Coevolutionary hotspots and coldspots for host sex and parasite local adaptation in a snail-trematode interaction

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1335-1340

  King, Kayla C ^a   Delph, Lynda F ^a   Jokela, Jukka ^b,c   Lively, Curtis M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; DEEP WATER; FLATWORM; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; LOCAL ADAPTATION; RED QUEEN HYPOTHESIS; SHALLOW WATER; SNAIL;

NEW ZEALAND;

GASTROPODA; MICROPHALLUS (TREMATODE); POTAMOPYRGUS ANTIPODARUM; TREMATODA;

EID: 80051595139     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19241.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bell G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of asexuality. - Univ. of California Press.
2. Ben-Ami F. et al. 2008. A quantitative test of the relationship between parasite dose and infection probability across different host-parasite combinations. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 853-859.
3. Ben-Ami F. et al. 2010. Pathogen dose infectivity curves as a method to analyze the distribution of host susceptibility: a quantitative assessment of maternal effects after food stress and pathogen exposure. Am. Nat. 175: 106-115.
4. Carius H. J. et al. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55: 1136-1145.
5. Dybdahl M. F. and Lively C. M. 1995. Diverse, endemic and polyphyletic clones in mixed populations of a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). J. Evol. Biol. 8: 385-389.
6. Dybdahl M. F. and Lively C. M. 1996. The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50: 2264-2275.
7. Dybdahl M. F. et al. 2008. Hybrid fitness in a locally adapted parasite. Am. Nat. 172: 772-782.
8. Forde S. E. et al. 2004. Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction. Nature 431: 841-844.
9. Fox J. A. et al. 1996. Genetic structure of coexisting sexual and clonal subpopulations in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Evolution 50: 1541-1548.
10. Gandon S. and Nuismer S. L. 2009. Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. Am. Nat. 173: 212-224.
11. Gandon S. et al. 2008. Host-parasite coevolution and patterns of adaptation across time and space. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1861-1866.
12. Haldane J. B. S. 1949. Disease and evolution. La ricerca Scientifica 19: 68-76.
13. Hamilton W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35: 282-290.
14. Jaenike J. 1978. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theory 3: 191-194.
15. Jokela J. and Lively C. M. 1995. Spatial variation in infection by digenetic trematodes in a population of freshwater snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia 103: 509-517.
16. Jokela J. et al. 1999. Habitat-specific variation in life-history traits, clonal population structure, and parasitism in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). J. Evol. Biol. 12: 350-360.
17. Jokela J. et al. 2009. The maintenance of sex, clonal dynamics, and host-parasite coevolution in a mixed population of sexual and asexual snails. Am. Nat. 174: S43-S53.
18. King K. C. et al. 2009. The geographic mosaic of sex and the Red Queen. Curr. Biol. 19: 1438-1441.
19. Koskella B. and Lively C. M. 2009. Evidence for negative frequency-dependent selection during experimental coevolution of a freshwater snail and a sterilizing trematode. Evolution 63: 2213-2221.
20. Laine A. L. 2006. Evolution of host resistance: looking for coevolutionary hotspots at small spatial scales. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 267-273.
21. Lively C. M. 1987. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 328: 519-521.
22. Lively C. M. and Jokela J. 1996. Clinal variation for local adaptation in a host-parasite interaction. Proc. R. Soc. B 263: 891-897.
23. Lively C. M. and Dybdahl M. F. 2000. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405: 679-681.
24. Nash D. R. et al. 2008. A mosaic of chemical coevolution in a large blue butterfly. Science 319: 88-90.
25. Nuismer S. L. 2006. Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60: 24-30.
26. Nuismer S. L. et al. 2003. Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1337-1345.
27. Osnas E. E. and Lively C. M. 2004. Parasite dose, prevalence of infection and local adaptation in a host-parasite system. Parasitology 128: 223-228.
28. Osnas E. E. and Lively C. M. 2011. Using final host faeces to infect experimental intermediate host populations: waterfowl hosts for New Zealand trematodes. N. Z. J. Zool. 38: 83-90.
29. Schmid-Hempel P. 2009. Immune defence, parasite evasion strategies and their relevance for 'macroscopic phenomena' such as virulence. Proc. R. Soc. B 364: 85-98.
30. Thompson J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
31. Thompson J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
32. Thompson J. N. and Cunningham B. M. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417: 735-738.
33. Van Valen L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1: 1-30.
34. Vaugh K. J. and Young T. P. 2010. Contingent conclusions: year of initiation influences ecological field experiments, but temporal replication is rare. Restor. Ecol. 18: 59-64.