Regulatory power: Can a feminist poststructuralist engage in research oversight?

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 235-245

  Cannella, Gaile S ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional review boards; Research diversity; Research regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750493893     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403262375     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Borasky, D., McGough, H., & International Participants. (2003, December). Determining cultural competence in international settings. Paper presented at the PRIM&R' s Reclaiming the Belmont Principles for Human Research Protections: Looking Back to Move Forward, Washington, D.C.
2. Brainard, J. (2003). Federal agency says oral history is not subject to rules on human research volunteers. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 21, 2003, from http://chronicle.com/daily/s003/10/ 200310210n.htm
3. Cohen, J., & Bross, L. (2003, December). Qualitative research: Considerations of IRB reviews. Paper presented at the PRIM&R' s Reclaiming the Belmont Principles for Human Research Protections: Looking Back to Move Forward, Washington, D.C.
4. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
5. Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. I, R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
6. Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
7. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and "ethically important moments." Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-281.
8. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2004a). Dangerous discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth [Special issue]. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 5-14.
10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (2004b). Qualitative research, power, and the radical right. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 175-201.
11. Lincoln, Y. S., & Tierney, W. (2004). Quality research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
12. Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443-479.
13. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2001). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
14. Verbitskaya, L. A. (1996). Academic freedom and university autonomy: A variety of concepts. Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 289-294.
15. Wagner, R. M. (2003, July). Ethical review of research involving human subjects: When and why is IRB review necessary? Muscle & Nerve, 28, 27-39.
16. Weinstein, M. (2004). Randomized design and the myth of certain knowledge: Guinea pig narratives and cultural critique. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 246-260.
17. Wright, D. (2004). Creative nonfiction and the academy: A cautionary tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 202-206.