Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients

BJU International

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 583-587

  Greco, Francesco ^a   Hoda, M Raschid ^a   Wagner, Sigrid ^a   Reichelt, Olaf ^a   Inferrera, Antonino ^b   Magno, Carlo ^b   Fornara, Paolo ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

Author keywords

continence recovery; intrafascial nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; potency; prostate cancer; surgical outcomes

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; VARDENAFIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILATERAL LAPAROSCOPIC INTRAFACIAL NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG POTENCY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT DURATION; UNILATERAL LAPAROSCOPIC INTRAFACIAL NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;

AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TRAUMA, NERVOUS SYSTEM; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 79961059226     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09836.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al,. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 68-80 (Pubitemid 350166735)
2. Voegeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, Rassweiler J, Sulser T, Laparoscopic Working Group of the German Urological Association. Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 441-6 (Pubitemid 35396727)
3. Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G, et al,. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 401-6 (Pubitemid 37185663)
4. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, et al,. Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 98-104 (Pubitemid 43870132)
5. Salomon L, Sèbe P, De La Taille A, et al,. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I. BJU Int 2004; 94: 238-43
6. Salomon L, Sèbe P, De La Taille A, et al,. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part II. BJU Int 2004; 94: 244-50
7. Remzi M, Klinger HC, Tinzl MV, et al,. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 83-9 (Pubitemid 40835597)
8. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P,. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1461-6 (Pubitemid 47164817)
9. Greco F, Wagner S, Hoda MR, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open retropubic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: surgical and functional outcomes in 300 patients. BJU Int 2010; 106: 543-7
10. Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg JU, Sulser T, et al,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy- the experience of the german laparoscopic working group. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 113-9 (Pubitemid 41789965)
11. Touijer K, Guillonneau B,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 625-32 (Pubitemid 43374722)
12. Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos E, Rabenalt R, et al,. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy-Effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 103-12
13. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al,. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 931-40
14. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, et al,. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1467-72
15. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001; 166: 2101-8 (Pubitemid 33065229)
16. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D, Seemann O, Frede T,. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 75-82 (Pubitemid 38315399)
17. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Tannapfel A, Truss MC, Liatsikos E,. Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: University of Leipzig technique. J Endourol 2006; 20: 925-9 (Pubitemid 44907027)
18. Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R, et al,. Complications, urinary continence and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charitè Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 1278-84 (Pubitemid 44692932)
19. Sievert KD, Hennenlotter J, Laible I, et al,. The periprostatic autonomic nerves-bundle or layer? Eur Urol 2008; 54: 1109-16
20. Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A, et al,. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 353-60
21. Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, et al,. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 87-99