Looking from the Outside/In: Re-thinking Research Ethics Review

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 193-204

  Rivière, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Research relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961207664     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-011-9139-y     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Amit, V. (2000). The university as panopticon: Moral claims and attacks on academic freedom. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy (pp. 215-235). London: Routledge.
2. Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1, 2), 395-414.
3. Brown, S. (2007). Use of research-ethics boards is growing in Africa, study finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, A13. Available online at http://chronicle. com/weekly/v53/i22/22a01301. htm. Accessed November 2007.
4. Canadian Association of University Teachers. (1997). CAUT responds to Tri-Council Code. Available online at http://www. caut. ca/en/bulletin/issues/1997_oct/tricouncil. htm. Accessed October 2007.
5. Cannella, G. S. (2004). Regulatory power: can a feminist poststructuralist engage in research oversight? Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 235-245.
6. Fine, M., Tuck, E., & Zeller-Berkman, S. (2009). Do you believe in Geneva? Methods and ethics at the global/local nexus. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous knowledges (pp. 157-180). Los Angeles: Sage.
7. Gildersleeve, R. E. (2010). Dangerously important moment(s) in reflexive research practices with immigrant youth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(4), 407-421.
8. Guta, A., Wilson, M. G., Flicker, S., Travers, R., Mason, C., Wenyeve, G., et al. (2010). Are we asking the right questions? A review of Canadian REB practices in relation to community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(2), 35-46.
9. Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391-414.
10. Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2005). Unraveling ethics: illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2141-2162.
11. Knight, M. G., Bentley, C. C., Norton, N. E. L., & Dixon, I. R. (2004). (De)constructing (in)visible parent/guardian consent forms: negotiating power, reflexivity, and the collective within qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(3), 390-411.
12. Lewis, M. (2008). New strategies of control: academic freedom and research ethics boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 684-699.
13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Tierney, W. G. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
14. Nathan, R. (2005). An anthropologist goes under cover. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, B11. Available online at http://chronicle. com/subscribe/login?url=/weekly/v51/i47/47b01101. htm. Accessed November 2007.
15. Nicholson, H. (2002). The politics of trust: drama education and the ethic of care. Research in Drama Education, 7(1), 81-91.
16. O'Connell Davidson, J. (2008). If no means no, does yes mean yes? Consenting to research intimacies. History of the Human Sciences, 21(4), 49-67.
17. PRE (Interagency Panel on Research Ethics). (1998). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada. Available online at http://www. pre. ethics. gc. ca/eng/archives/tcps-eptc/Default/. Accessed February 2011.
18. PRE (Interagency Panel on Research Ethics). (2008). Draft 2nd edition of the Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada. Available online at www. pre. ethics. gc. ca/eng/policypolitique/initiatives/draft-preliminaire. Accessed June 2009.
19. PRE (Interagency Panel on Research Ethics). (2010a). 2nd edition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada. Available online at http://www. pre. ethics. gc. ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/Default/. Accessed December 2010.
20. PRE (Interagency Panel on Research Ethics). (2010b). TCPS 2-Chapter 3. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada. Available online at http://www. pre. ethics. gc. ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter3-chapitre3/. Accessed February 2011.
21. Rallis, S. F. (2010). "That is NOT what's happening at Horizon!": ethics and misrepresenting knowledge in text. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(4), 435-448.
22. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2010). Everyday ethics: Reflections on practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(4), 379-391.
23. Shea, C. (2000). Don't talk to the humans: the crackdown on social science research. Lingua Franca, 10(6), 27-34.
24. Stutchbury, K., & Fox, A. (2009). Ethics in educational research: introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(4), 489-504.
25. Tilley, S., & Gormley, L. (2007). Canadian university ethics review. Cultural complications: translating principles into practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 368-387.
26. Tronto, J. (1989). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body knowledge: Feminist reconstruction on being and knowing (pp. 172-187). London, UK: Rutgers University Press.
27. Wong, L. M. (1998). The ethics of rapport: institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 178-199.