Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2009, Pages E98-E105

  Gupta, Navneet ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Monovision; Multifocal contact lenses; Presbyopia; Vision evaluation

Indexed keywords

A-CENTER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTION; MONOVISION; MULTIFOCAL; MULTIFOCAL CONTACT LENSES; PRESBYOPIA; PRINT SIZE; READING SPEED; REAL-WORLD; SINGLE VISION; SINGLE-VISION LENS; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL COMPARISON; VISUAL FUNCTIONS;

CONTACT LENSES; FUNCTION EVALUATION;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRESBYOPIA; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 67650337395     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: 15389235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194eb18     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996-2005). Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:59-68.
2. Jain S, Arora I, Azar DT. Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;40:491-9.
3. Evans BJ. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:417-39.
4. McDonnell PJ, Lee P, Spritzer K, Lindblad AS, Hays RD. Associations of presbyopia with vision-targeted health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1577-81.
5. Westin E, Wick B, Harrist RB. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates. Optometry 2000;71:757-63.
6. Robboy MW, Cox IG, Erickson P. Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity. CLAO J 1990;16:299-301.
7. Sheedy JE, Harris MG, Gan CM. Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses? Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:482-6.
8. Ginsburg AP. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:403-7.
9. Mansfield JS, Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Leubeker A. A new reading acuity chart for normal and low vision. In: Ophthalmic Visual Optics/Non-Invasive Assessment of the Visual System. OSA Technical Digest, vol 3. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America; 1993:232-5.
10. Rumney N. MNRead: a new LV reading chart. Optom Today 1998;38:50-2.
11. Gupta N, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Is randomisation necessary for measuring defocus curves in pre-presbyopes? Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:119-24.
12. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:412-20.
13. Raasch TW, Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:342-8.
14. Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Gibson GA, Shah S. Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:134-43.
15. Situ P, Du Toit R, Fonn D, Simpson T. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:181-4.
16. Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Monovision vs. aspheric bifocal contact lenses: a crossover study. J Am Optom Assoc 1987;58:652-4.
17. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:723-30.
18. Borish IM, Soni S. Bifocal contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1982;53:219-29.
19. Back A, Grant T, Hine N. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:474-80.
20. Cagnolati W. Acceptance of different multifocal contact lenses depending on the binocular findings. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:315-22.
21. Harris MG, Sheedy JE, Bronge MR, Joe SM, Mook MA. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1991;62:389-93.
22. McGill E, Ames K, Erickson P, Robboy M. Quality of vision with hydrogel simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1987;14:476-82.
23. Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:266-73.
24. Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ. Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989;9:133-8.
25. Loshin DS, Loshin MS. Binocular summation with monovision contact lens correction for presbyopia. Int Contact Lens Clin 1982;9:161-5.
26. Erickson P, Schor C. Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:22-8.
27. Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakhsminarayanan V. Contrast sensitivity with presbyopic contact lenses. J Mod Optic 2007;54:1325-32.
28. Van Meter WS, Gussler JR, Litteral G. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses. CLAO J 1990;16:203-7.
29. Zandvoort SW, Kok JH, Molenaar H. Good subjective presbyopic correction with newly designed aspheric multifocal contact lens. Int Ophthalmol 1993;17:305-11.
30. Sergienko NM, Tutchenko NN. Depth of focus: clinical manifestation. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:836-40.
31. Legge GE, Mullen KT, Woo GC, Campbell FW. Tolerance to visual defocus. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1987;4:851-63.
32. Schor C, Erickson P. Patterns of binocular suppression and accommodation in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:853-61.
33. Erickson P. Potential range of clear vision in monovision. J Am Optom Assoc 1988;59:203-5.
34. Goodwin RT, Romano PE. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:917-23.
35. McGill E, Erickson P. Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:619-26.
36. Sheedy JE, Harris MG, Bronge MR, Joe SM, Mook MA. Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:537-41.
37. Hutnik CM, O'Hagan D. Multifocal contact lenses—look again! Can J Ophthalmol 1997;32:201-5.
38. Garnham L, Sloper JJ. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:91-5.
39. Bullimore MA, Jacobs RJ. Subjective and objective assessment of soft bifocal contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:469-75.
40. Brenner MB. An objective and subjective comparative analysis of diffractive and front surface aspheric contact lens designs used to correct presbyopia. CLAO J 1994;20:19-22.