Prey persistence and abundance in systems with intraguild predation and type-2 functional responses

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 264, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1033-1042

  Abrams, Peter A ^a   Fung, Simon R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Enrichment; Food web; Omnivory; Productivity; Stability

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ENRICHMENT; FOOD WEB; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; OMNIVORY; PREDATION;

ARTICLE; DIETARY INTAKE; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; FOOD WEB; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION PRODUCTIVITY; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE PARTITIONING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952647799     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.045     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abrams P.A. Functional responses of optimal foragers. Am. Nat. 1982, 120:382-390.
2. Abrams P.A. Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1986, 29:107-160.
3. Abrams P.A. The functional responses of adaptive consumers of two resources. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1987, 32:262-288.
4. Abrams P.A. Decreasing functional responses as a result of adaptive consumer behavior. Evol. Ecol. 1989, 3:95-114.
5. Abrams P.A. The effects of adaptive behavior on the type-2 functional response. Ecology 1990, 71:877-885.
6. Abrams P.A. Mixed responses to resource densities and their implications for character displacement. Evol. Ecol. 1990, 4:93-102.
7. Abrams P.A. The fallacies of 'ratio-dependent' predation. Ecology 1994, 75:1842-1850.
8. Abrams P.A. Evolutionarily stable growth rates in size-structured populations under size-specific competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1994, 46:78-94.
9. Abrams P.A. When does periodic variation in resource growth allow robust coexistence of competing consumer species?. Ecology 2004, 85:372-382.
10. Abrams P.A. Determining the functional form of density dependence; deductive approaches for consumer-resource systems with a single resource. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:321-330.
11. Abrams P.A. Quantitative descriptions of resource choice in ecological models. Popul. Ecol. 2010, 52:47-58.
12. Abrams P.A., Ginzburg L. Models of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:337-341.
13. Abrams P.A., Holt R.D. The impact of consumer-resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumers. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002, 62:281-295.
14. Abrams P.A., Brassil C.E., Holt R.D. Dynamics and responses to mortality rates of competing predators undergoing predator-prey cycles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2003, 64:163-176.
15. Abrams P.A., Matsuda H. Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching. Popul. Ecol. 2004, 46:13-25.
16. Abrams P.A., Namba T., Mimura M., Roth J.D. Comment on Abrams and Roth: the relationship between productivity and population densities in cycling predator-prey systems. Evol. Ecol. 1997, 11:371-373.
17. Abrams P.A., Roth J.D. The responses of unstable food chains to enrichment. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:150-171.
18. Abrams P.A., Matsuda M., Harada Y. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima in the evolution of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 1993, 7:465-487.
19. Amarasekare P. Productivity, dispersal and the coexistence of intraguild predators and prey. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 243:121-133.
20. Amarasekare P. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation. Ecology 2007, 88:2720-2728.
21. Amarasekare P. Coexistence of intraguild predators and prey in resource-rich environments. Ecology 2008, 89:2786-2797.
22. Arim M., Marquet P.A. Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:557-564.
23. Armstrong R.A., McGehee R. Coexistence of competitors on one resource. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 56:499-502.
24. Armstrong R.A., McGehee R. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 1980, 115:151-170.
25. Berger K.M., Gese E.M., Berger J. Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes and pronghorn. Ecology 2008, 89:818-828.
26. Borer E.T., Briggs C.J., Murdoch W.W., Swarbrick S.L. Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity?. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:929-935.
27. Coll M., Guershon M. Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47:267-297.
28. Denno R.F., Fagan W.F. Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods?. Ecology 2003, 84:2522-2531.
29. Diehl S. The evolution and maintenance of omnivory: dynamic constraints and the role of food quality. Ecology 2003, 84:2557-2567.
30. Diehl S., Feissel M. Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:200-218.
31. Fryxell J.M., Lundberg P. Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:407-421.
32. Fryxell J.M., Lundberg P. Individual behaviour and community dynamics 1998, Chapman & Hall, London.
33. Fussmann G.F., Heber G. Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2002, 5:394-401.
