Imaging features of chondrosarcoma

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 504-511

  Soldatos, Theodoros ^a   McCarthy, Edward F ^a   Attar, Samer ^b   Carrino, John A ^a   Fayad, Laura M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chondrosarcoma; imaging features

Indexed keywords

CHONDROSARCOMA; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HIGH GRADES; IMAGE-GUIDED; IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS; IMAGING FEATURES; LOW GRADE; MULTIPLE IMAGING MODALITY; MULTIPLE MODALITIES; PERFORMANCE;

TUMORS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; ETIDRONIC ACID TC 99M; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GADOLINIUM; PENTAVALENT DIMERCAPTOSUCCINIC; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; THALLIUM 201; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CHONDROSARCOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENCHONDROMA; HUMAN; JOINT RADIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OSTEOCHONDROMA; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 80051531735     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31822048ff     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Kunisada T, Miyazaki M, Mihara K, et al. A new human chondrosarcoma cell line (OUMS-27) that maintains chondrocytic differentiation. IntJCancer. 1998;77:854-859. (Pubitemid 28378133)
2. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients. EurJRadiol. 1995;21:34-40.
3. Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ, et al. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging ofprimary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23:1245.
4. Meyers SP. Chondrosarcomas. In: Meyers SP, ed. MRIofBone and Soft Tissue Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2007:368-377.
5. Murray JRD, Holmes EJ, Misra RR, eds. A-Z of Musculoskeletal and Trauma Radiology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
6. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Hogendoorn PCW. Chondrosarcoma. In: Fletcher CD, Unni KK, Mertens F, eds. Pathology and Genetics ofTumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002:247-257.
7. Varma DG, Ayala AG, Carrasco CH, et al. Chondrosarcoma: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1992;12:687-704.
8. Bredella MA, Stoller DW, Johnston JO. Bone and soft-tissue tumors. In: Stoller DW, ed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007.
9. McCarthy EF, Tyler WK. Distinguishing enchondromas from central low-grade chondrosarcoma. Path CaseRev. 2001;6:8-13. (Pubitemid 33807066)
10. Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi JY, et al. Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;12:3008-3014.
11. Unni KK. Dahlin's Bone Tumors: GeneralAspects andData on 11,087 Cases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
12. Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, et al. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics. 1998;18:1213-1237;quiz 1244-1245. (Pubitemid 128466884)
13. Marco RA, Gitelis S, Brebach GT, et al. Cartilage tumors: evaluation and treatment. JAm Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:292-304.
14. Resnik D, Kyriakos M, Greenaway GD. Tumors and tumor-like lesions ofbone: imaging and pathology ofspecific lesions. In: Diagnosis of Bone andJointDisorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2002:3897-3919.
15. Wang XL, De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, et al. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management. EurRadiol. 2001;11:1054-1057. (Pubitemid 32755573)
16. Saki N, Akhlagh SN, Mostofi NE, et al. Chondrosarcoma of the hyoid bone: imaging, surgical, and histopathologic correlation. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1211-1213.
17. Riedel RF, Larrier N, Dodd L, et al. The clinical management of chondrosarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2009;10:94-106.
18. Rozeman LB, Hogendoorn PC, Bovée JV Diagnosisand prognosis of chondrosarcoma ofbone. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002;2:461-472. (Pubitemid 35014420)
19. Fiorenza F, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, et al. Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma ofbone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:93-99. (Pubitemid 34105631)
20. Crim JR, Seeger LL. Diagnosis of low-grade chondrosarcoma. Radiology. 1993;189:503-504. (Pubitemid 23321434)
21. Sanerkin NG. The diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma ofbone: a combined cytologic andhistologic approach. Cancer. 1980;45: 582-594. (Pubitemid 10169308)
22. Mirra JM, Gold R, Downs J, et al. A new histologic approach to the differentiation of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of the bones. A clinicopathologic analysis of51 cases. Clin OrthopRelatRes. 1985;201:214-237. (Pubitemid 16101882)
23. Choong PF, Kunisada T, Slavin J, et al. The role ofthallium-201 and pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid for staging cartilaginous tumours. IntSemin Surg Oncol. 2004;1:10.
24. Chaabane S, Bouaziz MC, Drissi C, et al. Periosteal chondrosarcoma. AJRAm J Roentgenol. 2009;192:W1-W6.
25. Littrell LA, Wenger DE, Wold LE, et al. Radiographic, CT, and MR imaging features ofdedifferentiated chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 174 de novo cases. Radiographics. 2004;24:1397-1409. (Pubitemid 39329384)
26. Campanacci M. Clear cell chondrosarcoma. In: Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1999:369.
27. Collins MS, Koyama T, Swee RG, et al. Clear cell chondrosarcoma: radiographic, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance findings in 34 patients with pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2003; 32:687-694. (Pubitemid 37527083)
28. Shapeero LG, Vanel D, Couanet D, et al. Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Radiology. 1993;186:819-826. (Pubitemid 23073528)
29. Rosenthal DI, Schiller AL, Mankin HJ. Chondrosarcoma: correlation of radiological andhistological grade. Radiology. 1984;150:21-26. (Pubitemid 14212270)
30. Anderson SE, Steinbach LS, Schlicht S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging ofbone tumors andjoints. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;18:457-465. (Pubitemid 351315548)
31. Helms CA, Major NM, Anderson MW, et al, eds. Tumors. In: Musculoskeletal MRI. 2nded. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier 2009.
32. Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, et al. Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;214:539-546. (Pubitemid 30077716)
33. Fayad LM, Bluemke DA, McCarthy EF, et al. Musculoskeletal tumors: use of proton MR spectroscopic imaging for characterization. JMagn ResonImaging. 2006;23:23-28. (Pubitemid 43100714)
34. Young GS. Advanced MRI of adult brain tumors. Neurol Clin. 2007;25:947-973, viii. (Pubitemid 47600577)
35. Hayashida Y, Hirai T, Yakushiji T, et al. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis ofpoorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolongedbone masses: Initial experience. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:377-382. (Pubitemid 43364065)
36. Yakushiji T, Oka K, Sato H, et al. Characterization ofchondroblastic osteosarcoma: gadolinium-enhanced versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:895-900.
37. Brenner W, Conrad EU, Eary JF FDG PET imaging for grading and prediction of outcome in chondrosarcomapatients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:189-195. (Pubitemid 38173693)
38. FeldmanF,VanHeertumR, SaxenaC, etal. FDG-PETapplications for cartilage neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:367-374.
39. Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, et al. FDG-PET in differential diagnosis and grading ofchondrosarcomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23:603-608. (Pubitemid 29337158)
40. Lee FY, Yu J, Chang SS, et al. Diagnostic value and limitations of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for cartilaginoustumors ofbone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2677-2685. (Pubitemid 39628370)
41. Ahmed AR, Tan TS, Unni KK, et al. Secondary chondrosarcoma in osteochondroma: report of 107 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:93-206.
42. Bernard SA, Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, et al. Improved differentiation of benign osteochondromas from secondary chondrosarcomas with standardized measurement ofcartilage cap at CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;255:857-865.
43. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, et al. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2000;20:1407-1434.
44. Altay M, Bayrakci K, Yildiz Y, et al. Secondary chondrosarcoma in cartilage bone tumors: report of 32 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:415-423. (Pubitemid 47515371)
45. Malghem J, Vande Berg B, Noël H, et al. Benign osteochondromas and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation ofcartilage cap thickness by ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol. 1992;21:33-37.