Simple life-history omnivory: Responses to enrichment and harvesting in systems with intraguild predation

American Naturalist

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 305-319

  Abrams, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alternative states; Enrichment; Intraguild predation; Omnivory; Ontogenetic niche shift; Stability

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ADULT; BOTTOM-UP CONTROL; FOOD WEB; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; MATURATION; NICHE PARTITIONING; OMNIVORY; ONTOGENY; PREY CAPTURE; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; RESOURCE USE; SUCCESSION; TOP-DOWN CONTROL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 80051519000     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/661243     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1994. Evolutionarily stable growth rates in size-structured populations under size-specific competition. Theoretical Population Biology 46:78-94.
2. Abrams, P. A., and S. R. Fung. 2010a. The impact of adaptive defense on top down and bottom up effects in systems with intraguild predation. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 12:307-325.
3. Abrams, P. A., 2010b. Prey persistence and abundance in systems with intraguild predation and type-2 functional responses. Journal of Theoretical Biology 264:1033-1042.
4. Abrams, P. A., and L. R. Ginzburg. 2000. Models of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:337-341.
5. Abrams, P. A., and C. Quince. 2005. The impact of mortality on predator population size and stability in systems with size-structured prey. Theoretical Population Biology 68:253-266.
6. Abrams, P. A., O. Leimar, S. Nylin, and C. Wiklund. 1996. The effect of flexible growth rates on optimal sizes and development times. American Naturalist 147:381-395.
7. Amarasekare, P. 2007. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation. Ecology 88: 2720-2728.
8. Amarasekare, P. 2008. Coexistence of intraguild predators and prey in resource-rich environments. Ecology 89: 2786-2797.
9. Briggs, C. J. 1993. Competition among parasitoid species on a stagestructured host, and its effect on host suppression. American Naturalist 141:372-397.
10. Browne, D. R., and J. B. Rasmussen. 2009. Shifts in the trophic ecology of brook trout resulting from interactions with yellow perch: an intraguild predator-prey system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:1109-1122.
11. Denno, R., and R. Fagan. 2003. Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods? Ecology 84:2522-2531.
12. De Roos, A. M., T. Schellekens, T. van Kooten, K. van de Wolfshaar, D. Claessen, and L. Persson. 2007. Food dependent growth leads to overcompensation in stage-specific biomass when mortality increases: the influence of maturation versus reproduction limitation. American Naturalist 170:E59-E76.
13. Diehl, S. 2003. The evolution and maintenance of omnivory: dynamic constraints and the role of food quality. Ecology 84:2557-2567.
14. Diehl, S., and M. Feissel. 2000. Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. American Naturalist 155:200-218.
15. Guill, C. 2009. Alternative dynamical states in stage-structured consumer populations. Theoretical Population Biology 76:158-168.
16. Hart, D. R. 2002. Intraguild predation, invertebrate predators and trophic cascades in lake food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 218:111-128.
17. HilleRisLambers, R., J. van de Koppel, and P. M. J. Herman. 2006. Persistence despite omnivory: benthic communities and the discrepancy between theory and observation. Oikos 113:23-32.
18. Holt, R. D. 1983. Immigration and the dynamics of peripheral pop ulations. Pages 680-694 in A. G. J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, eds. Advances in herpetology and evolutionary biology. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
19. Holt, R. D., and G. R. Huxel. 2007. Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives. Ecology 88:2706-2712.
20. Holt, R. D., and G. A. Polis. 1997. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. American Naturalist 149:745-764.
21. Hutchings, J. A. 2001. Influence of population decline, fishing, and spawner variability on the recovery of marine fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 59(suppl. A):306-322.
22. Hutchings, J. A., and J. D. Reynolds. 2004. Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. Bio-Science 13:297-309.
23. Křivan, V., and S. Diehl. 2005. Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theoretical Population Biology 67:85-99.
24. Leon, J. A., and D. Tumpson. 1975. Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. Journal of Theoretical Biology 50:185-201.
25. McNair, J. N. 1995. Ontogenetic patterns of density-dependent mortality: contrasting stability effects in populations with adult dominance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 175:207-230.
26. Murdoch, W. W., C. J. Briggs, and R. M. Nisbet. 2003. Consumerresource dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Mylius, S. D., K. Klumpers, A. M. de Roos, and L. Persson. 2001.
27. Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. American Naturalist 158: 259-276.
28. Namba, T., K. Tanabe, and N. Maeda. 2008. Omnivory and stability of food webs. Ecological Complexity 5:73-85.
29. Olson M. H., G. G. Mittelbach, and C. W. Osenberg. 1995. Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology 76:1758-1771.
30. Persson, L., and A. M. De Roos. 2006. Food-dependent individual growth and population dynamics in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 69(suppl. C):1-20.
31. Persson, L., and L. A. Greenberg. 1990. Juvenile competitive bottlenecks and perch (Perca fluviatilis)-roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71:44-56.
32. Pimm, S. L., and J. C. Rice. 1987. The dynamics of multi-species, multi-life-stage models of aquatic food webs. Theoretical Population Biology 32:303-325.
33. Pine, W. E., S. J. D. Martell, C. J. Walters, and J. F. Kitchell. 2009. Counterintuitive responses of fish populations to management actions: some common causes and implications for predictions based on ecosystem modeling. Fisheries 34:165-180.
34. Post, J. R., M. Sullivan, S. Cox, N. P. Lester, C. J. Walters, E. A. Parkinson, A. J. Paul, L. Jackson, and B. J. Shuter. 2002. Canada's recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse? Fisheries 27:6-17.
35. Roff, D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York.
36. Rosenheim, J. A., U. Alon, and G. Shinar. 2010. Evolutionary balancing of fitness-limiting factors. American Naturalist 172:662-674.
37. Rudolf, V. H.W. 2007. The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 88:2697-2705.
38. Schreiber, S., and V. H.W. Rudolf. 2008. Crossing habitat boundaries: coupling dynamics of ecosystems through complex life cycles. Ecology Letters 11:576-587.
39. Schröder, A., K. A. Nilsson, L. Persson, T. van Kooten, and B. Reichstein. 2009. Invasion success depends on invader body size in a size-structured mixed predation-competition community. Journal of Animal Ecology 78:1152-1162.
40. Sherwood, G. D., I. Pazzia, A. Moeser, A. Hontela, and J. B. Rasmussen. 2002. Shifting gears: enzymatic evidence for the energetic advantage of switching diet in wild-living fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 59:229-241.
41. Takimoto, G., T. Miki, and M. Kigami. 2007. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient. Theoretical Population Biology 72:264-273.
42. Thompson, R. M., M. Hemberg, B. M. Starzomski, and J. B. Shurin. 2007. Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs. Ecology 88:612-617.
43. van de Wolfshaar K. E., A. M. De Roos, and L. Persson. 2006. Sizedependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. American Naturalist 168:62-75.
44. Verdy, A., and P. Amarasekare. 2010 Alternative stable states in communities with intraguild predation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 262:116-128.
45. Walters, C. J., and J. F. Kitchell. 2001. Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 39-50.
46. Walters, C. J., D. Pauly, V. Christensen, and J. F. Kitchell. 2000. Representing density dependent consequences of life history strategies in aquatic ecosystems: Ecosim II. Ecosystems 3:70-83.
47. Werner, E. E., and J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 15:393-425.
48. Wilbur, H. M. 1988. Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. Pages 157-172 in B. Ebenman and L. Persson, eds. Size structured populations. Springer, Berlin