Murine amniotic fluid stem cells contribute mesenchymal but not epithelial components to reconstituted mammary ducts

Stem Cell Research and Therapy

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Klemmt, Petra A B ^a   Vafaizadeh, Vida ^a   Groner, Bernd ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR TUMOR BIOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN; ALPHA6 INTEGRIN; BETA1 INTEGRIN; BMI1 PROTEIN; CD24 ANTIGEN; CD44V ANTIGEN; CYTOKERATIN 14; CYTOKERATIN 18; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; STAGE SPECIFIC EMBRYO ANTIGEN 1; STEM CELL ANTIGEN 1; STEM CELL FACTOR RECEPTOR; THY 1 ANTIGEN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TBX3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VIMENTIN; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ACINAR CELL; ADIPOCYTE; AMNIOTIC FLUID CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; BREAST EPITHELIUM; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDIDYMIS FAT; EPITHELIUM CELL; HORMONE SYNTHESIS; IMMUNE DEFICIENCY; IN VITRO STUDY; MAMMARY GLAND; MESENCHYME CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; MOUSE; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STEM CELL; STROMA;

ACTINS; ADIPOCYTES; ADIPOSE TISSUE; AMNIOTIC FLUID; ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MESODERM; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PHENOTYPE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PREGNANCY; REGENERATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

MURINAE; MUS;

