodative potential after neodymium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser photodisruption of paired cadaver lenses. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2122-2129.
11. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 12-18.
12. Schachar RA. Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol 1992; 24: 445-452.
13. Hermans EA, Terwee TT, Koopmans SA, Dubbelman M, van der Heijde RGL & Heethaar RM. Development of a ciliary muscle-driven accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 2133-2138.
14. Cleary G, Spalton DJ & Gala KB. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 150: 619-627.
15. Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, Jayaram H & Marshall J. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1098-1103.
16. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Naroo SA et al. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1230-1235.
17. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative'' intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 693-696.
18. Landolt E. The Refraction and Accommodation of the Eye and their Anomalies (translated by Culver CM & Young J). Pentland: Edinburgh, 1886; pp. 338-341.
19. Bennett AG & Francis JL. Visual Optics. In: The Eye (Davson H, editor), Vol. 4. Academic Press: New York, USA, 1962; pp. 154.
20. Abrams D. Duke-Elder's Practice of Refraction. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, 1978; pp. 484-485.
21. Giles GH. The Principles and Practice of Refraction. Hammond and Hammond Co: London, 1960.
22. Millodot M & Millodot S. Presbyopia correction and the accommodation in reserve. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 126-132.
23. O'Leary CI & Evans BJW. Criteria for prescribing optometric interventions: literature review and practitioner survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 429-439.
24. Vilupuru AS, Kasthurirangan S & Glasser A. Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans. Vision Res 2005; 45: 181-191.
25. Duane A. Studies in monocular and binocular accommodation with their clinical applications. Am J Ophthalmol 1922; 5: 865-877.
26. Turner MJ. Observations on the normal subjective amplitude of accommodation. Br J Physiol Opt 1958; 15: 70-100.
27. Rosenfield M & Cohen AS. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 247-249.
28. Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Gupta N et al. Mechanism of action of the tetraflex accommodative intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 858-862.
29. Ostrin LA & Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1435-1444.
30. Wang B & Ciuffreda KJ. Depth-of-focus of the human eye: theory and clinical implications. Surv Ophthalmol 2006; 51: 75-85.
31. Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B & Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 101-107.
32. Ayrshire Study Circle. An investigation into accommodation. Br J Physiol Opt 1964; 21: 31-35.
33. Atchison DA, Charman WN & Woods RL. Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 511-520.
34. Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ & Gilmartin B. Sympathetic inhibition of accommodation after sustained nearwork in subjects with myopic and emmetropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 114-120.
35. Donders FC. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye. The Sydenham Society: London, UK, 1864.
36. Watten RG. Reinvention of visual fatigue: accumulation of scientific knowledge or neglect of scientific history? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 428-432.
37. Berens C & Sells SB. Experimental studies on fatigue of accommodation. Arch Ophthalmol 1944; 31: 148-159.
38. Vedamurthy I, Harrison WW, Liu Y, Cox I & Schor CM. The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 4215-4222.
39. Gupta N, Naroo SA & Wolffsohn JS. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 98-105.
40. Timmis MA, Johnson L, Elliott DB & Buckley JG. Use of single-vision distance spectacles improves landing control during step descent in well-adapted multifocal lens-wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3903-3908.
41. Hrynchak P. Prescribing spectacles: reasons for failure of spectacle lens acceptance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 111-115.
42. Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S & Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1878-1888.
43. Huber C. Myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Dev Ophthalmol 1981; 5: 17-26.
44. Verzella F & Calossi A. Mulitifocal effect of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9: 58-61.
45. Nanavaty MA, Vasavada AR, Patel AS, Raj SM & Desai TH. Analysis of patients with good uncorrected distance and near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1091-1097.
46. Trindade F, Oliveira A & Frasson M. Benefit of ATR astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 82-85.