34. Genkai-Kato M., Yamamura N. Profitability of prey determines the response of population abundances to enrichment. Proc. R. Soc. B 2000, 267:2397-2401.
35. Getz W.M. Metaphysiological and evolutionary dynamics of populations exploiting constant and interactive resources; r-K selection revisited. Evol. Ecol. 1993, 7:287-305.
36. Ginzberg L.R., Ackcakaya H.R. Consequences of ratio-dependent predation for steady-state properties of ecosystems. Ecology 1992, 7:1536-1543.
37. Gismervik I., Andersen T. Prey switching by Arcartia clausi; experimental evidence and implications of intraguild predation assessed by a model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 157:247-259.
38. Hart D.R. Intraguild predation, invertebrate predators and trophic cascades in lake food webs. J. Theor. Biol. 2002, 218:111-128.
39. HilleRisLambers R., van de Koppel J., Herman P.M.J. Persistence despite omnivory: benthic communities and the discrepancy between theory and observation. Oikos 2006, 113:23-32.
40. Holling C.S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 1959, 91:293-320.
41. Holt R.D., Huxel G.R. Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives. Ecology 2007, 88:2706-2712.
42. Holt R.D., Polis G.A. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am. Nat. 1997, 149:745-764.
43. Jeschke J.M., Kopp M., Tollrian R. Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79:337-349.
44. Kendall BE., Prendergast J., Bjørnstad O.N. The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in population cycles. Ecol. Lett. 1998, 1:160-164.
45. Kooi B.W., Kuijper L.D.J., Boer M.P., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Numerical bifurcation analysis of a tri-trophic food web with omnivory. Math. Biosci. 2002, 177 & 178:201-228.
46. Křivan V. Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2000, 58:79-94.
47. Křivan V., Diehl S. Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2005, 67:85-99.
48. Kuijper L.D.J., Kooi B.W., Zonneveld C., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Omnivory and food web dynamics. Ecol. Model. 2003, 163:19-32.
49. Leon J.A., Tumpson D. Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 50:185-201.
50. Ma B.O., Abrams P.A., Brassil C.E. Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:668-684.
51. Matsuda H., Abrams P.A., Hori M. The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators. Oikos 1993, 68:549-559.
52. McCann K., Hastings A. Re-evaluating the omnivory-stability relationship in food webs. Proc. R. Soc. B 1997, 264:1249-1254.
53. Mohr S., Adrian R. Reproductive success of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus feeding on ciliates and flagellates of different trophic modes. Freshwater Biol. 2002, 47:1832-1837.
54. Mylius S.D., Klumpers K., de Roos A.M., Persson L. Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. Am. Nat. 2001, 158:259-276.
55. Namba T., Tanabe K., Maeda N. Omnivory and stability of food webs. Ecol. Complex 2008, 5:73-85.
56. Nisbet R.M., Cunningham A., Gurney W. Endogeneous metabolism and the stability of microbial predator-prey systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25:301-306.
57. Pimm S.L. Food Webs 1982, Chapman & Hall, London.
58. Pimm S.L., Lawton J.H. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 1978, 275:542-544.
59. Polis G.A., Myers C.A., Holt R.D. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20:297-330.
60. Revilla T. Effects of intraguild predation on resource competition. J. Theor. Biol. 2002, 214:49-62.
61. Rinaldi S., Muratori S. Slow-fast limit cycles in predator-prey models. Ecol. Model. 1992, 61:287-308.
62. Ritchie E.G., Johnson C.N. Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:982-998.
63. Rosenheim J.A. Intraguild predation: New theoretical and empirical perspectives. Ecology 2007, 88:2679-2680.
64. Schoener T.W. Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1971, 2:369-404.
65. Skalski G.T., Gilliam J.F. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 2001, 82:3083-3092.
66. Sprules W.G., Bowerman J.E. Omnivory and food chain length in zooplankton food webs. Ecology 1988, 69:418-426.
67. Takimoto G., Miki T., Kigami M. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007, 72:264-273.
68. Thompson C.M., Gese E.M. Food webs and intraguild predation: community interactions of a native mesocarnivore. Ecology 2007, 88:334-346.
69. Thompson R.M., Hemberg M., Starzomski B.M., Shurin J.B. Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs. Ecology 2007, 88:612-617.
70. Vadeboncoeur Y., McCann K.S., Vander Zanden M.J., Rasmussen J.B. Effects of multi-chain omnivory on the strength of trophic control in lakes. Ecosystems 2005, 8:682-693.
71. Vandermeer J. Omnivory and the stability of food webs. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 238:497-504.
72. van de Wolfshaar K.E., de Roos A.M., Persson L. Size-dependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:62-75.
73. Wilson W.G., Abrams P.A. Coexistence of cycling consumer species having localized interactions; Armstrong and McGehee in space. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:193-205.