Gender and computing conference papers

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 72-80

  Cohoon, J McGrath ^a   Nigai, Sergey ^b   Kaye, Joseph Jofish ^c  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPERS; GENDER AND COMPUTING;

EID: 79961079806     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1978542.1978561     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A., and Caprasecca, A. Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics 79, 3 (2009), 517-539.
2. American Federation of Information Processing Societies. AFIPS Records 1960-1990; http://www.cbi.umn.edu/collections/inv/cbi00044.html
3. Budden, A., Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., and Lortie, C. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23, 1 (2007), 4-6.
4. Charles, M. and Bradley, K. A matter of degrees: Female underrepresentation in computer science programs cross-nationally. In Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation, J.M. Cohoon and W. Aspray, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
5. Cohoon, J.M. and Aspray, W. Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
6. Cohoon, J.M., Wu, Z., and Luo, L. Will they stay or will they go? SIGCSE Bulletin 40, 1 (Feb. 2008), 397-401.
7. Correll, S.J. Gender and the career-choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. The American Journal of Sociology 106, 6 (2001), 1691-1730.
8. DiTomaso, N., Post, C., and Parks-Yancy, R. Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology 33 (2007), 473-501.
9. Faulkner, W. The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for 'making gender stick' to engineers. Science, Technology & Human Values 25, 1 (2000), 87.
10. Fox, M.F. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35, 1 (2005), 131-150. (Pubitemid 40427615)
11. Fox, M.F. and Mohapatra S. Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education 78, 5 (2007), 543-571.
12. Goldberg, P. Are women prejudiced against women? Society 5, 5 (1968), 28-30.
13. Greco, R., Wharton, R., Estelami, H., and Jones, R. The state of scholarly journal publishing 1981-2000. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 37, 3 (2006), 155-214. (Pubitemid 43690147)
14. Greenwald, G. and Krieger, L. Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. California Law Review 94, 4 (2006), 945-967. (Pubitemid 44413490)
15. Kaye, J. Some statistical analyses of CHI. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, Apr. 4-9). ACM Press, New York, 2009, 2585-2594.
16. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., and Thomas, D. The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the Diversity Research Network. Human Resource Management 42 (2003), 3-21. (Pubitemid 37514427)
17. Mannix, E. and Neale, M. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. American Psychological Association 6, 2 (2005), 31-55. (Pubitemid 43224085)
18. Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
19. National Center for Women & Information Technology. Women in IT: The Facts. Boulder, CO; http://www.ncwit.org/pdf/NCWIT-WomenInITFacts-FINAL.pdf
20. Page, S.E. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007.
21. Smyth, F.L., Greenwald, A.G., and Nosek, B.A. Gender Gap in Implicit Gender-Science Associations Is Greatest Among Science Majors (unpublished manuscript, 2010).
22. Wajcman, J. TechnoFeminism. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2004.
23. Wallentin, M. Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain and Language 108 (2009), 175-183.
24. Whittington, K. and Smith-Doerr, L. Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender and Society 22, 194 (2008), 194-218.
25. Williams, K. and O'Reilly, C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In Research in Organizational Behavior, B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, Eds. JAI, Greenwich, CT, 1998, 77-140. (Pubitemid 128054175)