EID: 79961229125     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17576512     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/scrt20     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore. Underwood MA Gilbert WM Sherman MP, J Perinatol 2005 25 341 348 10.1038/sj.jp.7211290 15861199 (Pubitemid 40645606)
2. Amniotic fluid cell types and culture. Gosden CM, Br Med Bull 1983 39 348 354 6357346 (Pubitemid 14189189)
3. Prenatal diagnosis of sex using cells from the amniotic fluid. Sachs L Serr DM Danon M, Science 1956 123 548 10.1126/science.123.3196.548 13298717
4. Oct-4-expressing cells in human amniotic fluid: a new source for stem cell research? Prusa AR Marton E Rosner M Bernaschek G, Hengstschlager M, Hum Reprod 2003 18 1489 1493 10.1093/humrep/deg279 12832377 (Pubitemid 36840959)
5. Studies on the origin of human amniotic fluid cells by immunofluorescent staining of keratin filaments. Chen WW, J Med Genet 1982 19 433 436 10.1136/jmg.19.6.433 6185680 (Pubitemid 13167542)
6. Cultured human amniotic fluid cells characterized with antibodies against intermediate filaments in indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Virtanen I von Koskull H Lehto VP Vartio T, Aula P, J Clin Invest 1981 68 1348 1355 10.1172/JCI110382 6170653 (Pubitemid 12235037)
7. Epithelial character and morphologic diversity of cell cultures from human amniotic fluids examined by immunofluorescence microscopy and gel electrophoresis of cytoskeletal proteins. Ochs BA Franke WW, Moll R Grund C, Cremer M Cremer T, Differentiation 1983 24 153 173 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1983. tb01316.x 6193018 (Pubitemid 13010766)
8. Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. De Coppi P Bartsch G Siddiqui MM Xu T, Santos CC Perin L, Mostoslavsky G Serre AC, Snyder EY Yoo JJ, Furth ME Soker S, Atala A, Nat Biotechnol 2007 25 100 106 10.1038/nbt1274 17206138 (Pubitemid 46087908)
9. Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Tsai M-S Lee J-L, Chang Y-J Hwang S-M, Hum Reprod 2004 19 1450 1456 10.1093/humrep/deh279 15105397 (Pubitemid 38807722)
10. Amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid-derived cells: potential tools for regenerative medicine? Parolini O Soncini M, Evangelista M Schmidt Dr, Regen Med 2009 4 275 291 10.2217/17460751.4.2.275 19317646
11. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from amniotic fluid originate neural precursors with functional voltage-gated sodium channels. Mareschi K Rustichelli D Comunanza V De Fazio R, Cravero C Morterra G, Martinoglio B Medico E, Carbone E Benedetto C, Fagioli F, Cytotherapy 2009 11 534 547 10.1080/14653240902974024 19548144
12. Information networks in the mammary gland. Hennighausen L Robinson GW, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005 6 715 725 10.1038/nrm1714 16231422
13. Key stages in mammary gland development: the cues that regulate ductal branching morphogenesis. Sternlicht MD, Breast Cancer Res 2006 8 201 10.1186/bcr1368 16524451
14. The mammary fat pad. Neville MC Medina D, Monks J Hovey RC, J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998 3 109 116 10.1023/A:1018786604818 10819521 (Pubitemid 128513224)
15. Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer. Wiseman BS Werb Z, Science 2002 296 1046 1049 10.1126/science.1067431 12004111 (Pubitemid 34517108)
16. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Stingl J Eirew P, Ricketson I Shackleton M, Vaillant F Choi D, Li HI Eaves CJ, Nature 2006 439 993 997 16395311 (Pubitemid 43292419)
17. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Shackleton M Vaillant F Simpson KJ Stingl J, Smyth GK Asselin-Labat ML, Wu L Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE, Nature 2006 439 84 88 10.1038/nature04372 16397499 (Pubitemid 43053633)
18. An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Kordon EC Smith GH, Development 1998 125 1921 1930 9550724 (Pubitemid 28274378)
19. Correction of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by gene therapy, augmented by insertional activation of MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16 or SETBP1. Ott MG Schmidt M Schwarzwaelder K Stein S, Siler U Koehl U, Glimm H Kuhlcke K, Schilz A Kunkel H, Naundorf S Brinkmann A, Deichmann A Fischer M, Ball C Pilz I, Dunbar C Du Y, Jenkins NA Copeland NG, Lüthi U Hassan M, Thrasher AJ Hoelzer D, von Kalle C Seger R, Grez M, Nat Med 2006 12 401 409 10.1038/nm1393 16582916
20. Interaction with the mammary microenvironment redirects spermatogenic cell fate in vivo. Boulanger CA Mack DL, Booth BW Smith GH, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 3871 3876 10.1073/pnas.0611637104 17360445 (Pubitemid 47181546)
21. The mammary microenvironment alters the differentiation repertoire of neural stem cells. Booth BW Mack DL, Androutsellis-Theotokis A McKay RD, Boulanger CA Smith GH, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 14891 14896 10.1073/pnas.0803214105 18809919
22. A modification of the Mallory connective tissue stain as a stain for keratin. Ayoub P Shklar G, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963 16 580 581 10.1016/0030-4220(63)90148-8 13965732
23. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Debnath J Muthuswamy SK Brugge JS, Methods 2003 30 256 268 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00032-X 12798140
24. Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Lee GY Kenny PA, Lee EH Bissell MJ, Nat Methods 2007 4 359 365 10.1038/nmeth1015 17396127 (Pubitemid 46766981)
25. CD24 staining of mouse mammary gland cells defines luminal epithelial, myoepithelial/basal and non-epithelial cells. Sleeman KE Kendrick H Ashworth A Isacke CM, Smalley MJ, Breast Cancer Res 2006 8 7 10.1186/bcr1371 16417656
26. In vitro differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells to epithelial lineage. Paunescu V Deak E Herman D Siska IR, Tanasie G Bunu C, Anghel S Tatu CA, Oprea TI Henschler R, Rüster B Bistrian R, Seifried E, J Cell Mol Med 2007 11 502 508 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00041.x 17635641 (Pubitemid 47153460)
27. Lumen formation during mammary epithelial morphogenesis: insights from in vitro and in vivo models. Mailleux A Overholtzer M Brugge J, Cell Cycle 2008 7 57 62 10.4161/cc.7.1.5150 18196964
28. Endothelial differentiation of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells: synergism of biochemical and shear force stimuli. Zhang P Baxter J Vinod K Tulenko TN, Di Muzio PJ, Stem Cells Dev 2009 18 1299 1308 10.1089/scd.2008.0331 19508152
29. Mesenchymal cells from human amniotic fluid survive and migrate after transplantation into adult rat brain. Cipriani S Bonini D Marchina E Balgkouranidou I, Caimi L Grassi Zucconi G, Barlati S, Cell Biol Int 2007 31 845 850 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.01.037 17379545 (Pubitemid 46765144)
30. Amniotic fluid stem cell migration after intraperitoneal injection in pup rats: implication for therapy. Ghionzoli M Cananzi M, Zani A Rossi CA, Fascetti Leon F Pierro A, Eaton S De Coppi P, Pediatr Surg Int 2010 26 79 84 10.1007/s00383-009-2504-x 19855985
31. Human amniotic fluid stem cells can integrate and differentiate into epithelial lung lineages. Minoo P Atala A, De Filippo RE Warburton D, Stem Cells 2008 26 2902 2911 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0090 18719226
32. Human amniotic fluid stem cells culture onto titanium screws: a new perspective for bone engineering. Antonucci I Pantalone A De Amicis D D'Onofrio S, Stuppia L Palka G, Salini V, J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2009 23 277 279 20003768
33. Sustained co-cultivation with human placenta-derived MSCs enhances ALK5/Smad3 signaling in human breast epithelial cells, leading to EMT and differentiation. Yoo YA Kang MH Kim BS Kim JS, Seo JH, Differentiation 2009 77 450 461 10.1016/j.diff.2009.03.003 19375841
34. Human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells have characteristics of multipotent stem cells. Kim J Lee Y Kim H Hwang K, Kwon H Kim S, Cho D Kang S, You J, Cell Proliferation 2007 40 75 90 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00414.x 17227297 (Pubitemid 46103692)
35. A comparative analysis of cartilage engineered from different perinatal mesenchymal progenitor cells. Kunisaki SM Fuchs JR, Steigman SA Fauza DO, Tissue Eng 2007 13 2633 2644 10.1089/ten.2006.0407 17655491 (Pubitemid 350076747)
36. Endothelial precursor cells as a model of tumor endothelium: characterization and comparison with mature endothelial cells. Bagley RG Walter-Yohrling J, Cao X Weber W, Simons B Cook BP, Chartrand SD Wang C, Madden SL Teicher BA, Cancer Res 2003 63 5866 5873 14522911 (Pubitemid 37187486)
37. Myoepithelial cells in the control of mammary development and tumorigenesis: data from genetically modified mice. Faraldo MM Teuliere J, Deugnier MA Taddei-De La Hosseraye I, Thiery JP Glukhova MA, J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2005 10 211 219 10.1007/s10911-005-9582-8 16807801
38. Capacity of mammary fat pads of adult C3H/HeMs mice to interact morphogenetically with fetal mammary epithelium. Sakakura T Nishizuka Y Dawe CJ, J Natl Cancer Inst 1979 63 733 736 288933 (Pubitemid 10225001)
39. Lineage enforcement by inductive mesenchyme on adult epithelial stem cells across developmental germ layers. Taylor RA Wang H Wilkinson SE Richards MG, Britt KL Vaillant F, Lindeman GJ Visvader JE, Cunha GR St John J, Risbridger GP, Stem Cells 2009 27 3032 3042 19862839
40. Epithelial-stromal interactions in the mouse and human mammary gland in vivo. Parmar H Cunha GR, Endocr Relat Cancer 2004 11 437 458 10.1677/erc.1.00659 15369447
41. Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Ortiz LA Gambelli F McBride C Gaupp D, Baddoo M Kaminski N, Phinney DG, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 8407 8411 10.1073/pnas.1432929100 12815096 (Pubitemid 36842558)
42. Comparison of the population capacity of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells in experimental colitis rat model. Wei Y Nie Y, Lai J Wan YJ, Li Y, Transplantation 2009 88 42 48 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a9f0a7 19584679