Quantitative evolution of transposable and satellite DNA sequences in Picea species

Genome

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 431-435

  Sarri, V ^a   Ceccarelli, M ^a   Cionini, P G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Picea; quantitative dot blot hybridization; retrotransposons; satellite DNA; species evolution

Indexed keywords

SATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; GENE DOSAGE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; RETROPOSON; SPRUCE; TRANSPOSON;

DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DNA, SATELLITE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DOSAGE; GENOME, PLANT; PICEA; RETROELEMENTS;

PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PICEA ORIENTALIS; PICEA PUNGENS;

EID: 79961188663     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g11-007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altschul S.F. Gish W. Miller W. Myers E.W. Lipman D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215 (3): 403-410. 2231712
2. Bennett M.D. Leitch I.J. 2005. Nuclear DNA content in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 95 (1): 45-90. 10.1093/aob/mci003 (Pubitemid 41214450)
3. Bennetzen J.L. Ma J. Devos K.M. 2005. Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 95 (1): 127-132. 10.1093/aob/mci008 15596462 (Pubitemid 41214455)
4. Ceccarelli, M., Sarri, V., and Cionini, P.G. 2008. Repetitive DNA and plant evolution. In Plant genome. Biodiversity and evolution. Vol.1. Part E: Phanerogams-Angiosperms. Edited by A.K. Sharma and A. Sharma. Science Publishers, Enfield, Jersey, Plymouth. pp.1-14.
5. Ceccarelli M. Sarri V. Polizzi E. Andreozzi G. Cionini P.G. 2010. Characterization, evolution and chromosomal distribution of two satellite DNA sequence families in Lathyrus species. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 128 (4): 236-244. 10.1159/000298852 20424423
6. Charlesworth B. Sniegowski P. Stephan W. 1994. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature, 371 (6494): 215-220. 10.1038/371215a0 8078581 (Pubitemid 24293018)
7. Dellaporta S. Wood J. Hicks J. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1 (4): 19-21. 10.1007/BF02712670
8. Dhillon, S.S. 1987. DNA in tree species. In Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Edited by J.M. Bouga and D.J. Deuzan. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. pp.298-313.
9. Doolittle W.F. Sapienza C. 1980. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature, 284 (5757): 601-603. 10.1038/284601a0 6245369 (Pubitemid 10070865)
10. Ehrlich, S.D. 1989. Illegitimate recombination in bacteria. In Mobile DNA. Edited by D.E. Berg and M.M. Howe. American Society of Microbiology, Washington. pp.799-832.
11. Gregory T.R. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 76 (1): 65-101. 10.1017/S1464793100005595 11325054 (Pubitemid 32197946)
12. Greilhuber, J. 1988. Critical reassessment of DNA content in plants. In Kew Chromosome Conference II. Edited by P.E. Brandham. HMSO, London. pp.39-50.
13. Kidwell M.G. Lisch D. 1997. Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (15): 7704-7711. 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7704 9223252 (Pubitemid 27343714)
14. Kirst M. Johnson A.F. Baucom C. Ulrich E. Hubbard K. Staggs R. et al. 2003. Apparent homology of expressed genes from wood-forming tissues of loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) with Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (12): 7383-7388. 10.1073/pnas.1132171100 12771380 (Pubitemid 36706446)
15. Kubis S. Schmidt T. Heslop-Harrison J.S. 1998. Repetitive elements as a major component of plant genomes. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 82 (Suppl. A): 45-55. 10.1006/anbo.1998.0779 (Pubitemid 29014740)
16. Maggini F. D'Ovidio R. Gelati M.T. Frediani M. Cremonini R. Ceccarelli M. et al. 1995. Fok I DNA repeats in the genome of Vicia faba: species specificity, structure, redundancy modulation, and nuclear organization. Genome, 38 (6): 1255-1261. 10.1139/g95-165 8654919 (Pubitemid 3015107)
17. Morse A.M. Peterson D.G. Islam-Faridi M.N. Smith K.E. Magbanua Z. Garcia S.A. et al. 2009. Evolution of a genome size and complexity in Pinus. PLoS ONE, 4 (2): e4332. [online.] 10.1371/journal.pone.0004332 19194510
18. Ohri D. Khoshoo T.N. 1986. Genome size in gymnosperms. Plant Syst. Evol. 153 (1-2): 119-132. 10.1007/BF00989421
19. Orgel L.E. Crick F.H.C. 1980. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature, 284 (5757): 604-607. 10.1038/284604a0 7366731 (Pubitemid 10070866)
20. Pagel M. Johnstone R.A. 1992. Variation across species in the size of nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox. Proc. Biol. Sci. 249 (1325): 119-124. 10.1098/rspb.1992.0093 1360673
21. Pardue M.L. Danilevskaya O.N. Lowenhaupt K. Slot F. Traverse K.L. 1996. Drosophila telomeres: new views on chromosome evolution. Trends Genet. 12 (2): 48-52. 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81399-0 8851970 (Pubitemid 26051739)
22. Pearson W.R. Lipman D.J. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85 (8): 2444-2448. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 3162770
23. Presting G.G. Malysheva L. Fuchs J. Schubert I. 1998. A Ty 3/ gypsy retrotransposon-like sequence localized to the centromeric regions of cereal chromosomes. Plant J. 16 (6): 721-728. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00341.x 10069078 (Pubitemid 29083516)
24. Santini S. Cavallini A. Natali L. Minelli S. Maggini F. Cionini P.G. 2002. Ty 1/ copia-and Ty 3/ gypsy-like DNA sequences in Helianthus species. Chromosoma, 111 (3): 192-200. 10.1007/s00412-002-0196-2 12355209 (Pubitemid 36067395)
25. Sarri V. Minelli S. Panara F. Morgante M. Jurman I. Zuccolo A. Cionini P.G. 2008. Characterization and chromosomal organization of satellite DNA sequences in Picea abies. Genome, 51 (9): 705-713. 10.1139/G08-048 18772948
26. Schwarzacher, T., and Heslop-Harrison, J.S. 2000. Practical in situ hybridization. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
27. Sparrow A.H. Miksche J.P. 1961. Correlation of nuclear volume and DNA content with higher plant tolerance to chronic radiation. Science, 134 (3474): 282-283. 10.1126/science.134.3474.282 17798818