Corrigendum to "Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient" [Theor. Popul. Biol. 72 (2007) 264-273] (DOI:10.1016/j.tpb.2007.04.005);Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 264-273

  Takimoto, Gaku ^a   Miki, Takeshi ^b   Kagami, Maiko ^c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alternative states; Body size; Intraguild predation; Intraguild predator; Intraguild prey; Mathematical model; Productivity gradient; Stoichiometry; Trophic omnivory

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; FOOD WEB; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; MODEL; NUMERICAL METHOD; OMNIVORY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 34547679527     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.04.006     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Borer E.T., Briggs C.J., Murdoch W.W., and Swarbrick S.L. Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity?. Ecol. Lett. 6 (2003) 929-935
2. Chase J.M., and Leibold M.A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature 416 (2002) 427-430
3. Denno R.F., and Fagan W.F. Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods?. Ecology 84 (2003) 2522-2531
4. Diehl S. The evolution and maintenance of omnivory: dynamic constraints and the role of food quality. Ecology 84 (2003) 2557-2567
5. Diehl S., and Feissel M. Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. Am. Nat. 155 (2000) 200-218
6. Drake J.A. Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat. 137 (1991) 1-26
7. Ermentrout B. Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Systems: A Guide to XPPAUT for Researchers and Students (2002), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
8. Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., and Holling C.S. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 (2004) 557-581
9. Hobbs R.J., and Norton D.A. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 4 (1996) 93-110
10. Holt R.D., and Polis G.A. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am. Nat. 149 (1997) 745-764
11. Křivan V. Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58 (2000) 79-94
12. Křivan V., and Diehl S. Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theor. Popul. Biol. 67 (2005) 85-99
13. Lewontin, R.C., 1969. The meaning of stability. Diversity and stability in ecological systems. Report BNL-80175, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY.
14. Ludwig D., Jones D.D., and Holling C.S. Qualitative-analysis of insect outbreak systems-spruce budworm and forest. J. Anim. Ecol. 47 (1978) 315-332
15. MacNeil C., and Platvoet D. The predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus on native Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda); influences of differential microdistribution and food resources. J. Zool. 267 (2005) 31-38
16. Martinez N.D. Artifacts or attributes-effects of resolution on the Little-Rock Lake food web. Ecol. Monogr. 61 (1991) 367-392
17. May R.M. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature 269 (1977) 471-477
18. McCann K., and Hastings A. Re-evaluating the omnivory-stability relationship in food webs. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 264 (1997) 1249-1254
19. Mylius S.D., Klumpers K., de Roos A.M., and Persson L. Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. Am. Nat. 158 (2001) 259-276
20. Pimm S.L., and Lawton J.H. Feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275 (1978) 542-544
21. Polis G.A. Complex trophic interactions in deserts: an empirical critique of food web theory. Am. Nat. 138 (1991) 123-155
22. Polis G.A., Myers C.A., and Holt R.D. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 (1989) 297-330
23. Post D.M., and Takimoto G. Proximate structural mechanisms for variation in food-chain length. Oikos 116 (2007) 775-782
24. Price J.E., and Morin P.J. Colonization history determines alternate community states in a food web of intraguild predators. Ecology 85 (2004) 1017-1028
25. Revilla T. Effects of intraguild predation on resource competition. J. Theor. Biol. 214 (2002) 49-62
26. Rosenheim J.A., Kaya H.K., Ehler L.E., Marois J.J., and Jaffee B.A. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents-theory and evidence. Biol. Control 5 (1995) 303-335
27. Ruggieri E., and Schreiber S.J. The dynamics of the Schoener-Polis-Holt model of intra-guild predation. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2 (2005) 279-288
28. Scheffer M., Carpenter S., Foley J.A., Folke C., and Walker B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413 (2001) 591-596
29. Sergio F., Marchesi L., and Pedrini P. Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 72 (2003) 232-245
30. Spiller D.A., and Schoener T.W. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79 (1998) 503-516
31. Tanabe K., and Namba T. Omnivory creates chaos in simple food web models. Ecology 86 (2005) 3411-3414
32. van de Wolfshaar K.E., de Roos A.M., and Persson L. Size-dependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. Am. Nat. 168 (2006) 62-75
33. Wolfram Research, Inc., 1999. Mathematica, Version 4.0.. Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, Illinois.