Hybrid fitness in a locally adapted parasite

American Naturalist

Volumn 172, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 772-782

  Dybdahl, Mark F ^a   Jokela, Jukka ^b,c   Delph, Lynda F ^d   Koskella, Britt ^d   Lively, Curtis M ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Epistasis; Host parasite interactions; Hybrid fitness; Red Queen hypothesis; Sexual reproduction

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; GENE; HOST-PARASITOID INTERACTION; PARASITE; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

ADAPTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HYBRIDIZATION; NEW ZEALAND; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SNAIL; TREMATODE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; NEW ZEALAND; SNAILS; TREMATODA;

GASTROPODA; TREMATODA;

EID: 56649124748     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/592866     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and C. M. Lively. 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-allele models and all points in between. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:79-90.
2. -. 2003. Modeling infection genetics as a two-step process combining gene-for-gene and matching-allele genetics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:323-334.
3. Carius, H.-J., T. J. Little, and D. Ebert. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1136-1145.
4. Criscione, C. D., and M. S. Blouin. 2006. Minimal selfing, few clones, and no among-host genetic structure in a hermaphroditic parasite with asexual larval propagation. Evolution 60:553-562.
5. Dybdahl, M. F., and A. C. Krist. 2004. Genotypic vs. condition effects on parasite-driven rare advantage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:967-973.
6. Dybdahl, M. F., and C. M. Lively. 1995. Diverse, endemic and polyphyletic clones in mixed populations of a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:385-389.
7. -. 1996. The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50:2264-2275.
8. -. 1998. Host-parasite coevolution: evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52:1057-1066.
9. Dybdahl, M. F., and A. Storfer. 2003. Parasite local adaptation: Red Queen versus Suicide King. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:523-530.
10. Fritz, R. S., C. Moulia, and G. Newcombe. 1999. Resistance of hybrid plants and animals to herbivores, pathogens, and parasites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:565-591.
11. Fritz, R. S., C. G. Hochwender, S. J. Brunsfeld, and B. M. Roche. 2003. Genetic architecture of susceptibility to herbivores in hybrid willows. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:1115-1126.
12. Gandon, S., Y. Capowiez, Y. Dubois, Y. Michalakis, and I. Olivieri. 1996. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a meta-population model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1003-1009.
13. Gavrilets, S. 1997. Coevolutionary chase in exploiter-victim systems with polygenic characters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 186:527-534.
14. Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282-290.
15. Hatfield, T., and D. Schluter. 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53:866-873.
16. Hines, R. J., W. G. Hines, and B. W. Robinson. 2004. A new statistical test of fitness set data from reciprocal transplant experiments involving intermediate phenotypes. American Naturalist 163:97-104.
17. Howard, R. S., and C. M. Lively. 1994. Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature 367:554-557.
18. Jaenike, J. 1978. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evolutionary Theory 3:191-194.
19. Jokela, J., and C. M. Lively. 1995. Spatial variation for infection by digenetic trematodes in a population of freshwater snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia (Berlin) 103:509-517.
20. Lambrechts, L., S. Fellous, and J. C. Koella. 2006. Coevolutionary interactions between host and parasite genotypes. Trends in Parasitology 22:12-16.
21. Lively, C. M. 1987. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 328:519-521.
22. -. 1989. Adaptation by a parasitic trematode to local populations of its snail host. Evolution 43:1663-1671.
23. -. 1992. Parthenogenesis in a freshwater snail: reproductive assurance versus parasitic release. Evolution 46:907-913.
24. -. 1999. Migration, virulence, and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S34-S47.
25. Lively, C. M., and M. F. Dybdahl. 2000. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405:679-681.
26. Lively, C. M., and J. Jokela. 2002. Temporal and spatial distributions of parasites and sex in a freshwater snail. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:219-226.
27. Lively, C. M., M. F. Dybdahl, J. Jokela, E. E. Osnas, and L. F. Delph. 2004. Host sex and local adaptation by parasites in a snail-trematode interaction. American Naturalist 164(suppl.):S6-S18.
28. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
29. Nuismer, S. L. 2006. Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60:83-88.
30. Nuismer, S. L., and S. Gandon. 2008. Moving beyond common garden and transplant designs: insight into the causes of local adaptation in species interactions. American Naturalist 171:658-668.
31. Nuismer, S. L., and S. P. Otto. 2004. Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101:11036-11039.
32. Osnas, E. E., and C. M. Lively. 2004. Parasite dose, prevalence of infection and local adaptation in a host-parasite system. Parasitology 128:223-228.
33. Otto, S. P., and Y. Michalakis. 1998. The evolution of recombination in changing environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:145-151.
34. Otto, S. P., and S. L. Nuismer. 2004. Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 304:1018-1020.
35. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively. 1999. The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154:393-405.
36. -. 2007. Short- and long-term benefits and detriments to recombination under antagonistic coevolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1206-1217.
37. Ridenhour, B. J., and S. L. Nuismer. 2007. Polygenic traits and parasite local adaptation. Evolution 61:368-376.