Normative data set identifying properties of the macula across age groups: Integration of visual function and retinal structure with microperimetry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Retina

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1294-1302

  Sabates, Felix N ^a   Vincent, Ryan D ^a   Koulen, Peter ^a   Sabates, Nelson R ^a   Gallimore, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; RETINA; RETINA MACULOPATHY; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961208486     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: 15392864     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182019be2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kniestedt C, Stamper RL. Visual acuity and its measurement. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003;16:155-170. (Pubitemid 36666037)
2. Ozdemir H, Karacorlu SA, Senturk F, Karacorlu M, Uysal O. Assessment of macular function by microperimetry in unilateral resolved central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 2008;22: 204-208. (Pubitemid 351266458)
3. Rohrschneider K, Bültmann S, Springer C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res 2008;27:536-548.
4. Anderson DR. Programmed visual field testing. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982;80:326-348. (Pubitemid 13059271)
5. Thomas R, George R. Interpreting automated perimetry. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001;49:125-140. (Pubitemid 33708636)
6. Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 2005;112:848-854. (Pubitemid 40631504)
7. Webb RH, Hughes GW, Pomerantzeff O. Flying spot TV ophthalmoscope. Appl Opt 1980;19:2991-2997. (Pubitemid 10021748)
8. Pomerantzeff O, Webb R. Scanning ophthalmoscope for examining the fundus of the eye. US patent 4,213,678. July 22, 1980.
9. Van de Velde FJ. The relaxed confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2006;302:25-35.
10. Tewari A, Eliott D, Singh CN, Garcia-Valenzuela E, Ito Y, Abrams GW. Changes in retinal sensitivity from retained subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid. Retina 2009;29:248-250.
11. Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE. Microperimetry-comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope-fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:125-134. (Pubitemid 40094849)
12. Midena E, Radin PP, Convento E, Cavarzeran F. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:63-68. (Pubitemid 46580600)
13. Vujosevic S, Midena E, Pilotto E, Radin PP, Chiesa L, Cavarzeran F. Diabetic macular edema: correlation between microperimetry and optical coherence tomography findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3044-3051. (Pubitemid 351639784)
14. Midena E, Radin PP, Pilotto E, Ghirlando A, Convento E, Varano M. Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a microperimetry study. Semin Ophthalmol 2004;19:55-61. (Pubitemid 39658410)
15. Kriechbaum K, Prager F, Geitzenauer W, et al. Association of retinal sensitivity and morphology during antiangiogenic treatment of retinal vein occlusion over one year. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2415-2421.
16. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Schumacher N, Fendrich T, Völcker HE. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126: 52-58. (Pubitemid 28341218)
17. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-1549. (Pubitemid 17153246)
18. Landa G, Rosen RB, Garcia PM, Seiple WH. Combined threedimensional spectral OCT/SLO topography and microperimetry: steps toward achieving functional spectral OCT/SLO. Ophthalmic Res 2009;43:92-98.
19. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3432-3437.
20. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Pareja A. Influence of the 'fatigue effect' on the mean deviation measurement in perimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 1997;7:29-34. (Pubitemid 27140438)
21. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, Sunness JS, Chang TS, Rossi JV. Characteristics of visual loss by scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:1067-1078. (Pubitemid 37485773)
22. Bartlett R. Linear modeling of Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient: an application of Fisher's z-transformation. Statistician 1993;42:45-53.
23. Baggaley A. Intermediate Correlational Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1964.
24. Hermann A, Paetzold J, Vonthein R, Krapp E, Rauscher S, Schiefer U. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101. Acta Ophthalmol 2008;86: 446-455.
25. Forte R, Cennamo G, Vecchio EC, Tenore R, Aufiero B, de Crecchio G. Bevacizumab in macular edema: functional and anatomic changes in a prospective case series. Retina 2009;29:941-948.